Back to @sl1ckr1ck7's profile

RidingAndSquirting engagement report

@sl1ckr1ck7 - 118K followers on X

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
1.73%
of 118K followers
Per impression
3.96%
43K views on a typical post
Reach
43.8%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.7K
interactions (median)
Saved
3.11%
1.3K bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.9/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
23:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 1.7K interactions against 118K followers, an engagement rate of 1.73%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 94% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 43K times each, and 3.96% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 36.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.9 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 68% carry an image or video and 32% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 60K interactions, about 35x its own typical post.

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

RidingAndSquirting's engagement rate beats 94% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 80% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.73%, RidingAndSquirting sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,152 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video68% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link32% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 68% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 32% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 63 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 5, 202635x their median

    Just skip to 1:40 for some insane cock riding skills🔥🍑 https://t.co/jn6U5iGAcK

    55K4.3K8544673K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202622x their median

    Super sexy little blonde fucked good. That cute ass bouncing at 13:45 is so hot 🔥🍑 https://t.co/8ZjYRO28gH

    37K901167706K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 202622x their median

    Good PAWG Jada Stevens squirting from fingering at 2:57 then starts riding his BBC like crazy at 11:55 until her pussy gets filled with cum 🔥🍑💦 https://t.co/9ez87h7Ks1

    36K1.5K2714413K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 202619x their median

    Riding starting at 12:40 is crazy 🔥🍑 https://t.co/Blw5Ov6fFl

    32K1.2K117253K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 202618x their median

    Tatted blonde PAWG with sexy tan lines bouncing on dick at 3:53 has me leaking https://t.co/LbMM2BfQeF

    29K892121663K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20268.3x their median

    OMG this might be the best video of all time. Gorgeous squirting PAWG Martina Smeraldi vs Damion Dayskii's massive black cock. There is so much cock riding and squirting. I love how she constantly slams her pussy down into him to get that huge dick as far inside as it will go. I also love how beautitul and tight her asshole looks even though we've all seen it be ravaged by massive cocks. She can't stop twerking her fat oiled ass all over that cock until she squirts everywhere. The squirting at 26:45 and 29:27 when that ass is going crazy finished me. She's incredible.🔥🍑💦

    13K7431511597K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20267.8x their median

    Amazing riding starting at 9:10 🔥🍑 https://t.co/JOLxYrxY77

    12K654105163K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 20267.2x their median

    Great riding at 11:15 and 15:50 🔥🍑 https://t.co/R60J9wjnxy

    11K75712898K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20266.6x their median

    Insane BBC riding at 11:45 🔥🍑 https://t.co/OQBKxNUvmH

    10K732121085K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20266.5x their median

    Troy fucking 2 squirting blonde PAWGs🔥🍑💦 https://t.co/cIvvppS8ts

    10K69066211K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.7K interactions against 118K followers, an engagement rate of 1.73%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 94% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 43K times each, and 3.96% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 36.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.9 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 68% carry an image or video and 32% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 60K interactions, about 35x its own typical post.

What is RidingAndSquirting's engagement rate on X?
RidingAndSquirting (@sl1ckr1ck7) has an engagement rate of 1.73%, based on the median interactions across 25 original posts from the last 30 days against 118,384 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.73%, RidingAndSquirting sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @sl1ckr1ck7 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 94% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @sl1ckr1ck7 post?
Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.9 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going