Back to @sofoot's profile

SO FOOT engagement report

@sofoot - 394K followers on X

Measured over 43 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.002%
of 394K followers
Per impression
0.083%
11K views on a typical post
Reach
2.75%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
9
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.03/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 9 interactions against 394K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 43 original posts, its engagement rate beats 8% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 0.083% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.75% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 43 posts sampled, 53% carry an image or video, 35% are part of a thread and 56% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.0K interactions, about 782x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #allezlemansfc, #srfc𝐋𝐌𝐅𝐂.

Measured over 43 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026. Recurring tags: #allezlemansfc, #srfc𝐋𝐌𝐅𝐂.

Compared with accounts its own size

SO FOOT's engagement rate beats 8% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 5% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.002%, SO FOOT sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99156.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,701 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 104,204 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile156.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%53K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%52K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%75K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%90K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-3%101K
15:00 UTC-2%105K
16:00 UTC-4%102K
17:00 UTC-3%95K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%69K
22:00 UTC-2%60K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%238K
Monday0%302K
Tuesday-3%302K
Wednesday-1%257K
Thursday-2%250K
Friday-3%259K
Saturday+3%233K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jun 29, 2025782x their median

    ⚖️ 🇩🇿 Enfermé pour avoir fait son travail ! Notre journaliste Christophe Gleizes condamné à 7 ans de prison ferme an Algérie... Ses proches et sa rédaction sont sous le choc. Notre article ▶️ https://t.co/oAvesn4pYC https://t.co/bcNzlkPP1Y

    4.0K1.7K8824862.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202621x their median

    C'est fort, mais on attend de voir quand il se frottera à Lens. https://t.co/OhXX4d3l56

    171710128K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20266.6x their median

    La baston dans le foot est-elle en voie de disparition ? Le VAR, l’obsession des instances pour un football “propre” et des coachs qui ne jurent plus que par le jeu au sol font petit à petit disparaitre les mauvais gestes et les méchants des terrains. Une bonne nouvelle ? Pas forcément. On en parle dans le nouveau numéro de SO FOOT, en kiosque dès le 3 septembre.

    3718409.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20266.0x their median

    Le temps que vous terminiez de lire cet article, le FC Nantes aura peut-être encore changé de coach. https://t.co/FnvgOB3C6g

    41111112K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20265.8x their median

    C'est un 6, mais aussi un 8, et peut-être même un 9. Bref, vous additionnez tout ça, et il mérite bien un 10. https://t.co/QpasX68zyg

    4822013K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20264.8x their median

    Le Lucho Time va bientôt dépasser le Fergie Time. https://t.co/XXu6ooI1mM

    3922012K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20263.9x their median

    Quand tes parents entraient dans la chambre sans frapper. https://t.co/8wCCCovtCl

    3401023K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20263.9x their median

    Rayan Cherki c'est le joueur dont les gamins fans de City parleront à leurs enfants plus tard. ▶️ https://t.co/9UBBfrKanD https://t.co/uCuz8glVVr

    3140012K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20263.6x their median

    Les supporters lensois vont pouvoir réviser leurs leçons d'anglais. https://t.co/9ShdnzNXMS

    3011012K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20263.4x their median

    #SRFC𝐋𝐌𝐅𝐂 2️⃣-2️⃣ ⏱️ 67' | Sorties de Calodat et Gueye, entrées de Sidibé et Rabillard 🔃 #AllezLeMansFC 🔴🟡

    1964222K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#allezlemansfc#srfc𝐋𝐌𝐅𝐂

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 9 interactions against 394K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 43 original posts, its engagement rate beats 8% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 0.083% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.75% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 43 posts sampled, 53% carry an image or video, 35% are part of a thread and 56% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.0K interactions, about 782x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #allezlemansfc, #srfc𝐋𝐌𝐅𝐂.

What is SO FOOT's engagement rate on X?
SO FOOT (@sofoot) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 43 original posts from the last 30 days against 394,419 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.002%, SO FOOT sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @sofoot have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 8% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @sofoot post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going

SO FOOT (@sofoot) Engagement Rate - 0.002% | PlayerSells