Back to @senjaamu's profile

Sore, Langit! engagement report

@senjaamu - 82K followers on X

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.472%
of 82K followers
Per impression
4.19%
9.2K views on a typical post
Reach
11.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
388
interactions (median)
Saved
0.276%
26 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.57/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 388 interactions against 82K followers, an engagement rate of 0.472%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 78% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 9.2K times each, and 4.19% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 13% carry an image or video and 6% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 66x its own typical post.

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Sore, Langit!'s engagement rate beats 78% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 81% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.472%, Sore, Langit! sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video13% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 13% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 140 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jan 9, 202666x their median

    barangkali nanti, doakan saja mimpi-mimpi kecil itu.

    19K6.6K2694378K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 202613x their median

    di antara hari-hari yang tidak kuceritakan, aku menyimpan banyak cemas dan takut di sana. jika kamu melihatku tetap tenang, percayalah di dalam kepalaku ada suara berisik yang tidak mampu kuredakan.

    3.3K1.7K24160K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 202611x their median

    tetaplah hidup, meski hanya untuk kehilangan demi kehilangan.

    2.8K1.2K185782K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20262.9x their median

    "terima kasih, ya." "untuk apa?" "untuk tidak menyerah atas hidupmu. untuk mimpi-mimpi kecil yang kamu usahakan. untuk doa-doa yang masih terus kamu aminkan meski rasanya terlalu mustahil."

    7683291816K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20262.1x their median

    Kita pernah menghadapi ketakutan yang lebih besar daripada hari ini, dan seperti kemarin—kita hadapi saja.

    5372821516K viewsView on X
  • Jul 26, 20262.1x their median

    beberapa perjalanan mungkin memang harus ditempuh sendirian.

    5452599620K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20262.0x their median

    "bagaimana cara mengikhlaskan?" "sederhana, kamu hanya perlu kehilangan berkali-kali." "tidak ada cara lain?" "ada. jangan pernah merasa memiliki."

    56519301115K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20261.9x their median

    Di hidup yang cuma sekali ini, mari rayakan dengan bersenang-senang. Bukankah angka yang terus bertambah setiap tahunnya adalah hal yang harus disyukuri? Tolong, jangan mengacaukannya! https://t.co/GNpeeMsiML

    5172051314K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20261.9x their median

    bukankah kehilangan memang selalu seperti ini—tiba-tiba?

    5481670714K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20261.7x their median

    "Mau menunggu sampai kapan?" "Aku sedang tidak menunggu." "Lalu?" "Aku sedang merapikan semua yang pernah kubuat berantakan. Aku ingin memastikan semuanya membaik sebelum beranjak." "Semuanya yang kamu maksud, termasuk dirimu, kan?" "Semoga saja, ya. Aku juga tidak yakin."

    4501910714K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 388 interactions against 82K followers, an engagement rate of 0.472%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 78% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 9.2K times each, and 4.19% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 13% carry an image or video and 6% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 66x its own typical post.

What is Sore, Langit!'s engagement rate on X?
Sore, Langit! (@senjaamu) has an engagement rate of 0.472%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 82,022 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.472%, Sore, Langit! sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @senjaamu have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 78% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @senjaamu post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going