Back to @shaunattwood's profile

Shaun Attwood engagement report

@shaunattwood - 161K followers on X

Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.008%
of 161K followers
Per impression
0.658%
2.1K views on a typical post
Reach
1.27%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
14
interactions (median)
Saved
0.049%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 14 interactions against 161K followers, an engagement rate of 0.008%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 18% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.1K times each, and 0.658% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.27% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 97% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 360 interactions, about 26x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #folicacid, #prostatecancer.

Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026. Recurring tags: #folicacid, #prostatecancer.

Compared with accounts its own size

Shaun Attwood's engagement rate beats 18% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 31% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.008%, Shaun Attwood sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video3% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link97% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 3% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 97% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 190 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 26, 202626x their median

    ⚠️ Synthetic lab-made chemical forced into everyday bread, pastry & cereals with NO parliamentary vote, NO individual consent & NO proper debate!! 👉 Sign the 🇬🇧 UK Petition TODAY!! https://t.co/RGTLzRT2vG @ClareCraigPath @james_freeman__ @ukmfa1 https://t.co/tAbvLfSHSR

    1941555639K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 202616x their median

    RIP Paul Ferris, our friend and podcast guest Photo: James Esposito https://t.co/Ctegvg1Hs2

    200151106.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20268.3x their median

    THE TRUTH ABOUT MKULTRA — WITH SURVIVORS DR. JULIETTE ENGEL & CATHY O’BRIEN! https://t.co/qLwyq76g1g

    693410310K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 20266.1x their median

    🔥 MKULTRA, MIND CONTROL & HAVANA SYNDROME! JESSE BELTRAN OF MIND NEXUS! https://t.co/2viFKVOJ1j

    4625862.5K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 20265.8x their median

    Do secret technologies affect human health, privacy, and even the human mind? Find out what JESSE BELTRAN told us here https://t.co/htb1CQHXgd What is the truth behind Havana Syndrome, MKUltra, directed-energy weapons, and allegations of covert surveillance? Shaun Attwood welcomes Jesse Beltran, former firefighter-paramedic, technical surveillance investigator, and co-founder of Mind Nexus. Jesse joins Shaun for a fascinating discussion about government experimentation, MKUltra, Havana Syndrome, nanotechnology, alleged electronic harassment, and emerging technologies that could potentially affect the human nervous system. Through Mind Nexus, Jesse investigates unusual radiofrequency activity using specialized scanning equipment. He’ll share his experiences, findings, and theories surrounding alleged electronic targeting, covert implants, and advanced surveillance technology. Jesse will also discuss MasterPeace, a product promoted for reducing the alleged effects of certain nanomaterials, along with recently published research and what he believes the findings reveal. Are we witnessing groundbreaking discoveries, or are there still more questions than answers? Join Shaun and Jesse for an eye-opening conversation about science, government secrecy, emerging technology, and the search for answers. @MindNexusLive

    4326753.9K viewsView on X
  • Oct 16, 20265.1x their median

    MK ULTRA: Horror behind The EVIL CIA experiments! Laura Knight - Jadczyk https://t.co/cFlsHpGhwN

    4518532.5K viewsView on X
  • Oct 24, 20263.1x their median

    Is Russell Brand Innocent or Guilty? Find out what Russell's ex Georgina Baillie told us here: https://t.co/cHKdVlIlBk Shaun and Jen are joined by the granddaughter of the late Fawlty Towers star Andrew Sachs, Georgina Baillie, to discuss her controversial history with Russell Brand and to tell her story and give her opinion of the allegations made by women against him. Georgina, who was the centre of what was known as 'Sachsgate' in 2008 after Brand and Jonathan Ross left her grandfather a voicemail revealing her relationship with Brand, believes that survivors need to be heard and that she sympathises as a survivor herself. #podcast #truecrime #russellbrand #uk #news #london #trial #celebrity #law @rustyrockets

    13525011K viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 20262.9x their median

    ILLUMINATI INSIDER EXPOSES ROYALS, VATICAN, FREEMASONS...- LEO ZAGAMI Part 2! https://t.co/PWYpOpwAlf

    2612032.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20262.9x their median

    🔥 I FILMED INSIDE BOHEMIAN GROVE! SECRET RITUALS EXPOSED! — DANCER LIVE! AU https://t.co/I7lAHCtjvp

    2912005.2K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 20262.4x their median

    TONY RODRIGUES - THE CHILDREN OF MK ULTRA - THE EXPERIMENTS https://t.co/3RYDO5Ptzi

    1913111.9K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#folicacid#prostatecancer

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 14 interactions against 161K followers, an engagement rate of 0.008%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 18% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.1K times each, and 0.658% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.27% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 97% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 360 interactions, about 26x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #folicacid, #prostatecancer.

What is Shaun Attwood's engagement rate on X?
Shaun Attwood (@shaunattwood) has an engagement rate of 0.008%, based on the median interactions across 36 original posts from the last 30 days against 161,339 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.008%, Shaun Attwood sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @shaunattwood have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 18% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @shaunattwood post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going