Back to @sarahlugor's profile

sarah lugor! engagement report

@sarahlugor - 456K followers on X

Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.407%
of 456K followers
Per impression
8.98%
21K views on a typical post
Reach
4.53%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.9K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.138%
28 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.63/day
active 73% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 1.9K interactions against 456K followers, an engagement rate of 0.407%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 8.98% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.54% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 13% carry an image or video and 33% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 41K interactions, about 56x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #analog, #light, #love.

Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026. Recurring tags: #analog, #light, #love.

Compared with accounts its own size

sarah lugor!'s engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 97% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.407%, sarah lugor! sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video13% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 13% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 135 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Nov 20, 202556x their median

    Eating healthy is learning to not eat for taste.

    33K5.1K8612.4K3.0M viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202614x their median

    Nobody likes you when you're depressed. Plain and simple. We can talk all day about mental health and how important it is, but the moment you are depressed, people start to distance themselves. They see you as negative, a burden, and someone too heavy to handle.

    20K5.8K211587822K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 202612x their median

    Kept finding my attic door open and having to re close it for the past two weeks https://t.co/qedcS1bmva

    22K1.0K3734935K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 202611x their median

    Being disliked by people with ugly spirits is protection. I have no desire to be connected to people who operate from jealousy, wickedness, negativity, entitlement, manipulation or a lack of integrity. Life is spiritual. Not every heart is safe to stay connected to..

    15K4.4K46149273K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20265.7x their median

    stop letting people tell you it’s over, earth is very resilient and adaptive. every time we think it’s the end she shows us something else. miracles happen every day if you believe they can— let’s have some faith

    9.0K1.3K46102114K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20264.8x their median

    gonna start cold calling my friends like my mom our generation is so “don’t talk to me” this “therapy speak” that there’s no way you really believe that your best healing happens in clinical isolation

    8.5K376113979K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20264.0x their median

    put a pin in it ꕤ 🎥: Kayli Sandoval https://t.co/8sI7hpX3uk

    7.1K3238102419K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20263.8x their median

    i’m sorry but i’m an advocate for girls who have been socialized by boys— all it takes is just one good girl group and you’ll be changed spiritually

    7.0K16361263K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20263.7x their median

    i litrally should’ve known something was up when my very clean apartment suddenly got infested with maggots and flies, then my cat died, then i moved into a house where strange and unusual things started happening — LA it’s undeniable spiritual warfare happening here like WOAH

    6.9K61148103K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20263.4x their median

    I just noticed Blue Dress pushes up her glasses in this scene https://t.co/LEIER5uW3k

    6.0K186541032.0M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#analog#light#love#neverforget

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.9K interactions against 456K followers, an engagement rate of 0.407%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 8.98% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.54% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 13% carry an image or video and 33% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 41K interactions, about 56x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #analog, #light, #love.

What is sarah lugor!'s engagement rate on X?
sarah lugor! (@sarahlugor) has an engagement rate of 0.407%, based on the median interactions across 30 original posts from the last 30 days against 455,768 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.407%, sarah lugor! sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @sarahlugor have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @sarahlugor post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going