Back to @soulfade0's profile

Soul Fade engagement report

@soulfade0 - 112K followers on X

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 19, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.683%
of 112K followers
Per impression
1.75%
41K views on a typical post
Reach
39.0%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
718
interactions (median)
Saved
0.846%
346 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 718 interactions against 112K followers, an engagement rate of 0.683%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 83% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 41K times each, and 1.75% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 36.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 20% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 33K interactions, about 46x its own typical post.

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 19, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Soul Fade's engagement rate beats 83% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 57% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.683%, Soul Fade sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 135 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 12, 202646x their median

    BBC top never don't care about bottom 😚😈 https://t.co/GJG7V0OCui

    29K3.6K114381.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 202633x their median

    How could a Dubai Sheikh not have a slave like this? 😎 He just sits there with his legs spread, going “Habibi,” while the slave comes over and gives his feet a good lick. Damn, look how nicely he’s licking both feet—uff. 😮‍💨 https://t.co/x8DqhDvDYI

    21K3.0K2825321K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 202610x their median

    My son with his uncle I mean my son with my brother 😂🤙 https://t.co/0QwJai5cIM

    6.5K691131136K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20268.8x their median

    Uncle caught his nephew & nephew friend when they were 💀 So uncle just took his own chance ☠️🥴 Part 1 .. https://t.co/GeUPZl21iA

    5.7K60670160K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 20267.3x their median

    The nephew is home alone with his uncle. 💀 https://t.co/7ZIwaHZAk0

    4.6K658116163K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20266.6x their median

    Uncle caught his nephew & nephew friend when they were 💀 So uncle just took his own chance ☠️🥴 Part 3 .. https://t.co/qSSj6Bn3k4

    4.3K5075086K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20263.9x their median

    Fagg is perfectly used 😈 https://t.co/5Bv4kNee9o

    2.5K2907265K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20263.0x their median

    Arab men are on a whole different level—they’ve got that effortlessly handsome 😈 Arabs fuck in a way that no other people in the world can! They say “Habibi,” get the Punjabis hard and worked up, then fuck those little bottoms however they want 🥵💀 https://t.co/7FyIUc2ANf

    1.9K1991195K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20262.9x their median

    Shortl twink lad fucking wiped after getting his ass wrecked by that old dude. 🫩🥴 Old guy always loved to fuck nowadays twinks 😎 https://t.co/RRa5aQQnro

    1.9K2001075K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20262.5x their median

    Just look at him—how is he even doing it with that huge guy,with his tiny little body? 💀 That's called real twink 💀😈 https://t.co/r0HubB9ZEw

    1.5K26344133K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 718 interactions against 112K followers, an engagement rate of 0.683%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 83% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 41K times each, and 1.75% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 36.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 20% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 33K interactions, about 46x its own typical post.

What is Soul Fade's engagement rate on X?
Soul Fade (@soulfade0) has an engagement rate of 0.683%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 112,062 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.683%, Soul Fade sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @soulfade0 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 83% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @soulfade0 post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going