Back to @skorusARK's profile

Sam Korus engagement report

@skorusARK - 150K followers on X

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.022%
of 150K followers
Per impression
0.686%
4.9K views on a typical post
Reach
3.26%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
34
interactions (median)
Saved
0.021%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.87/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 34 interactions against 150K followers, an engagement rate of 0.022%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.9K times each, and 0.686% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.26% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.87 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 289 interactions, about 8.5x its own typical post.

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Sam Korus's engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 32% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.022%, Sam Korus sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video56% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link6% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 56% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 6% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 187 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 16, 20268.5x their median

    A clean, electrified energy system has been a dream for decades. Thirty years ago the core components existed, but they weren't economical. That has changed. Chips, batteries, power electronics, motors and sensors have each fallen over 97% in price. It's best to recognise a shift early. Second best is to act on it when it's staring us in the face.

    2076511612K viewsView on X
  • Jun 4, 20265.1x their median

    It's not rocket science. ~$19M in connectivity revenue per Tbps 61 Tbps per Starship launch $19M * 61 = ~$1 billion in rev per starship launch Falcon 9 launched 165 times last year. The revenue per Tbps will decay, that's ok and expected. https://t.co/T9lyjIhFqd

    1371810926K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20264.8x their median

    Avg age of car on the road is >12 years. Pace of software improvement is going vertical. imo,if you buy a car that can't update it's software, it's going to feel like it's 60 years old in 12 years even if the engine and gears are fine.

    14741026.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20264.7x their median

    Guy who just got passed: “I think we should all slow down a bit” Literally saw this on training runs in high school, funny to see it in a multi trillion dollar industry.

    1438738.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20264.3x their median

    The US is producing more drone companies than actual drones.

    13437313K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20263.8x their median

    T-mobile CEO when asked to do his best BlackBerry exec impersonation: https://t.co/ToDlpYRkJ8

    112510354K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20262.3x their median

    Buffett: Be greedy when other are fearful US labs: fearful China labs:

    7233016K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20261.7x their median

    If you’re starting school and want to go down a rabbit hole on something that could be hitting an inflection point by ~graduation, I’d look at: 1. Brain computer interfaces 2. Physical AI and robotics 3. Digital biology 4. Moon, Mars, and space infrastructure There are tons of different ways to contribute to each.

    563005.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20261.7x their median

    The anti-data-center backlash rhymes with the pro-socialist turn. Not because the issues are the same. Because the mistake from "the elite" feels the same: dismiss the grievance instead of understanding the bargain people think they’re being offered. You don’t win people over by dunking on them as too dumb to see the upside of AI or capitalism. I think Thiel’s point on socialism applies here: if student debt and housing costs keep people from accumulating capital, don’t be surprised when they become less pro-capitalist. For people inside tech, the pie is growing faster than ever. For many communities, the pie has not grown in the same way, that's a very different starting point to take into account.

    481636.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20261.7x their median

    Elitism often disguises itself as precaution: those who already have abundance are unusually comfortable rationing progress. Can go ahead and bucket AI doomerism with NIMBYism and anti GMO The future can be and will be amazing if we choose to make it so. AI will likely transform billions of people’s lives for the better.

    457506.1K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 34 interactions against 150K followers, an engagement rate of 0.022%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.9K times each, and 0.686% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.26% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.87 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 289 interactions, about 8.5x its own typical post.

What is Sam Korus's engagement rate on X?
Sam Korus (@skorusARK) has an engagement rate of 0.022%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 149,735 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.022%, Sam Korus sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @skorusARK have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @skorusARK post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going