david D. engagement report
@secretsqrl123 - 160K followers on X
Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 253 interactions against 160K followers, an engagement rate of 0.16%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 62% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.4K times each, and 3.01% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.25% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video, 21% are part of a thread and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.6K interactions, about 26x its own typical post.
Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
david D.'s engagement rate beats 62% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 74% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.16%, david D. sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.677%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.677% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 89% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 5% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 89% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 5% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 269 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 22, 202626x their median
rybar now saying the 144th division is still falling back. the 3rd corps is still advancing and destroying an entire army group as they move. this is historic. https://t.co/2jOa8KR9oA
- Sep 22, 202614x their median
🔥🛢️BREAKING: The Kuibyshev Oil Refinery in Samara, around 920 km from the front, was attacked overnight. Several major fires have broken out across the refinery, with a large blaze and a thick column of smoke visible over the site. The Rosneft-owned refinery has a processing capacity of about 6.7–7 million tonnes of oil per year. The same refinery was also hit on June 10, when both of its primary crude-distillation units were forced offline.
- Sep 22, 20262.4x their median
why the doomers of the world are freaking out..... Why do so many Europeans talk about an imminent Russian invasion of the Baltics or the eastern flank? It's simple, and it comes down to two things. First, it's used as PR to motivate the population. If there's no threat, nobody enlists, nobody spends money on weapons, nobody digs fortifications or bunkers, and nobody prepares for the unthinkable. Governments need to mobilize their people, and fear does that more effectively than anything else. Second, it is a real threat, just not an imminent one. It's not a threat today or tomorrow. It may come three to five years down the road, but not now. A lot of the people pushing this narrative have no military background, no military history, have never taken a military class, and don't understand logistics. The fact is that in 2026, 2027, and going forward, anyone moving a large amount of equipment toward a national border around Russia will be seen. We will know in advance, and we will be prepared. Right now, Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania, together with their NATO partners, have far more troops on the ground than Russia could ever amass at that border in any reasonable timeframe. Each of the three Baltic republics has at least two divisions of its own, plus another NATO division stationed there, which comes to nine full divisions in the Baltics alone. Add roughly twelve divisions of Polish and partner forces in Poland, and probably six more in Romania. The fact is, even if the war in Ukraine ended today and Russia pulled everything back, it would still take years to get ready to fight again. And when that day came, Russia wouldn't be facing a Ukraine-type opponent with a marginal air force. It would be facing the largest combat-ready air force in the world: NATO's. For that fight, Russia is decades away from being able to respond.
- Sep 22, 20261.5x their median
my god he looks old, weak , and tired...... https://t.co/4A0vDX3Q3F
- Sep 22, 2026
another day of picking up donations for liberty ukraine.... my life is great. https://t.co/nUPb2guJQO
- Sep 22, 2026
WOW!!!!!! The situation in Staritsa is even worse than we described. These are the words of a soldier who managed to get out of there. "I personally explored the area, including crossing the river. The enemy is in the coniferous forest. We, with our fallen leaves, are like sitting ducks. If there were any entry points, they have long been targeted by mortars and rocket artillery. It's a tactical nightmare. And our 'experts' are sending groups of people there. They somehow pushed over 100 people into that area. Some were hit by mines, while others were under heavy fire and drone attacks. Only 2 people made it out. One was killed by our own forces on the bank. The second drowned. There are mines there, and it's no longer clear whose they are. Plus, there are both magnetic and conventional mines. In short, as long as these 'strategists' don't burn down the forest, they will continue to sacrifice personnel." Subscribe | Report information Search for soldiers | Our YouTube channel
- Sep 22, 2026
nearly no one clapped when trump finished. it sounded like a bunch of golf claps https://t.co/aV1gIhEiKS
- Sep 22, 2026
Comparison of grain exports in September by Ukraine and Russia rounded to the nearest 1000 tons. Russian data is for September 1st to 20th, Ukrainian is for September 1st to the 18th. https://t.co/GhIZb9uJPP
- Sep 22, 2026
this is a lie on sooooo many fronts. and its a dangerous lie. https://t.co/Up1rb7rh09
- Sep 22, 2026
i told everyone that he would turn the LG law into a wide tariff law. and he did https://t.co/vlqte2ZZs1
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 253 interactions against 160K followers, an engagement rate of 0.16%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 62% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.4K times each, and 3.01% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.25% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video, 21% are part of a thread and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.6K interactions, about 26x its own typical post.
- What is david D.'s engagement rate on X?
- david D. (@secretsqrl123) has an engagement rate of 0.16%, based on the median interactions across 19 original posts from the last 30 days against 160,283 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.16%, david D. sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @secretsqrl123 have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 62% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @secretsqrl123 post?
- Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.13 posts per day across the measured window.