Back to @shelbystardust's profile

shelbystardust engagement report

@shelbystardust - 99K followers on X

Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 18, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
2.02%
of 99K followers
Per impression
7.33%
26K views on a typical post
Reach
27.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.9K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.146%
38 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.07/day
active 80% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 1.9K interactions against 99K followers, an engagement rate of 2.02%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 95% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 26K times each, and 7.33% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 26.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 8.3x its own typical post.

Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 18, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

shelbystardust's engagement rate beats 95% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 93% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 2.02%, shelbystardust sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 153 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 21, 20268.3x their median

    since the racists are flooding my page today, -BLACK CHILDREN DESERVE TO GROW UP. -THE PRISON SYSTEM WAS CREATED TO REPLACE SLAVERY. -AMERICA IS AND ALWAYS HAS BEEN A RACIST COUNTRY. stay mad you hateful freaks https://t.co/KMhQZZ8g77

    12K1.5K2.4K129384K viewsView on X
  • Jun 10, 202611x their median

    I met one of my biggest online haters IRL. He pretended to be a fan. He and his friend came up to me at an event and told me they recognized me & loved my work. I thanked them and told them to pull up their X accounts so I could follow them. I instantly recognized his username. This man had called me a whøre, a slut, a libtard, you name it. But why was he simping to my face? Because in the real world, every MAGA incel is a little coward bıtch who stands for absolutely nothing.

    14K75778748376K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20263.3x their median

    GOOD MORNING to everyone who’s not a beta cuck politician ball guzzling MAGA moron 🤗 https://t.co/1tCBAicRQ5

    5.4K1337951288K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20262.3x their median

    I plan to honor Dolly Parton’s legacy by giving to charity, standing up for human rights, and being kind to all whilst having gigantic boobs 🫶 https://t.co/xrbrsTkect

    4.1K100271961K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20262.2x their median

    GOOD MORNING to everyone who has the guts to call what Israel is doing a GENOCIDE. https://t.co/lPRhV8zGee

    3.7K2302581356K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20262.1x their median

    Gas is $7/gallon where I live right now. THANKS, TRUMP 🤗 https://t.co/01NvkOBObR

    2.6K1581.3K1965K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20261.9x their median

    Hi! I’m Shelby. I enjoy ragebaiting sexists, racists, and bigots and exposing them for the sick fucks they truly are. I’m also a professional oil painter 👩🏻‍🎨🎨 If you’re new here, welcome!! https://t.co/7nh69kMUQi

    3.2K1153871548K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20261.8x their median

    Slap my ass and call me radical but I would actually like my taxes to be used to help people in America instead of kill people in other countries. https://t.co/UTXuepRSCQ

    3.0K111334952K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20261.7x their median

    HAPPY SUNDAY to everyone who knows that Jesus Christ would’ve fucking hated Donald Trump https://t.co/zCoSBcKh56

    2.4K1067602340K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20261.6x their median

    Day 80 of sharing my paintings until pedophile defenders stop trying to cancel me https://t.co/A8t9Be7z8m

    2.7K126220438K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.9K interactions against 99K followers, an engagement rate of 2.02%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 95% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 26K times each, and 7.33% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 26.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 8.3x its own typical post.

What is shelbystardust's engagement rate on X?
shelbystardust (@shelbystardust) has an engagement rate of 2.02%, based on the median interactions across 30 original posts from the last 30 days against 98,528 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 2.02%, shelbystardust sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @shelbystardust have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 95% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @shelbystardust post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going