Back to @screentime's profile

ScreenTime engagement report

@screentime - 837K followers on X

Measured over 107 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.177%
of 837K followers
Per impression
2.86%
52K views on a typical post
Reach
6.19%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.5K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.112%
58 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.43/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 1.5K interactions against 837K followers, an engagement rate of 0.177%. Measured over 107 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 52K times each, and 2.86% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.19% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 107 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 24% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17K interactions, about 11x its own typical post.

Measured over 107 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

ScreenTime's engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 79% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.177%, ScreenTime sits above the 50th percentile of the 157,515 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.128% to 0.604%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,515 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,033 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 168 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 14, 202611x their median

    Scientists name new lizard species after House of the Dragon's Syrax Acanthosaura syrax was found in Thailand's mountain forests https://t.co/8C1x5GJcy8

    16K89347108553K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20269.4x their median

    Chris Hansen showed up to watch Robert Pattinson's portrayal of him in Primetime However, he left before seeing it because he refused to sign away his name, image and brand rights https://t.co/Jggdl8ZrAr

    14K12149201.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20269.0x their median

    The creator of One Piece, Echiro Oda, says there's at least another four years of stories left https://t.co/HMTPAZ1F3m

    12K589223665753K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20268.4x their median

    Batman was mentioned in Lanterns Episode 6 "Ripped off that Bat guy over in Gotham, too. Put a beacon right in the middle of the f**king town here so people can summon him" https://t.co/q3XVGAm8RY

    12K3412330405K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20267.2x their median

    Sebastian Stan says he has no idea what Avengers: Doomsday is about The cast never saw a full script and scenes were shot out of order to prevent leaks https://t.co/1NfuoWRKZ9

    10K2523331167K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20267.1x their median

    Spider-Noir won five Emmys just days after being canceled by Prime Video The Nicolas Cage-led series was nominated for 11 Emmys overall https://t.co/axKde3WxTe

    10K3463114145K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20266.9x their median

    Adria Arjona is reportedly James Gunn’s choice to play Wonder Woman in the DCU Gunn may have already secretly cast the actress, according to rumors https://t.co/RGKpzECIie

    9.9K2438140354K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20266.9x their median

    A new Silent Hill film is reportedly in the works from the producer of Zach Cregger’s Resident Evil He has around 20 video game adaptations in development, including the “Japanese horror classic,” reported The Wall Street Journal https://t.co/UyXhdVMgaY

    9.5K52980192290K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20266.6x their median

    Garrett Wareing says he wants to play Iceman in the MCU The Long Walk star says he is “so badly” hoping to take on the X-Men role https://t.co/SQMzsjAa3k

    9.5K1782540350K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20266.5x their median

    The Odyssey has dethroned Spider-Man: Brand New Day at the domestic box office It passed $1.8M, while Spider-Man has earned $1.7M https://t.co/2E1saQ6sQ6

    9.4K1965930324K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.5K interactions against 837K followers, an engagement rate of 0.177%. Measured over 107 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 52K times each, and 2.86% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.19% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 107 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 24% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17K interactions, about 11x its own typical post.

What is ScreenTime's engagement rate on X?
ScreenTime (@screentime) has an engagement rate of 0.177%, based on the median interactions across 107 original posts from the last 30 days against 837,448 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.177%, ScreenTime sits above the 50th percentile of the 157,515 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @screentime have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @screentime post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.43 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going