Back to @smile2jannah's profile

smile2jannah engagement report

@smile2jannah - 230K followers on X

Measured over 41 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.382%
of 230K followers
Per impression
4.70%
19K views on a typical post
Reach
8.14%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
879
interactions (median)
Saved
0.246%
46 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.73/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 879 interactions against 230K followers, an engagement rate of 0.382%. Measured over 41 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 4.70% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.13% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 41 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 26x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #china, #statedinner, #trump.

Measured over 41 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026. Recurring tags: #china, #statedinner, #trump.

Compared with accounts its own size

smile2jannah's engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 86% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.382%, smile2jannah sits above the 50th percentile of the 201,787 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.142% to 0.672%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.672%
p902.54%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,787 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,901 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.672%
90th percentile2.54%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video98% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 98% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 168 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 19, 202626x their median

    In 2014 Nigel Farage went on LBC to complain about hearing foreign languages on trains. James O'Brien: But your wife and kids speak German. That was the first and last time they ever spoke. https://t.co/h3S84gp5B5

    20K2.8K15799707K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 202624x their median

    "No Jews in Islamic countries" Tommy Robinson Tehran has 6,000 Jews and 30 synagogues. Next lie, please. 🎤 https://t.co/HS0M8STGNI

    17K3.0K51873331K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 202614x their median

    Topless Hindu men rolling in the streets of North London. No women participating. Police cordons. Traffic diverted. Tommy? Nigel? GB News? 🦗🦗🦗 But when it's a Muslim event? Suddenly it's "takeover" this and "erosion of British culture" that. We all see the pattern. https://t.co/HfBP0Vlepe

    9.4K2.0K73693366K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 202613x their median

    Hindus celebrate a Chariot Festival, coconuts smashed, roads closed, loud music, traditional dress. GB News won't utter a word about a "takeover" or "eroding British culture." But if this was a Muslim procession? They'd be losing their minds. 24/7 outrage. https://t.co/j3YUHVtXiM

    9.0K1.8K87588271K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202610x their median

    Those clowns complaining about this thinking it’s Muslims. Firstly, they’re Ethiopian and Eritrean Christians worshiping. The women also cover their hair with a white cloth. Secondly, do you not see the giant church in front of them? It’s a dead giveaway 🤣 https://t.co/Osh3p9qYTm

    7.8K1.1K9712230K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 202610.0x their median

    🚨BREAKING: Asmongold has been BANNED from Twitch The ban came shortly after comments he made about the situation in Ceuta Twitch hasn't given an official reason yet The clip below is what allegedly got him banned. Judge for yourself if it's ban worthy. Source: Dexerto / Writer: Daniel

    7.2K606783151722K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20268.8x their median

    Did you hear about Jewish man threatening to kill people at 2 mosques? Of course you didn’t. Why? It doesn’t matter. https://t.co/YNdYPctzzz

    5.8K1.8K872244K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20267.4x their median

    Danny Tommo: "Why do Muslims kill the most people?" Muslim: Provides data proving it’s Christians. Danny: "Wait, I meant the last 50 years." Muslim: "That's within the last 50 years, Danny." https://t.co/ZYHey6qY1T

    5.3K99214615158K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20267.0x their median

    Hindu festival currently taking place in the UK. No mention of a takeover, public displays of worship, integration issues etc. Only for Muslims it seems. https://t.co/lKzl8FFkk9

    5.0K84327630124K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20266.8x their median

    A London synagogue hosted an event that advertised land for sale in illegal Israeli settlements. https://t.co/D5mvxeW1lt

    4.2K1.7K573365K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#china#statedinner#trump#xijinping

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 879 interactions against 230K followers, an engagement rate of 0.382%. Measured over 41 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 4.70% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.13% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 41 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 26x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #china, #statedinner, #trump.

What is smile2jannah's engagement rate on X?
smile2jannah (@smile2jannah) has an engagement rate of 0.382%, based on the median interactions across 41 original posts from the last 30 days against 230,076 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.382%, smile2jannah sits above the 50th percentile of the 201,787 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @smile2jannah have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @smile2jannah post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going