Back to @science's profile

Science, Space & Robots engagement report

@science - 752K followers on X

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0%
of 752K followers
Per impression
0%
2.1K views on a typical post
Reach
0.28%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
0
interactions (median)
Saved
0.048%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.07/day
active 7% of days
Peak time
23:00 UTC
Monday

Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 752K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Posts are seen about 2.1K times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.278% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.07 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 47 interactions. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0%, Science, Space & Robots sits below the 10th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,521 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,166 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Sep 26, 2025

    NASA’s confirmed exoplanet total has reached 6,000. An additional 8,000 candidates are waiting in the pipeline to be confirmed. https://t.co/91IMwRcp3O https://t.co/7zv3pR5j6E

    3012507.0K viewsView on X
  • Jun 22, 2026

    New store in Hong Kong is run by a humanoid robot named Xiao Gai https://t.co/4n5DBWPYvA

    1615715.0K viewsView on X
  • Nov 28, 2025

    Robot Patrols: China to deploy humanoid robots for patrols along Vietnam border https://t.co/gJtBgQzwRC

    1711022.7K viewsView on X
  • Apr 25, 2026

    Japanese researchers think the asteroid Ryugu was once bombarded by micrometeorites. They say the evidence is a thin layer of sodium on the surface of the asteroid's fragments. https://t.co/rK8BrduVX3

    224306.3K viewsView on X
  • Jan 22, 2026

    World's oldest cave art discovered in Indonesia. It dates back to at least 67,000 years ago. https://t.co/yWuwSS867L

    136333.9K viewsView on X
  • Dec 9, 2025

    Chinese robotics company EngineAI released a video about its T800 robot kicking the CEO https://t.co/1SGgT2en5r

    168104.1K viewsView on X
  • May 13, 2026

    Scientists challenge hypothesis that climate change results in massive agricultural pest populations https://t.co/iQNrB9ozjU

    153203.7K viewsView on X
  • May 6, 2026

    The 2025 Tracy Arm tsunami in Alaska reached over 1,500 feet high and moved over 70 mph. Tsunami modeler and researcher Patrick Lynett created an animation of the event. https://t.co/OTfurG947M

    141403.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 2025

    Scientists create human eggs from skin cells. Prof Shoukhrat Mitalipov says, "The largest group of patients who might benefit would be women of advanced maternal age." https://t.co/PGoXrcbOjP

    94327.5K viewsView on X
  • Jan 27, 2026

    Fauna Robotics has unveiled its new soft robot named Sprout. The 3.5 foot tall bipedal robot features a rectangular head. It will cost $50,000 according to the AP https://t.co/eWVDvYUTuc

    76203.5K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 752K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Posts are seen about 2.1K times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.278% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.07 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 47 interactions. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Science, Space & Robots's engagement rate on X?
Science, Space & Robots (@science) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 751,793 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0%, Science, Space & Robots sits below the 10th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @science have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @science post?
Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going