Back to @sambillings's profile

Sam Billings engagement report

@sambillings - 410K followers on X

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.064%
of 410K followers
Per impression
1.59%
16K views on a typical post
Reach
4.00%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
261
interactions (median)
Saved
0.006%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 261 interactions against 410K followers, an engagement rate of 0.064%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 63% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 1.59% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.01% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video and 22% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 72K interactions, about 453x its own typical post.

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026. Recurring tag: #nrl.

Compared with accounts its own size

Sam Billings's engagement rate beats 63% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 60% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.064%, Sam Billings sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,152 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video33% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link22% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 33% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 22% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 115 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 12, 2026453x their median

    Henry and Zlatan juggling the ball with skills… they’ve still got it 😂 https://t.co/EEwvMROtcf

    65K5.3K70883818M viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 202634x their median

    "The decisions Thomas Tuchel made, we have to be honest on this, have cost us tonight." 😬 Wayne Rooney believes England's switch to a back five is what proved costly. https://t.co/QZh1NU8JVS

    7.5K682493113614K viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 202620x their median

    Thank god for that! 🇪🇸👏🏼

    5.0K25323852K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20269.2x their median

    Anyone who says anything negative about Bruno Fernandes you can ignore anything they ever say about the game of football… You’re welcome

    2.1K25633941K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20266.6x their median

    Pep knew this was happening… Sir Alex did it without any of this circus 🐐

    1.6K10226730K viewsView on X
  • Jun 16, 20266.2x their median

    Joe Root is asked on whether there is a drinking culture amongst the England squad and whether or not there should be an alcohol ban 💬 https://t.co/x5Lk81DbSn

    1.5K545831578K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20263.8x their median

    On a happier note… I have loved the opportunity working with the young lions @englandcricket u19s this week! Huge amount of talent coming through and I’m looking forward to following their journeys in the game. https://t.co/Z29Ji61j8o

    9701410247K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20262.9x their median

    Ollie Robinsons skill level as a bowler is so good. Jamie Smiths glove work has been exceptional this morning too! Such different challenges to keep to at either end; 90mph pace reverse hands and then standing up with it zipping around 👏🏼

    743107146K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20262.6x their median

    A great month! Pleasure to lead the Rockets 🚀 Disappointing to fall at the final hurdle but congrats to MSG, deserving winners. 💯 https://t.co/9POvP7K0tn

    6351818217K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20261.7x their median

    Genuinely remarkable how Enzo Fernandez has been deemed inactive in the goal…

    4131320015K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#nrl

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 261 interactions against 410K followers, an engagement rate of 0.064%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 63% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 1.59% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.01% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video and 22% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 72K interactions, about 453x its own typical post.

What is Sam Billings's engagement rate on X?
Sam Billings (@sambillings) has an engagement rate of 0.064%, based on the median interactions across 18 original posts from the last 30 days against 410,316 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.064%, Sam Billings sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @sambillings have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 63% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @sambillings post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going