Spencer Pratt engagement report
@spencerpratt - 1.5M followers on X
Measured over 279 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 3.6K interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.248%. Measured over 279 original posts, its engagement rate beats 84% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 122K times each, and 2.94% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.42% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 23.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 279 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video and 23% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 390K interactions, about 181x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #brysonfire, #aperfectunion, #backstabbingnithya.
Measured over 279 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026. Recurring tags: #brysonfire, #aperfectunion, #backstabbingnithya.
Compared with accounts its own size
Spencer Pratt's engagement rate beats 84% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 78% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.248%, Spencer Pratt sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.677%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.677% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 75% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 23% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 75% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 23% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 274 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Dec 5, 2025181x their median
Today, Netflix announced our acquisition of Warner Bros. Together, we’ll define the next century of storytelling, creating an extraordinary entertainment offering for audiences everywhere. https://t.co/rXPFMNIs1A https://t.co/0pdsMUEob8
- Oct 16, 202656x their median
Dude. Elon Musk is on another planet. https://t.co/8rJNILOXXS
- Sep 11, 202639x their median
Remember...Mamdani's story about his aunt is completely fake. His aunt was not in New York City. She was in Tanzania. Fake story, fake tears...he's just a filthy scammer. https://t.co/HsRfrZBhhi
- Oct 17, 202638x their median
For those of you who aren’t students of history…this is precisely what a communist revolution looks like. https://t.co/9F8tGsGga3
- Sep 2, 202637x their median
This video of 9-11 in 2001 is trending in 2026 because many are saying it's the first time they've seen the video. It shows the plane hitting the second tower. https://t.co/CATIJ4xb8V
- May 26, 202644x their median
People always ask me, “how can we fix LA? We don’t have the money!” We have the money…it’s just being stolen! You wanna fix the budget? END THE FRAUD. I will bust the scammers and put your tax dollars back to work for YOU. https://t.co/4y2zrcy1aJ
- Aug 31, 202630x their median
In case you were wondering why there are so many fires in California... It ain't climate change. https://t.co/n3xAPD3orW
- Aug 24, 202627x their median
We've lost our damn minds. The Lindsay Clancy mass psychosis proves that a lot of people need to have their Wifi taken away. But this psychosis started many years before TikTok... https://t.co/WhT1iXJ9Pj
- Sep 11, 202625x their median
25 years ago, today…we learned what “globalize the intifada” means. Seems we’ve forgotten. https://t.co/oZMevft9pX
- Sep 13, 202624x their median
Incredible. Rachel Maddow didn’t push back on Karen Bass AT ALL as she calls the Palisades Fire investigation a waste of time & resources. Lady…6K homes burned, hundreds of people died, and you illegally deleted all of your messages. Integrity is dead. https://t.co/y9Z5K22EZh
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 3.6K interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.248%. Measured over 279 original posts, its engagement rate beats 84% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 122K times each, and 2.94% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.42% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 23.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 279 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video and 23% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 390K interactions, about 181x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #brysonfire, #aperfectunion, #backstabbingnithya.
- What is Spencer Pratt's engagement rate on X?
- Spencer Pratt (@spencerpratt) has an engagement rate of 0.248%, based on the median interactions across 279 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,451,660 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.248%, Spencer Pratt sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @spencerpratt have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 84% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @spencerpratt post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 23.57 posts per day across the measured window.