Back to @saxena_puru's profile

Puru Saxena engagement report

@saxena_puru - 404K followers on X

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.088%
of 404K followers
Per impression
0.799%
45K views on a typical post
Reach
11.1%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
356
interactions (median)
Saved
0.099%
44 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.77/day
active 80% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 356 interactions against 404K followers, an engagement rate of 0.088%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 69% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 45K times each, and 0.799% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 24% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 30% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 928 interactions, about 2.6x its own typical post.

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Puru Saxena's engagement rate beats 69% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 42% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.088%, Puru Saxena sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video24% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link30% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 24% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 30% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 457 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 13, 20262.6x their median

    When you're the top dog and worried about open source eating your lunch, the easiest way to kill competition is by introducing heavy regulation.

    8146838863K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20262.3x their median

    AI stocks declined 50-60% in June-July, bottomed this month and are now consolidating. The fundamentals are still intact, the sell-off was driven by technicals and after a near-term chop, we expect a strong multi-month rally in the leading stocks.

    7264534569K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20262.2x their median

    Seasonality turns positive now Q4-Q2 most favourable phase of the US Presidential Cycle We’re positioned for the rally. $NDX $SPX https://t.co/B3B86n81Fy

    6647941775K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20262.2x their median

    "Buy & Hold" works at an index-level over the long-term. It does NOT work for the vast majority of individual stocks. If you invest in stocks, a strategy of booking profits and cutting losses is a must. Stage Analysis allows us to ride the uptrends and avoid nasty declines.

    6963748983K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20262.0x their median

    Fed hikes by 25bps and signals one more hike this year Uncertainty is now out of the way and we're about to enter the seasonally strong time of the year and the most bullish phase of the US Presidential Cycle. Our portfolio is positioned for the opportunity.

    6473237577K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20262.0x their median

    Neoclouds are scaling faster than the hyperscalers https://t.co/bXVpkf4fxB

    58864461086K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20261.9x their median

    Big rally in the leading AI stocks today. 2027 is the 3rd Year of the US Presidential Cycle and based on history, the best 7-month window is from 1 October '26 - 30 April '27. Expecting a multi-month advance in AI stocks, our portfolio is positioned for the opportunity.

    6104828471K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20261.9x their median

    AI stocks are like coiled springs, after near-term consolidation expecting a multi-month rally. Every AI metric is accelerating and this is positive. The recent rout was a technical unwind, not the end of the story IMO.

    5963630665K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20261.9x their median

    $KOSPI - time to buy Pullback to the 40-week moving average + bullish cross A rally will be *very* positive for the AI trade, we're fully invested and ready for the opportunity https://t.co/DTN7WxdgOf

    57059201182K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20261.7x their median

    "Buy & Hold" stocks for the long-term...think again! $LULU ~80% below its all-time high $TTD ~90% below its all-time high $PYPL ~80% below its all-time high Most growth stocks run for years, then collapse as competition ramps up. Stocks have to be bought and sold.

    5202970377K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 356 interactions against 404K followers, an engagement rate of 0.088%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 69% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 45K times each, and 0.799% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 24% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 30% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 928 interactions, about 2.6x its own typical post.

What is Puru Saxena's engagement rate on X?
Puru Saxena (@saxena_puru) has an engagement rate of 0.088%, based on the median interactions across 33 original posts from the last 30 days against 403,612 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.088%, Puru Saxena sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @saxena_puru have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 69% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @saxena_puru post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.77 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going