out of context clips that go hard π engagement report
@savageclipss - 869K followers on X
Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 454 interactions against 869K followers, an engagement rate of 0.052%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 60% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 34K times each, and 1.32% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.97% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 78K interactions, about 172x its own typical post.
Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
out of context clips that go hard π's engagement rate beats 60% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 55% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.052%, out of context clips that go hard π sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -8% | -9% to -7% | 41K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 71 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 21, 2026172x their median
That's all fat. She has the real muscles. https://t.co/uGogiDrOSu
- Aug 12, 202682x their median
I tried to stop her, but she was determined to save that fawnβand then this happened. π₯Ί https://t.co/YxIjaXEpAx
- Aug 16, 202656x their median
I love how you can see the level of excitement just by how wide open the babyβs eyes are. https://t.co/0qIMgDdFzg
- Aug 22, 202651x their median
The cameraman talent is unreal π₯° https://t.co/l60N8A2JUL
- Aug 4, 202646x their median
POV: The camera points at you in front of 20,000 people and you handle the spotlight better than most A-list celebrities. https://t.co/Vq5oOCtA1H
- Sep 13, 202641x their median
When you try to impress everyone, but gravity has other plans. https://t.co/YkGhBCFWXj
- Aug 28, 202637x their median
My younger brother says: "If it weren't for me, this family would fall apart." π https://t.co/wm4xQGmb85
- Aug 2, 202635x their median
Proof that female behavior is completely universal across all species. π https://t.co/YXIliX2PIe
- Aug 21, 202625x their median
Not a single bill to pay, zero responsibilities. π€£ https://t.co/1iEsmfKmZ9
- Aug 17, 202624x their median
I thought the baby came for food, not salutesπ https://t.co/lIndD5EzKR
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 454 interactions against 869K followers, an engagement rate of 0.052%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 60% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 34K times each, and 1.32% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.97% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 78K interactions, about 172x its own typical post.
- What is out of context clips that go hard π's engagement rate on X?
- out of context clips that go hard π (@savageclipss) has an engagement rate of 0.052%, based on the median interactions across 47 original posts from the last 30 days against 868,830 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.052%, out of context clips that go hard π sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @savageclipss have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 60% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @savageclipss post?
- Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.37 posts per day across the measured window.