Back to @shellieblum's profile

Shellie Blum engagement report

@shellieblum - 203K followers on X

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.003%
of 203K followers
Per impression
1.39%
360 views on a typical post
Reach
0.18%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
5
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.07/day
active 7% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Friday

Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 5 interactions against 203K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Posts are seen about 360 times each, and 1.39% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.178% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.07 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 264K interactions, about 52880x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.003%, Shellie Blum sits below the 10th percentile of the 199,274 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.668%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 199,274 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.668%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 66 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Apr 17, 202652880x their median

    Universal HIGH INCOME via checks issued by the Federal government is the best way to deal with unemployment caused by AI. AI/robotics will produce goods & services far in excess of the increase in the money supply, so there will not be inflation.

    189K20K45K10K70M viewsView on X
  • Apr 21, 202621266x their median

    BREAKING: The Islamic Republic is preparing to hang eight women. Not a word from the international community or so-called human rights organizations. https://t.co/aBKxkjbdym

    65K34K4.5K2.6K3.2M viewsView on X
  • Apr 16, 20262206x their median

    “Greatness does not come out of intelligence, it comes from character. Character is not formed out of smart people: it is formed out of people who have suffered.” — Nvidia CEO, Jensen Huang https://t.co/o1QHxETTXP

    9.0K1.8K120120343K viewsView on X
  • Apr 8, 20261718x their median

    💯🎯 Fuck the system https://t.co/5ILKEbzR79

    6.4K1.8K3019461K viewsView on X
  • Apr 16, 20261184x their median

    Yes he nailed this !! https://t.co/YWMZr0hyBN

    4.0K1.7K10568192K viewsView on X
  • Apr 18, 20261061x their median

    How many of my friends can say that they waited for this cliffhanger? https://t.co/L9QsoSBFzS

    4.4K197670871.2M viewsView on X
  • Apr 6, 20261056x their median

    Without thinking they WERE a boy😁 https://t.co/yh8tWs7I2x

    4.4K5313247436K viewsView on X
  • Apr 9, 2026969x their median

    Dear @ElonMusk, I’ve been on this platform since 2009, just like you. Over 100,000 posts, just like you. Years of time, effort, and engagement. And now? I can’t even reach 5% of my own followers. We're losing followers daily while your .@X algorithm buries our voices. What’s the point of this platform if people can’t even reach the audience that chose to follow them? I’ve never seen it this bad. What's being done to this platform isn’t just wrong, it's cowardice. Stop silencing people.

    3.3K1.0K399107124K viewsView on X
  • Apr 8, 2026932x their median

    gentle reminder https://t.co/OWtx3J9GT6

    3.8K787592382K viewsView on X
  • Apr 19, 2026535x their median

    Feminism usually gets blamed for devaluing motherhood and stay-at-home-moms. But NO ONE is more disrespectful of stay-at-home motherhood than rightwing patriarchy bros. It’s almost like they just don’t want women to be able to win. Work outside the home, and you’re a feminist shill. Stay home with your kids, and you’re a privileged non-contributing freeloader. They don’t want you to vote because you can’t be drafted in the military, but if you join the Army of your own volition, they’ll accuse you of trying to be a man and make it crystal clear you’re not welcome there either. These guys need Jesus.

    2.1K25326234162K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 5 interactions against 203K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Posts are seen about 360 times each, and 1.39% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.178% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.07 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 264K interactions, about 52880x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Shellie Blum's engagement rate on X?
Shellie Blum (@shellieblum) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 202,532 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.003%, Shellie Blum sits below the 10th percentile of the 199,274 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @shellieblum have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @shellieblum post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going