Back to @shazbkhanzdaGEO's profile

Shahzeb Khanzada engagement report

@shazbkhanzdaGEO - 3.6M followers on X

Measured over 48 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.01%
of 3.6M followers
Per impression
1.33%
28K views on a typical post
Reach
0.78%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
372
interactions (median)
Saved
0.03%
8 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.1/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 372 interactions against 3.6M followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 48 original posts, its engagement rate beats 36% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 1.33% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.777% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 48 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 59x its own typical post.

Measured over 48 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Shahzeb Khanzada's engagement rate beats 36% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 57% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.01%, Shahzeb Khanzada sits above the 10th percentile of the 155,901 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.127%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 155,901 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,040 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.127%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 243 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Dec 28, 201759x their median

    Gender is nt something to b proud of,nor it is somthng to b ashamed of. Ppl like Musharaf who try to use it fr thr advantage n to ridicule othrs must b ashamed of thr behaviour. Pakistan is thankful to great women like Fatima Jinnah,Benazir,Malala etc. https://t.co/y0UJgvsg24

    15K3.0K3.9K460View on X
  • Aug 8, 202610x their median

    میر رضا نے خودکشی نہیں کی، بلکہ تشدد کے بعد بیہمانہ قتل کیا گیا ہے۔ وہ ایک مظلوم شہید تھا، جو زندگی سے بھرپور تھا۔ معزز عدالت اور اسپیشل میڈیکل بورڈ کا شکریہ، جنہوں نے اپنے قانونی اور پیشہ ورانہ فرائض سرانجام دیتے ہوئے میر رضا پر لگائے گئے تمام بہتان جھوٹے ثابت کر دیے۔ https://t.co/ECtZlrIa4S

    2.7K1.1K7953104K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202610x their median

    The mishandling of Mir Raza Ali’s investigation by the police is a clear indication that the perpetrators are being protected.. Karachi’s youth has had enough, we deserve total fairness.

    3.1K627271060K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20267.7x their median

    نہ سپریم کورٹ کے حکم کے مطابق شفا انٹرنیشنل اسپتال لےگئے نہ ڈاکٹرفیصل سلطان کوملنے دیا۔ دیکھیے کل رات حکومت نے عمران خان کے ساتھ کیا کیا۔ https://t.co/Pd7ZVWCqta

    2.3K528401114K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20267.6x their median

    لاہور کے ٹاؤن شپ تھانے میں دو خواتین کی حراست کے چند گھنٹوں میں پراسرار موت۔موت ،ڈرگ اوور ڈوز سے ہوئی۔پولیس کا دعویٰ ، اہلِ خانہ کا تشدد کا الزام۔ پوسٹ مارٹم رپورٹ کا انتظار، مگر سوال برقرار آخر پولیس حراست میں وہ دو تین گھنٹے میں کیا ہوا؟ تفصیلات دیکھیے https://t.co/YWrcFndMFR

    2.0K7546842153K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20267.3x their median

    The cover up attempt has failed. Mir Raza Ali’s second post-mortem report has confirmed all the questions and concerns that had been raised. He was shot in the back and subjected to severe torture. https://t.co/N7WBgNjZlB

    2.0K6537546161K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20266.5x their median

    A mother and a father first had to go to court to secure a second post-mortem examination of their son. They then had to stand guard at their son’s grave to prevent that very post-mortem from being carried out. Mir Raza Ali’s parents were subjected to one traumatic ordeal after another, only for the same medical board, whose formation had been ordered by the court, to ultimately be reinstated.

    1.7K5609031244K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20266.4x their median

    لاہور میں پولیس حراست میں دو خواتین کی پراسرار موت، ابتدائی پوسٹ مارٹم رپورٹ پر3سینئر ڈاکٹرز کی اہم رائےدیکھئیے۔۔دونوں خواتین کے ایک ساتھ مرنے،ابتدائی پوسٹ مارٹم کا وقت ایک ہی ہونے،ایکسرے نہ ہونےاورایک جیسی رپورٹ آنے اور پولیس کے موقف پرسوالات۔دیکھئیے https://t.co/L35PGR74Ui

    1.8K5662714108K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 20266.2x their median

    یمن میں حوثیوں کے خلاف سعودی افواج لڑ رہی ہیں،اور حو ثیوں سے علاقے واپس لیے ہیں ۔ ترکیے اور پاکستان کی افواج سپورٹ کا کردار ادا کر رہی ہیں۔ حوثیوں نے اسوقت پسپائی اختیار کی ہوئی ہے۔وزیر دفاع خواجہ آصف https://t.co/rE4cakxEnG

    1.9K2778013112K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20265.8x their median

    یمن سے سعودی عرب پر ہونیوالے حملوں سے پاکستان ، سعودی عرب اور ترکیے کا مشترکہ دفاعی معاہدہ آپریشنل ہوگا، ہم معاہدے کے تحت مدد کرنے کے پابند ہیں، خواجہ آصف https://t.co/MS5ukl2fbf

    1.8K2559919130K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 372 interactions against 3.6M followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 48 original posts, its engagement rate beats 36% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 1.33% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.777% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 48 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 59x its own typical post.

What is Shahzeb Khanzada's engagement rate on X?
Shahzeb Khanzada (@shazbkhanzdaGEO) has an engagement rate of 0.01%, based on the median interactions across 48 original posts from the last 30 days against 3,592,762 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.01%, Shahzeb Khanzada sits above the 10th percentile of the 155,901 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @shazbkhanzdaGEO have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 36% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @shazbkhanzdaGEO post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going