Back to @simerazzi's profile

Simerazzi engagement report

@simerazzi - 367K followers on X

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.09%
of 367K followers
Per impression
1.93%
17K views on a typical post
Reach
4.70%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
332
interactions (median)
Saved
0.006%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.43/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 332 interactions against 367K followers, an engagement rate of 0.09%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 51% of 4,213 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 1.93% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.70% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 30% carry an image or video and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 21K interactions, about 64x its own typical post.

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Simerazzi's engagement rate beats 51% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,213 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 62% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.09%, Simerazzi sits above the 50th percentile of the 40,742 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.082% to 0.443%.

p100.002%
p250.013%
p50 (median)0.082%
p750.443%
p902.07%
p99145.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 40,742 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 90,915 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.013%
50th percentile0.082%
75th percentile0.443%
90th percentile2.07%
99th percentile145.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%57K
01:00 UTC-2%58K
02:00 UTC-3%56K
03:00 UTC-3%60K
04:00 UTC-6%48K
05:00 UTC-4%47K
06:00 UTC-4%54K
07:00 UTC-4%58K
08:00 UTC-4%68K
09:00 UTC-4%79K
10:00 UTC-3%81K
11:00 UTC-3%88K
12:00 UTC-2%97K
13:00 UTC-2%106K
14:00 UTC-4%109K
15:00 UTC-2%113K
16:00 UTC-3%110K
17:00 UTC-3%102K
18:00 UTC-2%95K
19:00 UTC-2%90K
20:00 UTC-1%84K
21:00 UTC-1%74K
22:00 UTC-1%64K
23:00 UTC-1%57K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%251K
Monday+1%321K
Tuesday-3%343K
Wednesday-4%299K
Thursday-2%260K
Friday-3%272K
Saturday+3%245K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 26, 202664x their median

    HOLY SHIT. During a memorial for Gaza’s children in Portland, a JEWISH man attacked a woman, knocking her to the ground and kicking her. These people have no shame. https://t.co/wP9CbYPQFl

    15K5.0K1.0K244486K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202631x their median

    Sana gurban olurum https://t.co/14dihXzsGa

    10.0K300106122K viewsView on X
  • Feb 17, 202411x their median

    Yaramazdı, oburdu, inanılmaz sevecendi benim oğlum. Meraklıydı, zıpırdı. Ruhi adında bir görünmez arkadaşı vardı arada onunla oynardı. Günde 1 sefer yemek yer, sadece musluktan su içerdi. O bizi çok sevdi, biz de onu. Umarım seni mutlu edebilmişizdir Pide. Canım oğlum. https://t.co/Y0bog7rtlG

    3.5K131683498K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20264.7x their median

    https://t.co/8ndT9tKn7U

    1.5K762126K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20263.5x their median

    Şu var ya. Çok güzel ha. İndirim falan kovalayıp alın mutlaka https://t.co/DT61IBIemd

    1.1K2303115K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20261.9x their median

    Nene Asensio ve Levent i bi 15 dk önce alabilir, maçı başka bi noktaya getirebilirdi; getirmiyor. Yazık bu kulübe ya

    5901613027K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 2026

    Fatih Altaylı: “Dün Bodrum’da bir yemekte Bodrum’un en iyi otellerinden ve birinin genel müdürü ile aynı masada bir araya geldik. ‘Nasıl geçti sezon?’ diye sordum. Masaya nazardan korumak için işaret parmağının eklemiyle üç kere vurdu, ‘En iyi sezonumuz diyebilirim. Bir de pandemi çıkışında böyle olmuştu ama bu hepsinden iyi’ dedi. Yemek sonrasında ise kalabalık bir sohbet ortamında, Bodrum’da yatırım yapan birkaç kişi ile ayaküstü sohbet ettik. Tüm lüks mekanların hayatlarının cirosunu yaptığını söylüyor herkes. Bodrum’da biri deniz kenarı, biri şehrin içinde iki yeri olan bir işletmeci ‘Haziran ortasına kadar korku dolu günler geçirdik ama sonra gerçek bir patlama yaşandı. Kaliteli her yer dolu. Fiyatlar yüksek ama boş yok. İki yeni mekan var. St. Tropez’den, Mikonos’tan daha pahalılar ve arasanız yer bulamazsınız. Her gece dolular’ diye anlattı. Müşterilerin yaklaşık %30’u yabancı, %70’i yerli turistmiş. Bodrum’un bu durumu yatırımcıların da gözünden kaçmamış. Önümüzdeki yıl büyük bir ihtimalle Mikonos’un en popüler, en pahalı ve giderek en kıro mekanı haline gelen Nammos ve belki birkaç başka marka eğlence yeri de Bodrum’da olacak. Bu yıl Turizm Bakanı Mehmet Ersoy’un otelinde yer alan Mikonoslu Scorpios, mal sahibi Bakan ile yaşadığı sorunlardan ötürü Bodrum’u terk etmişti. Scorpios bu verimli sezonu kaçırdı ama iddialara göre önümüzdeki yıl aynı yerde yeniden açılacakmış. Scorpios için devreye girenlerden biri de ABD Büyükelçisi Tom Barrack olmuş. Ayrıca Scorpios’un sahibi olan Soho Grubu Bodrum’da, Soho adıyla bir başka yer açmayı da planlıyormuş. Görünen o ki, Bodrum giderek St. Tropez, Porto Cervo, Mikonos gibi Akdeniz’in ultra lüks beldelerinden biri olma yolunda ilerliyor. Gördüğüm kadarıyla belediye de buna göre bir hazırlık yapmış ve bu gelişme ile uyumlu görünüyor. Umarım birileri çelme takmaz.”

    3231155751.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 2026

    Akın Gürlek: "En başta bu dava açıldığında ‘Bu yargılama canlı yayında yayınlansın, kendimize güveniyoruz’ gibi bir söylem vardı. Şu anda ben Ekrem bey acaba aynı tavır içinde olur mu diye sormak istiyorum" https://t.co/lY3gyjSYwz

    137202143562K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 2026

    bu mehmet türkmen, yasin kol falan bunlar nasıl bu seviye hakem oluyor anlamak mümkün değil.

    380109116K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 2026

    Fenerbahçe’nin kötülüğünü isteyen bin beter olsun. Hayırlı geceler

    381111115K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 332 interactions against 367K followers, an engagement rate of 0.09%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 51% of 4,213 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 1.93% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.70% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 30% carry an image or video and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 21K interactions, about 64x its own typical post.

What is Simerazzi's engagement rate on X?
Simerazzi (@simerazzi) has an engagement rate of 0.09%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 367,293 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.09%, Simerazzi sits above the 50th percentile of the 40,742 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @simerazzi have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 51% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,213 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @simerazzi post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.43 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going