Back to @so_luvable's profile

ღ ℒυvᥲbᥣᥱ engagement report

@so_luvable - 175K followers on X

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 19, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.002%
of 175K followers
Per impression
0.19%
1.6K views on a typical post
Reach
0.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.1/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
04:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 3 interactions against 175K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 8% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.6K times each, and 0.19% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.904% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 15% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9 interactions, about 3.0x its own typical post.

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 19, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

ღ ℒυvᥲbᥣᥱ's engagement rate beats 8% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 12% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.002%, ღ ℒυvᥲbᥣᥱ sits below the 10th percentile of the 157,102 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,102 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,052 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 04:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video15% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link15% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 15% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 15% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 54 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 9, 20263.0x their median

    𝕋𝕙𝕖𝕪 𝔸𝕝𝕨𝕒𝕪𝕤 𝕋𝕣𝕪 𝕋𝕠 ℂ𝕠𝕞𝕖 𝔹𝕒𝕔𝕜, . .

    22142.0K viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 20262.3x their median

    ℕ𝕠 𝕎𝕠𝕣𝕣𝕪’𝕤, . . . . https://t.co/CsMcavtayl

    42017.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20261.7x their median

    ℝ𝕠𝕔𝕜 𝕋𝕙𝕒 𝔹𝕠𝕒𝕥 𝕎𝕠𝕣𝕜 𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕄𝕚𝕕𝕕𝕝𝕖 🍑

    22101.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 2026

    𝕀 𝔹𝕖 𝕎𝕒𝕟𝕥𝕚𝕟𝕘 𝕋𝕠 𝔸𝕔𝕥 𝕄𝕪𝕤𝕥𝕖𝕣𝕚𝕠𝕦𝕤 𝔹𝕦𝕥, . . .𝕌𝕟𝕗𝕠𝕣𝕥𝕦𝕟𝕒𝕥𝕖𝕝𝕪 𝕀'𝕞 ℍ𝕚𝕝𝕒𝕣𝕚𝕠𝕦𝕤 & ℍ𝕒𝕧𝕖 𝕋𝕙𝕚𝕟𝕘𝕤 𝕋𝕠 𝕊𝕒𝕪.

    31002.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 2026

    𝕀 ℂ𝕒𝕟’𝕥 𝔻𝕖𝕒𝕝 𝕎𝕚𝕥𝕙 𝕐𝕠𝕦 𝕀𝕗 𝔼𝕧𝕖𝕣𝕪𝕕𝕒𝕪 𝕐𝕠𝕦 ℍ𝕒𝕧𝕚𝕟𝕘 𝔸 𝔹𝕒𝕕 𝔻𝕒𝕪!

    22001.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 2026

    𝕋𝕙𝕖𝕪 𝔾𝕖𝕥 𝕄𝕒𝕕 𝕎𝕙𝕖𝕟 𝕐𝕠𝕦 𝔾𝕖𝕥𝕥𝕚𝕟’ 𝕄𝕠𝕣𝕖 𝔸𝕥𝕥𝕖𝕟𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟 , . . . 𝔸𝕟𝕕 𝕐𝕠𝕦 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥 ℂ𝕙𝕚𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕟’

    22001.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 2026

    𝔻𝕖𝕖𝕡 𝕀𝕟 𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕎𝕒𝕥𝕖𝕣, . . . 𝕀𝕥’𝕤 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥 𝕐𝕆𝕌 & 𝕄𝕖 https://t.co/WrBuy8cgsq

    2200939 viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 2026

    𝕎𝕙𝕖𝕟 𝕐𝕠𝕦 𝔽𝕒𝕝𝕝 𝔹𝕒𝕔𝕜, . . . 𝕐𝕠𝕦 𝔾𝕖𝕥 𝔸 𝔹𝕖𝕥𝕥𝕖𝕣 𝕍𝕚𝕖𝕨

    12001.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 2026

    𝕋𝕙𝕖𝕪 𝕎𝕒𝕟𝕥 𝕋𝕠 ℙ𝕝𝕒𝕪 𝔾𝕒𝕞𝕖𝕤, . . . 𝔹𝕦𝕥 𝔾𝕖𝕥 𝕄𝕒𝕕 𝕎𝕙𝕖𝕟 𝕐𝕠𝕦 ℙ𝕝𝕒𝕪 𝔹𝕒𝕔𝕜

    12001.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 2026

    𝕎𝕙𝕖𝕟 𝕊𝕠𝕞𝕖𝕠𝕟𝕖’𝕤 𝕀𝕤 𝔾𝕚𝕧𝕚𝕟𝕘 𝕐𝕠𝕦 𝔸𝕥𝕥𝕖𝕟𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟, . . . 𝕋𝕙𝕖𝕟 𝕋𝕙𝕖𝕪 𝕎𝕒𝕟𝕥 𝕋𝕠 𝕊𝕥𝕒𝕣𝕥 𝔸𝕔𝕥𝕚𝕟𝕘 𝕃𝕚𝕜𝕖 𝕋𝕙𝕖𝕪 ℂ𝕒𝕣𝕖 𝔸𝕘𝕒𝕚𝕟!

    12001.3K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3 interactions against 175K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 8% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.6K times each, and 0.19% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.904% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 15% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9 interactions, about 3.0x its own typical post.

What is ღ ℒυvᥲbᥣᥱ's engagement rate on X?
ღ ℒυvᥲbᥣᥱ (@so_luvable) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 175,070 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.002%, ღ ℒυvᥲbᥣᥱ sits below the 10th percentile of the 157,102 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @so_luvable have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 8% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @so_luvable post?
Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going