Brian Brushwood engagement report
@shwood - 1.4M followers on X
Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 12 interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 12% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 0.067% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.32% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 13% carry an image or video and 88% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 1255x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #miltkahl, #seedance.
Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026. Recurring tags: #miltkahl, #seedance.
Compared with accounts its own size
Brian Brushwood's engagement rate beats 12% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 4% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.001%, Brian Brushwood sits below the 10th percentile of the 156,282 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.003% |
| 25th percentile | 0.022% |
| 50th percentile | 0.127% |
| 75th percentile | 0.604% |
| 90th percentile | 2.32% |
| 99th percentile | 83.1% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 13% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 88% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -8% | -9% to -7% | 41K |
- 13% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 88% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 75 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 3, 20261255x their median
we got hit with a crazy scam attempt someone signed up for our inference and did a video call with our sales person confirming intent to spend $400,000 over the next year and asked for increased rate limits our sales person felt like something was off so he looked up the company - found a bunch of videos of the CEO and it looked and sounded like the same person he talked to so he figured it was real but we started looking deeper the email they had been talking to us from was a lookalike domain that was registered 4 days ago. all the traffic they were sending looked bizarre and came from foreign IPs emailed them for more info to see what they'd say. of course they hit us with the "i'm about to get on a plane, can't do anything right now, please move forward" messaged the real CEO on instagram and yeah he had no idea what we were talking about, the scammer was deepfaking him be careful out there, things are getting crazy
- Jun 25, 2026172x their median
It's hard to believe Arclight Hollywood has been abandoned for 6 years. 14 screen multiplex on Sunset Blvd just sitting empty frozen in March 2020... It was the highest grossing theater in USA. So strange. @ArcLightCinemas https://t.co/agkD2GWN1F
- Sep 2, 202640x their median
The amount of money Americans lost in scams hit a record high of almost $16 billion in 2025. And while federal efforts seek to address the problem, thousands of Americans scammed every day never get their money back. https://t.co/zJBVRg0ufr
- Jul 19, 202625x their median
At a diner, and I asked for soy sauce for my steak and eggs. I got a blank stare like I was the first person to suggest such a thing. Does nobody else do soy sauce on steak and eggs? Is that not a thing? Because it’s amazing.
- Sep 20, 202616x their median
I just finished the second episode of Widows Bay. Holy shit this show rules.
- Sep 23, 202615x their median
Welcome to Modern Rogue World Headquarters! Make yourself at home. This guy did. https://t.co/p69cvMoi9S
- Jul 31, 202611x their median
The cancellation of season 2 of Wonder Man is an incredible encapsulation of all the lessons we learned from season 1 of Wonder Man. Maybe it's secretly viral marketing for it.
- Aug 2, 20268.2x their median
There's $70 Billion of unclaimed property in the USA. Money owed to people (you), but it's money that's juuust enough of a pain in the ass to collect that it just sits there. 1/
- Sep 22, 20267.4x their median
https://t.co/ZyGg0BFQlF https://t.co/8YezCMhgtw
- Jul 20, 20267.1x their median
okay, fine. The Pitt's a good show.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 12 interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 12% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 0.067% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.32% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 13% carry an image or video and 88% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 1255x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #miltkahl, #seedance.
- What is Brian Brushwood's engagement rate on X?
- Brian Brushwood (@shwood) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 32 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,358,580 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.001%, Brian Brushwood sits below the 10th percentile of the 156,282 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @shwood have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 12% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @shwood post?
- Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.57 posts per day across the measured window.