Steven Crowder engagement report
@scrowder - 2.5M followers on X
Measured over 46 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 5.4K interactions against 2.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.211%. Measured over 46 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 258K times each, and 2.09% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 46 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 96K interactions, about 18x its own typical post.
Measured over 46 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Steven Crowder's engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 77% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.211%, Steven Crowder sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.434%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.08% |
| 75th percentile | 0.434% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 160.7% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 50K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 51K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 50K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 53K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 43K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 42K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 48K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 52K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 60K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 69K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 72K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 78K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 86K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 94K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 97K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 97K |
| 17:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 84K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 79K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 74K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 66K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 57K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 51K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +4% | 230K |
| Monday | 0% | 286K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 276K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 251K |
| Thursday | -1% | 244K |
| Friday | -3% | 252K |
| Saturday | +3% | 227K |
Best tweets
- Jul 31, 202618x their median
My full speech at the @OxfordUnion debating whether the west is right to be suspicious of Islam. I needed a security team to attend and we were spat at, bullied and heckled by a baying mob. But I will not give up on free speech. I will not submit. https://t.co/fgC7Xr963d
- Aug 14, 20265.2x their median
Andrew Wilson: “Do you actually believe that anybody in TPUSA or Erika Kirk actually participated, had foreknowledge of, or facilitated the murder of Charlie Kirk? Candace Owens: “I'm not going to get myself into a legal pickle here.” There you have it! She either doesn't know or she's a coward.
- Jul 13, 20263.8x their median
Trans violence is real. Investigating this secretive trans death cult took me back to America. It put my life at risk again. Hormones. Human experimentation. Swords. Guns. Bodies. This is the true story of the Zizians. ON SALE OCT. 13. PRE-ORDER NOW. https://t.co/Co0qXWNerT https://t.co/8IBghWUrTn
- Jul 31, 20263.2x their median
What's the problem? It's just a bunch of women and children seeking a better life. https://t.co/T5eMbB3Av6
- Aug 19, 20262.8x their median
The Home Office knows illegal immigrants are so dangerous they have the tell them not to rape kids, beat up women or mutilate genitals. And yet they’re about to plonk a load of them in rural villages. https://t.co/umeZgnRAfe
- Aug 14, 20262.5x their median
“She didn't have a single solid piece of evidence. She had no positive evidence that Israel's involved in anything, no positive evidence that France is involved in anything, no positive evidence TPUSA is involved in anything, no positive evidence that Erika Kirk is involved in anything.” - Andrew Wilson’s “final thoughts” on his debate with Candace Owens
- Aug 23, 20262.3x their median
Female wedding guest launches into a full-blown meltdown after bringing up Lindsay Clancy, using murdered children to push an “advocate for women” narrative. And the woman filming? She clearly agrees. Just beforehand, she uploaded a video saying Lindsay’s husband “fucking did it.” Imagine turning a murdered child into a prop for your argument. These women are insane!
- Jul 31, 20262.2x their median
Tony Fauci is a friend and Congress is about lawfare not answers https://t.co/TQ1dzUGZFa
- Aug 10, 20261.9x their median
They hate us 'cause they aint' us. https://t.co/4mHbJJNLWQ
- Aug 20, 20261.8x their median
I do not have any sympathy for Lindsay Clancy and I do not have any sympathy for Karmelo Anthony. Sure, pray for them. My sympathy is to the actual victims, not those who use it as a get out of jail free card or some kind of social currency. https://t.co/Ac4qvdkshk
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 5.4K interactions against 2.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.211%. Measured over 46 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 258K times each, and 2.09% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 46 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 96K interactions, about 18x its own typical post.
- What is Steven Crowder's engagement rate on X?
- Steven Crowder (@scrowder) has an engagement rate of 0.211%, based on the median interactions across 46 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,545,675 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.211%, Steven Crowder sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @scrowder have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @scrowder post?
- Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.63 posts per day across the measured window.