Shaun Maguire engagement report
@shaunmmaguire - 394K followers on X
Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1.5K interactions against 394K followers, an engagement rate of 0.378%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 75K times each, and 1.95% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 19.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video and 17% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 12x its own typical post.
Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Shaun Maguire's engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 66% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.378%, Shaun Maguire sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 83% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 83% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 280 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 13, 202612x their median
Lee Kuan Yew explained this… "In multicultural societies you don't vote in accordance with economic or social interests. You vote in accordance with your race and religion." https://t.co/Jxabw15SS6
- Sep 27, 202612x their median
Dear The UK, I love you America and the Western World is indebted to you But you've lost your way Over the last 36 hours a terror plot was disrupted at RAF Fairford And it came out that your gov gave citizenship + protected a senior Hamas terrorist Wake up before you can't https://t.co/3oHrIG8f15
- Aug 24, 20265.6x their median
I went to Texas to investigate the islamic takeover there. The documentary is coming out in October ft @SaraGonzalesTX, here's a glimpse of one interview. Me: Would you agree that teaching 9/11 is Islamophobic? Kenyan migrant: Yeah, I would agree. That's pointing out that this thing was done by these kinds of people. You can destroy a country by whitewashing it's history from within and it's happening right before your eyes.
- Aug 21, 20265.3x their median
“Ayaan Hirsi Ali Gets Confronted on Islamophobia - Her Answer Takes the Debate in a Completely Different Direction” Student : You speak of Islamophobia and classes like Black Studies as phony, ideologically driven things. But what makes white supremacy or Islamophobia different from antisemitism? America imported millions of African slaves, Native Americans faced forced marches and genocide, and Muslims are being massacred in China today. So what makes antisemitism so different? Ayaan Hirsi Ali: Two things. First, America and Western Europe have reckoned with their past. We had slavery, we fought a war and ended it. We had segregation, we fought another major battle and ended it. We had the Civil Rights Movement. And the people leading many of those emancipation movements were Christians inspired by the Bible. Second, antisemitism is the oldest hatred in humanity, and you find it across the entire world. What made the West different was that after nearly exterminating its Jewish population, it looked honestly in the mirror and confronted what it had done. Islamophobia is a made-up word. It's been created by a political movement that wants to exploit Western guilt to achieve its ultimate goal: the revival of the caliphate. And the goal of that movement is to convert people to Islam whether they want to or not. Those who refuse, she says, could face violence. That's part of what I mean by subversion, active measures and asymmetric warfare. The Islamists have become incredibly successful against nations with enormous military and economic power. Islam is spreading. They've regained Afghanistan. They have Iraq. They have Syria. And Muslim governments themselves are afraid of what the Islamist movement could do to them. They're exploiting principles like freedom of speech, freedom of religion and freedom of association. We need to understand that and find a way to preserve our principles while beating the Islamists at their own game. Student : Is there room for compromise between principles? Ayaan Hirsi Ali: If I want to kill you and behead you unless you convert to the religion I dictate, what would be the place of compromise? Student : I wouldn't mind converting, since I'm agnostic, but I understand some people wouldn't share that vision...
- Mar 23, 20265.0x their median
https://t.co/KXLgdhFe1P
- Aug 11, 20264.2x their median
This is subtle but important On a Turkish-American podcast before becoming famous Zohran says that white liberals are primarily driven by ideology Whereas “our community” is more driven by “identity” And that there needs to be a “validator” saying “trust us” to get the white progressives to vote with his “community” It’s a deliberate strategy to deceive, and millions are falling for it https://t.co/WqPAOwsxYY
- Sep 28, 20263.9x their median
After >$15B of development costs (per the S-1) And almost 15 years of research Starship has delivered its first orbital payload She will change the course of humanity https://t.co/oGovy7Hsdw
- Aug 28, 20262.7x their median
Data centers consume less water Than their workers flushing toilets
- Aug 10, 20262.6x their median
CAVAN SULLIVAN 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 https://t.co/2hohiVgRWk
- Aug 28, 20262.6x their median
“I was married to a member of Al-Qaeda AMA” This is what I’m fighting against https://t.co/EPoUbH7rr4
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1.5K interactions against 394K followers, an engagement rate of 0.378%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 75K times each, and 1.95% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 19.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video and 17% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 12x its own typical post.
- What is Shaun Maguire's engagement rate on X?
- Shaun Maguire (@shaunmmaguire) has an engagement rate of 0.378%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 393,804 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.378%, Shaun Maguire sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @shaunmmaguire have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @shaunmmaguire post?
- Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.57 posts per day across the measured window.