Soul Fade engagement report
@soulfade0 - 112K followers on X
Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 19, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 718 interactions against 112K followers, an engagement rate of 0.683%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 83% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 41K times each, and 1.75% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 36.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 20% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 33K interactions, about 46x its own typical post.
Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 19, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Soul Fade's engagement rate beats 83% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 57% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.683%, Soul Fade sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 135 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jun 12, 202646x their median
BBC top never don't care about bottom 😚😈 https://t.co/GJG7V0OCui
- Sep 13, 202633x their median
How could a Dubai Sheikh not have a slave like this? 😎 He just sits there with his legs spread, going “Habibi,” while the slave comes over and gives his feet a good lick. Damn, look how nicely he’s licking both feet—uff. 😮💨 https://t.co/x8DqhDvDYI
- Sep 6, 202610x their median
My son with his uncle I mean my son with my brother 😂🤙 https://t.co/0QwJai5cIM
- Sep 8, 20268.8x their median
Uncle caught his nephew & nephew friend when they were 💀 So uncle just took his own chance ☠️🥴 Part 1 .. https://t.co/GeUPZl21iA
- Aug 2, 20267.3x their median
The nephew is home alone with his uncle. 💀 https://t.co/7ZIwaHZAk0
- Sep 12, 20266.6x their median
Uncle caught his nephew & nephew friend when they were 💀 So uncle just took his own chance ☠️🥴 Part 3 .. https://t.co/qSSj6Bn3k4
- Sep 2, 20263.9x their median
Fagg is perfectly used 😈 https://t.co/5Bv4kNee9o
- Aug 10, 20263.0x their median
Arab men are on a whole different level—they’ve got that effortlessly handsome 😈 Arabs fuck in a way that no other people in the world can! They say “Habibi,” get the Punjabis hard and worked up, then fuck those little bottoms however they want 🥵💀 https://t.co/7FyIUc2ANf
- Sep 14, 20262.9x their median
Shortl twink lad fucking wiped after getting his ass wrecked by that old dude. 🥴 Old guy always loved to fuck nowadays twinks 😎 https://t.co/RRa5aQQnro
- Aug 14, 20262.5x their median
Just look at him—how is he even doing it with that huge guy,with his tiny little body? 💀 That's called real twink 💀😈 https://t.co/r0HubB9ZEw
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 718 interactions against 112K followers, an engagement rate of 0.683%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 83% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 41K times each, and 1.75% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 36.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 20% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 33K interactions, about 46x its own typical post.
- What is Soul Fade's engagement rate on X?
- Soul Fade (@soulfade0) has an engagement rate of 0.683%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 112,062 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.683%, Soul Fade sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @soulfade0 have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 83% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @soulfade0 post?
- Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.