PlayerSells
Back to @shwood's profile

Brian Brushwood engagement report

@shwood - 1.4M followers on X

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 20, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 1.4M followers
Per impression
0.052%
23K views on a typical post
Reach
1.70%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
12
interactions (median)
Saved
0.004%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.13/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 12 interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 12% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 0.052% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.70% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 9% are part of a thread and 83% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.8K interactions, about 230x its own typical post.

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 20, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Brian Brushwood's engagement rate beats 12% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 3% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, Brian Brushwood sits above the 10th percentile of the 10,326 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.007%.

p100.001%
p250.007%
p50 (median)0.048%
p750.321%
p902.48%
p99354.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 10,326 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 442,521 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.007%
50th percentile0.048%
75th percentile0.321%
90th percentile2.48%
99th percentile354.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC0%15K
01:00 UTC+4%15K
02:00 UTC-1%14K
03:00 UTC-2%15K
04:00 UTC-5%12K
05:00 UTC-5%12K
06:00 UTC-7%13K
07:00 UTC-6%14K
08:00 UTC-7%17K
09:00 UTC-2%19K
10:00 UTC-2%20K
11:00 UTC-2%22K
12:00 UTC-1%24K
13:00 UTC+1%27K
14:00 UTC-2%29K
15:00 UTC-1%30K
16:00 UTC-1%30K
17:00 UTC-1%28K
18:00 UTC+1%25K
19:00 UTC0%24K
20:00 UTC0%22K
21:00 UTC+1%19K
22:00 UTC+1%17K
23:00 UTC+1%15K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+8%59K
Monday+8%72K
Tuesday+1%94K
Wednesday-4%78K
Thursday-3%71K
Friday-5%73K
Saturday+2%64K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+79%+73% to +85%5.8K
Outbound link83% of posts-49%-50% to -47%6.1K
Typical length--7%-8% to -5%9.0K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 79% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 83% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 49% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 108 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 7% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 25, 2026230x their median

    It's hard to believe Arclight Hollywood has been abandoned for 6 years. 14 screen multiplex on Sunset Blvd just sitting empty frozen in March 2020... It was the highest grossing theater in USA. So strange. @ArcLightCinemas https://t.co/agkD2GWN1F

    2.4K2626754241K viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 202625x their median

    At a diner, and I asked for soy sauce for my steak and eggs. I got a blank stare like I was the first person to suggest such a thing. Does nobody else do soy sauce on steak and eggs? Is that not a thing? Because it’s amazing.

    1247163535K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 202611x their median

    The cancellation of season 2 of Wonder Man is an incredible encapsulation of all the lessons we learned from season 1 of Wonder Man. Maybe it's secretly viral marketing for it.

    109413143K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 20268.2x their median

    There's $70 Billion of unclaimed property in the USA. Money owed to people (you), but it's money that's juuust enough of a pain in the ass to collect that it just sits there. 1/

    78414245K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20267.1x their median

    okay, fine. The Pitt's a good show.

    69511029K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 20266.3x their median

    What's something you're crazy excited about? Like your thoughts just keep magnetically drift back to it?

    27141743K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20265.3x their median

    I'm doing my stage magic show in Daytona Beach, FL this friday. Anyone want to come?

    48510032K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 20262.8x their median

    Seems like there should be a fun fantasy-football-like "Summer Movie Draft" to compete over big blockbuster movie returns... https://t.co/hH6x8pPNEb

    2354123K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20262.7x their median

    Company Offering ‘100% Human-Written, Never AI’ Medical Research Is Entirely AI: https://t.co/WkoHMq09UY

    2552021K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20262.6x their median

    Netflix Has a YouTube Problem (Cordkillers #614) https://t.co/YlWXwfCSDY

    2533027K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 12 interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 12% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 0.052% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.70% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 9% are part of a thread and 83% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.8K interactions, about 230x its own typical post.

What is Brian Brushwood's engagement rate on X?
Brian Brushwood (@shwood) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 23 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,361,317 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, Brian Brushwood sits above the 10th percentile of the 10,326 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @shwood have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 12% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @shwood post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going