Search Engine Land engagement report
@sengineland - 452K followers on X
Measured over 68 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 18 interactions against 452K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 68 original posts, its engagement rate beats 23% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.7K times each, and 0.488% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.815% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 68 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video and 76% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 193 interactions, about 11x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #seo, #ai, #geo.
Measured over 68 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026. Recurring tags: #seo, #ai, #geo.
Compared with accounts its own size
Search Engine Land's engagement rate beats 23% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 30% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.004%, Search Engine Land sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 88% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 76% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 88% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 76% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 233 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 2, 202511x their median
The SEO world can be noisy. Every new LLM feature, SERP shift, or Google comment sparks a frenzy. But here’s the truth: What works in #SEO hasn’t changed. The real operators stay calm, and focus on fundamentals. Let’s bust some myths in this thread 🧵👇
- Sep 5, 20264.3x their median
ChatGPT traffic jumped 48% in the U.S. while Bing fell 50%. The bigger #SEO problem: GA4 is getting worse at telling you where visits came from. Winners, losers and measurement gap here: https://t.co/KkoavTaBGH https://t.co/7lnsi2k2nM
- Sep 3, 20263.1x their median
If #GA4 says you got zero traffic on Sept. 1, don't panic. This appears to be a widespread reporting bug, not an actual traffic collapse. Google hasn't confirmed it yet. What we know so far: https://t.co/bqMAQJ1qaq https://t.co/03YhicI8EI
- Aug 29, 20262.5x their median
Link volume isn't the goal in 2027. Earned authority is. The winners will build journalist relationships, original stories and contextual mentions, not spammy outreach. Read all 13 wins and fails here: https://t.co/ShCedYciA4 https://t.co/4QHqP8rFN6
- Aug 22, 20262.5x their median
AI citations aren't won with one tactic. They compound across 3 phases: technical accessibility, fresh owned content and third-party authority. Here's how to build the system: https://t.co/IOesFa4Rmu https://t.co/FsoNWF0sLo
- Sep 14, 20262.4x their median
Content marketing hit a 12-year performance low. AI use reached 92.4%, but showed no relationship with stronger results. The bigger issue: proven tactics are being used less. Check the findings here: https://t.co/ItC5iJikFG https://t.co/asDakD9LLL
- Sep 7, 20262.4x their median
AI crawlers don't always see your site the way Googlebot does. If key content loads through JavaScript, it may be invisible. Here's how to make your site easier for #AI crawlers to access, understand, and cite: https://t.co/MDxeK6JFhl https://t.co/FvjRNF91Dr
- Aug 17, 20262.3x their median
When you inherit a site with years of #SEO decisions baked in, what's the very first thing you look at?
- Sep 7, 20262.3x their median
ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity don't cite sources the same way. Some lean on Wikipedia; others cite Reddit, reviews, listicles, social posts and niche publications. The new data shows what brands need to do to earn both #AI mentions and direct citations: https://t.co/ulfYZO7v6b https://t.co/WnDxZA6MkX
- Sep 16, 20262.2x their median
SEO strategy that stops at the first #query can miss the rest of the decision journey. Conversational search lets users clarify, compare, validate + act without rebuilding context. So you have to optimize for the next useful question, not just the first keyword. Here's how 🧵 https://t.co/pBoCNqoSdv
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 18 interactions against 452K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 68 original posts, its engagement rate beats 23% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.7K times each, and 0.488% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.815% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 68 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video and 76% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 193 interactions, about 11x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #seo, #ai, #geo.
- What is Search Engine Land's engagement rate on X?
- Search Engine Land (@sengineland) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 68 original posts from the last 30 days against 452,402 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.004%, Search Engine Land sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @sengineland have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 23% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @sengineland post?
- Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.33 posts per day across the measured window.