Back to @seanfeucht's profile

Sean Feucht engagement report

@seanfeucht - 215K followers on X

Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.108%
of 215K followers
Per impression
4.22%
5.5K views on a typical post
Reach
2.57%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
233
interactions (median)
Saved
0.054%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.83/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 233 interactions against 215K followers, an engagement rate of 0.108%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 61% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.5K times each, and 4.22% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.57% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 64% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 115K interactions, about 190x its own typical post.

Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026. Recurring tag: #letusworship.

Compared with accounts its own size

Sean Feucht's engagement rate beats 61% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 83% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.108%, Sean Feucht sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,782 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,782 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video64% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link15% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 64% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 15% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 246 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 17, 2025190x their median

    When things are moving very fast and people are losing their minds, it’s important to stay grounded. Turn off your phone, read scripture, spend time with friends, and remember internet fury is not real life. It’s going to be ok.

    94K16K3.5K1.4K5.5M viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 2026113x their median

    Big revelation that the world should know about the hijacking attempt of the FlyDubai plane. The terrorist pilot, Mohammed Hamam Al-Hammami, was not planning merely to crash the Israel-bound FlyDubai flight and kill 180 people, the majority of whom were Jews. His plan was bigger. He wanted to crash the plane into a high-rise skyscraper in Tel Aviv or the Burj Khalifa in Dubai and kill as many non-Muslims as possible. According to intelligence sources, he was in contact with some radical elements in Iran, Pakistan, Syria, and Turkey. He was a big fan of Osama bin Laden, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, and Pakistan-based UN-designated terrorist Maulana Masood Azhar. He visited Pakistan in August and Turkey in May. He was also a supporter of New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani and London Mayor Sadiq Khan. He was fired by Oman Air in 2024–2025 for regularly browsing extremist websites and expressing support for the Islamic State, jihad, and anti-non-Muslim sentiments during conversations with colleagues.

    17K7.1K1.5K6171.2M viewsView on X
  • Jan 21, 202576x their median

    “So Sean, what do you think about doing worship at the Pentagon?” @PeteHegseth today at church. It just keeps getting better and better! 🔥🙏🏽🇺🇸 https://t.co/HrnwAWlD08

    15K2.1K671126917K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 202668x their median

    A picture that says 1,000 words. https://t.co/daWNbzOVRA

    15K1.1K22343208K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 202632x their median

    CHILLING: Khalid Sheikh Mohammed told his CIA interrogator that America would be beaten by immigration and its own liberties, not another airliner. ⠀ James Mitchell, the psychologist who questioned the 9/11 plotter after his 2003 capture, put that warning in his 2016 book and on Fox News. He was paraphrasing what KSM said in custody, not reading a public speech. ⠀ Mitchell said KSM called U.S. civil liberties, openness, and cultural guilt "gifts from Allah." In Mitchell's telling, those were weaknesses planted so the country could be defeated from inside. ⠀ The practical path, KSM said, was immigration. Jihadi-minded men would enter, live on welfare, wrap themselves in American rights, spread their message, and rise up when they were strong enough. ⠀ "You're going to protect us with your civil rights, and then, when the time is right, we are going to rise up and attack you," Mitchell recalled him saying. He also quoted KSM saying America would "expose her neck for sl*ughter." ⠀ Those lines come from an interrogator describing a captive, not from a courtroom verdict on every later plot. The 9/11 attacks themselves k*lled nearly 3,000 people. ⠀ A country that forgets what its enemies said out loud is volunteering for the next chapter. Honor the de*d by taking the warning as seriously as the planes. It's time to wake up, America. ⠀ #September11 #911

    5.2K2.1K85146156K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 202630x their median

    BREAKING: Persecution of Christians in Canada to be called out in Ottawa by U.S. lawmaker. From mass church burnings to imprisoned pastors, educators fired for their faith and concerns over MAID coercion, Oklahoma State Senator Shane Jett is coming to Ottawa to sound the alarm that our own leaders refuse to. Statement:

    4.9K1.8K25410874K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 202617x their median

    Secretary of War Pete Hegseth visited the Air Force Academy and hit 9 of 10 attempts from the three point line. https://t.co/gnuWFSMMYE

    3.3K25018071225K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 202615x their median

    What a beautiful moment singing Amazing Grace at the Kennedy Center honoring Charlie Kirk . 🙏 . . #letusworship https://t.co/YHeIjPv6PP

    2.9K523161414K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20268.2x their median

    It’s time to confront and call out the demonic ideology that led to the worst terrorist attack in American history. If you can’t do this, you dishonor every life lost that day. https://t.co/GJEGiDHG6V

    1.5K404311112K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20268.0x their median

    25 years after 9/11, we declare: NEW YORK CITY BELONGS TO JESUS. 🙏🏽🗽🇺🇸 https://t.co/F2i8iZhQuc

    1.5K2782399.1K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#letusworship

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 233 interactions against 215K followers, an engagement rate of 0.108%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 61% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.5K times each, and 4.22% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.57% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 64% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 115K interactions, about 190x its own typical post.

What is Sean Feucht's engagement rate on X?
Sean Feucht (@seanfeucht) has an engagement rate of 0.108%, based on the median interactions across 47 original posts from the last 30 days against 214,641 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.108%, Sean Feucht sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,782 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @seanfeucht have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 61% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @seanfeucht post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.83 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going