Spencer Pratt engagement report
@spencerpratt - 1.4M followers on X
Measured over 121 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1.6K interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.115%. Measured over 121 original posts, its engagement rate beats 75% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 138K times each, and 1.15% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.95% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 9.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 121 posts sampled, 64% carry an image or video and 36% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 90K interactions, about 56x its own typical post.
Measured over 121 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Spencer Pratt's engagement rate beats 75% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 54% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.115%, Spencer Pratt sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,350 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.081% to 0.437%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.081% |
| 75th percentile | 0.437% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 159.9% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 52K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 53K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 51K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 55K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 44K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 43K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 49K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 53K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 62K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 71K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 74K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 80K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 88K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 97K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 100K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 103K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 100K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 93K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 87K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 82K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 76K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 67K |
| 22:00 UTC | -1% | 58K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 52K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 235K |
| Monday | 0% | 296K |
| Tuesday | -3% | 292K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 254K |
| Thursday | -2% | 248K |
| Friday | -3% | 256K |
| Saturday | +3% | 230K |
Best tweets
- Aug 24, 202656x their median
We've lost our damn minds. The Lindsay Clancy mass psychosis proves that a lot of people need to have their Wifi taken away. But this psychosis started many years before TikTok... https://t.co/WhT1iXJ9Pj
- Aug 31, 202650x their median
In case you were wondering why there are so many fires in California... It ain't climate change. https://t.co/n3xAPD3orW
- Aug 30, 202639x their median
It is a perfectly reasonable standard for a society to set that if you murder a child, your life is over. If you wanna let an insanity plea spare them from the death penalty? Fine. But they must die in prison. It’s not about punishment. It’s just protection. If you could snap and kill a kid, you simply can’t be trusted around people anymore. No matter what triggered it. This is in no way controversial. It’s not like these baby killers are out curing cancer or something. They can rot in jail and ask God for mercy. We have become way too tolerant of criminality and way too compassionate towards the dregs of society. We have to stop wasting our compassion on baby killers and drug zombies. We have fire victims in Altadena and the Palisades and Spokane and Paradise (still) who are completely screwed and we are using up all our energy and empathy on the worst people in society. Snap out of it, folks.
- Aug 18, 202631x their median
Remember...all polls are fake. Thanks for coming to my TED Talk.
- Aug 23, 202630x their median
The only affordable housing in Los Angeles is me living rent-free in Karen Bass' and Nithya Raman's heads.
- Aug 18, 202627x their median
This very odd bird who is now regulating what tires you can get in CA just gave away the whole scam. She cites high gas prices to justify it: "If we can bring down those costs even a little bit, why wouldn't we do it?" Of course, no mention of reducing CA's self-imposed gas taxes that make our fuel costs 2X the national average. See the magic trick? They deliberately make your gas prices more expensive, to compel you to stop driving. Then they use the artificially high cost of fuel to impose further regulations and higher tire costs on you. The whole communist schtick is a positive feedback loop. It's the Arsonist-Firefighter Fallacy. What's even more rich about this is that this is essentially an EV tax. EV ownership is skyrocketing, and what's their fatal flaw? They are VERY heavy vehicles, and they chew through tires like crazy. As the state has pushed more and more drivers into EVs, they're trying to find new ways to hurt drivers financially now that they're skipping out on the gas taxes. Devious, devious little commies.
- Aug 5, 202622x their median
We cannot let Spokane fall through the cracks. https://t.co/pbv6aLmNEs
- Aug 31, 202622x their median
Oompa Loompa Abdul is always overcompensating for being so petite. He acts tough, but he’s pillow soft. This dude can’t handle this gig. He’s gonna snap soon. He’s already cracking. https://t.co/7DGFYH9sSH
- Jul 22, 202620x their median
Greasy Gavin and Bonehead Bonta are the real life slick-haired archetypal douchebag villains we've seen in every movie. Now they're coming to destroy the Hollywood for good, over petty politics. The Paramount sabotage is...way worse than you think. https://t.co/vxop7tX8SO
- Aug 29, 202620x their median
When did our late night comedy shows turn into televised therapy sessions? https://t.co/07Hur98VAR
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1.6K interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.115%. Measured over 121 original posts, its engagement rate beats 75% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 138K times each, and 1.15% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.95% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 9.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 121 posts sampled, 64% carry an image or video and 36% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 90K interactions, about 56x its own typical post.
- What is Spencer Pratt's engagement rate on X?
- Spencer Pratt (@spencerpratt) has an engagement rate of 0.115%, based on the median interactions across 121 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,391,419 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.115%, Spencer Pratt sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,350 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @spencerpratt have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 75% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @spencerpratt post?
- Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 9.1 posts per day across the measured window.