💕Siswet💕allmylinks.com/siswet engagement report
@siswet - 473K followers on X
Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 847 interactions against 473K followers, an engagement rate of 0.179%. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 3.80% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.71% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 94% carry an image or video and 97% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 13K interactions, about 15x its own typical post.
Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.179%, 💕Siswet💕allmylinks.com/siswet sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,313 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.677%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.677% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 94% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 97% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 94% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 97% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 158 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 25, 202615x their median
💖 Still telling yourself “later”? Later could mean missing the deal completely. Come inside while the offer is still live. 😘 https://t.co/5MfxTxkgcX https://t.co/FdLlqlUvpZ
- Sep 18, 20266.2x their median
💗 For anyone who likes discovering something different… You might want to save this one. 😉 https://t.co/5MfxTxkgcX https://t.co/TaDh9V1j8L
- Oct 20, 20266.1x their median
You're aroused seeing this and you don't know why. Find out the reason why here ⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://t.co/5MfxTxkO2v https://t.co/JWJDrgNS6e
- Sep 20, 20266.1x their median
Can you help me reach my womb? https://t.co/5MfxTxkO2v https://t.co/VKtwG1He3a
- Oct 21, 20265.9x their median
A groundbreaking treatment pairing auditory tones with mild electrical shocks rewires the brain to quiet chronic tinnitus. Chronic tinnitus, the agonizing perception of ringing in the ears without an external sound source, affects millions worldwide and has long eluded effective medical intervention. However, innovative research in neuroscience shows that bimodal neuromodulation—a technique combining audio tones with gentle electrical stimulation delivered directly to the tongue—can effectively quiet these phantom sounds. By stimulating touch receptors on the tongue while simultaneously playing targeted acoustic signals through headphones, the treatment leverages the brain's natural neuroplasticity. This dual-sensory approach encourages the central nervous system to reframe its sensory processing, essentially retraining the brain to ignore hyperactive auditory signals. In a landmark clinical study involving over 300 adults suffering from chronic subjective tinnitus, more than 86% of compliant participants experienced a significant reduction in symptom severity following 12 weeks of daily treatment. Remarkably, these therapeutic benefits persisted for up to 12 months post-treatment, representing a major leap forward in long-term tinnitus care. Described by patients as feeling like a mild fizzing sensation on the tongue, this non-invasive therapy offers a promising and safe alternative to traditional management strategies, bringing renewed hope to millions seeking lasting relief. source: Conlon, B., Langguth, B., Hamilton, C., Hughes, S., Meade, E., Connor, C. O., Schecklmann, M., Hall, D. A., Toal, P. D., & Lim, H. H.. Bimodal neuromodulation combining sound and tongue stimulation reduces tinnitus symptoms in a large randomized clinical study. Science Translational Medicine, 12(564).
- Sep 19, 20264.9x their median
just popping up to make your night a little more interesting 😉 https://t.co/5MfxTxkgcX https://t.co/g06A8tcrpF
- Sep 17, 20264.3x their median
🌙 Late-night plans? I might have just found the perfect addition to yours. 😉 https://t.co/5MfxTxkgcX https://t.co/bLuAuaw8uJ
- Sep 2, 20264.3x their median
Do you want to put your hand inside too? https://t.co/5MfxTxkO2v https://t.co/BDIkiIbLOS
- Sep 16, 20263.6x their median
come see what all the curiosity is about 😏 https://t.co/5MfxTxkO2v https://t.co/n0JhtJD1lC
- Oct 19, 20263.3x their median
Wanna go somewhere and have fun? Join us here ⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://t.co/5MfxTxkgcX https://t.co/9zv4JsWyAo
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 847 interactions against 473K followers, an engagement rate of 0.179%. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 3.80% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.71% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 94% carry an image or video and 97% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 13K interactions, about 15x its own typical post.
- What is 💕Siswet💕allmylinks.com/siswet's engagement rate on X?
- 💕Siswet💕allmylinks.com/siswet (@siswet) has an engagement rate of 0.179%, based on the median interactions across 33 original posts from the last 30 days against 472,977 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.179%, 💕Siswet💕allmylinks.com/siswet sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,313 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @siswet have real engagement?
- There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
- When does @siswet post?
- Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.37 posts per day across the measured window.