Back to @savageclipss's profile

out of context clips that go hard πŸ’€ engagement report

@savageclipss - 861K followers on X

Measured over 50 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.039%
of 861K followers
Per impression
0.983%
34K views on a typical post
Reach
3.95%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
334
interactions (median)
Saved
0.1%
34 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.13/day
active 87% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 334 interactions against 861K followers, an engagement rate of 0.039%. Measured over 50 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 3,809 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 34K times each, and 0.983% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.95% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 50 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 37K interactions, about 111x its own typical post.

Measured over 50 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

out of context clips that go hard πŸ’€'s engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,809 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 50% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.039%, out of context clips that go hard πŸ’€ sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,852 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99159.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,852 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,564 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-3%95K
14:00 UTC-4%98K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-4%99K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%232K
Monday0%290K
Tuesday-2%281K
Wednesday-1%252K
Thursday-2%245K
Friday-3%254K
Saturday+3%228K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 12, 2026111x their median

    I tried to stop her, but she was determined to save that fawnβ€”and then this happened. πŸ₯Ί https://t.co/YxIjaXEpAx

    35K1.7K131261.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 202676x their median

    I love how you can see the level of excitement just by how wide open the baby’s eyes are. https://t.co/0qIMgDdFzg

    24K1.2K73221.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202669x their median

    The cameraman talent is unreal πŸ₯° https://t.co/l60N8A2JUL

    22K1.0K206552.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 202662x their median

    POV: The camera points at you in front of 20,000 people and you handle the spotlight better than most A-list celebrities. https://t.co/Vq5oOCtA1H

    20K6154010452K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202649x their median

    My younger brother says: "If it weren't for me, this family would fall apart." πŸ˜‚ https://t.co/wm4xQGmb85

    15K1.0K6960962K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 202648x their median

    Proof that female behavior is completely universal across all species. πŸ˜‚ https://t.co/YXIliX2PIe

    15K931112321.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202634x their median

    Not a single bill to pay, zero responsibilities. 🀣 https://t.co/1iEsmfKmZ9

    10K8587367378K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 202633x their median

    I thought the baby came for food, not salutesπŸ˜‚ https://t.co/lIndD5EzKR

    10K6398921286K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202631x their median

    She was determined to jump in that puddle, and Dad was equally determined to stop her. πŸ˜‚β€οΈ https://t.co/1DReLSGvlF

    9.5K6305534598K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20268.5x their median

    Children bring happiness to the home 🏠πŸ₯° https://t.co/dqagGBtdjq

    2.5K262331072K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 334 interactions against 861K followers, an engagement rate of 0.039%. Measured over 50 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 3,809 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 34K times each, and 0.983% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.95% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 50 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 37K interactions, about 111x its own typical post.

What is out of context clips that go hard πŸ’€'s engagement rate on X?
out of context clips that go hard πŸ’€ (@savageclipss) has an engagement rate of 0.039%, based on the median interactions across 50 original posts from the last 30 days against 861,019 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.039%, out of context clips that go hard πŸ’€ sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,852 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @savageclipss have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,809 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @savageclipss post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going