Back to @shibburn's profile

Shibburn engagement report

@shibburn - 395K followers on X

Measured over 139 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.006%
of 395K followers
Per impression
0.631%
3.6K views on a typical post
Reach
0.92%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
23
interactions (median)
Saved
0.027%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.63/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 23 interactions against 395K followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 139 original posts, its engagement rate beats 27% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.6K times each, and 0.631% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.922% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 139 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 188 interactions, about 8.2x its own typical post.

Measured over 139 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026. Recurring tag: #shib.

Compared with accounts its own size

Shibburn's engagement rate beats 27% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 36% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.006%, Shibburn sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video98% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link1% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 98% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 1% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 66 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 31, 20268.2x their median

    🔥 22,698,304 $SHIB burned in the past 24 hours. https://t.co/3ZbO393xR9

    161233111K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20265.8x their median

    Will be changing the name soon. The https://t.co/qLBGSroZi9 website will remain available for anyone who wants to monitor $SHIB burns in real time, and we'll continue posting burn activity here. But soon, things are going to look a little different. We'll also start covering some of the other popular assets.

    11020308.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20265.5x their median

    For anyone asking: The address ending in 'c4ce' is $SHIB's contract address. It's considered a burn simply because there is no mechanism to retrieve anything sent to it, meaning those tokens are permanently gone. We also monitor 30+ official burn addresses and contracts in Ethereum. Burns that happen outside of those addresses, such as BNB burns, are also accounted for, but we only reflect those as being removed from the circulating supply. There is nothing wrong with the circulating supply we reported. We are currently the only ones giving you a more accurate count of remaining supply.

    106192011K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20265.2x their median

    🔥 338,051 $SHIB burned in the past 24 hours. https://t.co/6Kkf3uxjjy

    1099107.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20264.3x their median

    Top 10 $SHIB burners this week 🔥 #shib https://t.co/v3IsKM07xV

    8611117.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20264.2x their median

    In the past hour, there have been a total of 67,961,165 $SHIB tokens burned (1 transaction) Tens of millions of SHIB just took a permanent vacation. #shib https://t.co/Mo9RQiaLLF

    8110324.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20264.1x their median

    🔥 14,975,829 $SHIB burned in the past 24 hours. https://t.co/YNvJpiKEsy

    8110309.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20263.9x their median

    In the past hour, there have been a total of 1,670,592 $SHIB tokens burned (2 transactions) #shib https://t.co/KBlOaMR5td

    7910105.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20263.7x their median

    🔥 4,132,000 $SHIB burned in the past 24 hours. https://t.co/7sRJH6c2vB

    7410008.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20263.4x their median

    In the past hour, there have been a total of 1,500,000 $SHIB tokens burned (1 transaction) #shib https://t.co/Rzn58lnSCg

    708105.4K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#shib

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 23 interactions against 395K followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 139 original posts, its engagement rate beats 27% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.6K times each, and 0.631% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.922% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 139 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 188 interactions, about 8.2x its own typical post.

What is Shibburn's engagement rate on X?
Shibburn (@shibburn) has an engagement rate of 0.006%, based on the median interactions across 139 original posts from the last 30 days against 395,108 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.006%, Shibburn sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @shibburn have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 27% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @shibburn post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going