Back to @sarahlouiseit's profile

☆SARAH LOUISE☆ engagement report

@sarahlouiseit - 362K followers on X

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.003%
of 362K followers
Per impression
0.236%
4.7K views on a typical post
Reach
1.29%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
11
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.5/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 11 interactions against 362K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 15% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 4.7K times each, and 0.236% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.29% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.5 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 69% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 177 interactions, about 16x its own typical post.

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026. Recurring tag: #milfmonday.

Compared with accounts its own size

☆SARAH LOUISE☆'s engagement rate beats 15% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 17% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.003%, ☆SARAH LOUISE☆ sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.016%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,128 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,111 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link69% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 69% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 40 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 13, 202616x their median

    Tomo night myself and @SiobhanMillerxx will be doing 3 way teams calls only a few slots left DM to book https://t.co/y0EGw0VPGe

    1551110118K viewsView on X
  • Jul 3, 20262.1x their median

    Party time tomorrow @SiobhanMillerxx @sarahlouiseit 🎉

    1624135K viewsView on X
  • Jul 16, 20261.7x their median

    Play date tonight with my bestie @charliec_xxx

    171108.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 2026

    Take 2 🎬 https://t.co/GUEt3xcuKz

    120205.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 2026

    Online tonight doing shows and filming customs ❤️ https://t.co/GUEt3xcuKz

    100304.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 2026

    Peek a boo https://t.co/GUEt3xcuKz

    100304.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 2026

    The one that always escapes 🤣🤣🤣 https://t.co/GUEt3xcuKz

    101204.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 2026

    Don’t be boring ……. https://t.co/GUEt3xcuKz

    100204.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 2026

    Weekend fun https://t.co/GUEt3xcuKz

    101104.9K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 2026

    Getting that 🍑🍑🍑🍑🍑 https://t.co/GUEt3xcuKz

    91204.6K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#milfmonday

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 11 interactions against 362K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 15% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 4.7K times each, and 0.236% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.29% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.5 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 69% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 177 interactions, about 16x its own typical post.

What is ☆SARAH LOUISE☆'s engagement rate on X?
☆SARAH LOUISE☆ (@sarahlouiseit) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 361,888 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.003%, ☆SARAH LOUISE☆ sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @sarahlouiseit have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 15% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @sarahlouiseit post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going