Back to @s0meone_u_know's profile

Viktor 🧡 engagement report

@s0meone_u_know - 382K followers on X

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.04%
of 382K followers
Per impression
1.27%
12K views on a typical post
Reach
3.11%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
153
interactions (median)
Saved
0.008%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.63/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 153 interactions against 382K followers, an engagement rate of 0.04%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 1.27% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.14% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 58% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 164K interactions, about 1071x its own typical post.

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Viktor 🧡's engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 54% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.04%, Viktor 🧡 sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video58% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link3% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 58% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 187 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 7, 20181071x their median

    What was Nike thinking?

    98K16K37K14KView on X
  • Jan 6, 20269.7x their median

    Telegram Gifts — the biggest invention in NFT history, with Millions of ppl already tapped in! - 102 bots & TMA’s - $279M+ in volume - 1B+ Telegram MAU - 138 Gift Collections - MC: 70M TON (~$140M) - 2,4M holders & 557k traders 1-year recap 🧵✍️ https://t.co/o1sz64C7Mv

    1.2K8619149189K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20268.4x their median

    GM 🇦🇪 https://t.co/ynluYa1QDj

    71344518330K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20265.6x their median

    I grew this account by replying to strangers, not by posting more Most of you are stuck in the same twenty accounts You farm each other and call it growth There are no new people inside that circle The audiences you actually want sit in small niche communities you have no exposure to Nobody in your circle has ever been in one The algo will put you in front of them if you go down that rabbit hole I grew fastest following where the timeline took me Following people whose interests matched mine Replying and interacting with those who valued it Then I stopped and went all in on content Worst mistake I have made on this platform Good posts do not build an audience, they reward one you already have You are trying to be worth following before anyone even knows you exist

    52257272830K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20262.6x their median

    Happy birthday @Telegram 🥳 https://t.co/3xXLIZ60aQ

    3163247214K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20262.6x their median

    Gm 🧡 https://t.co/kogzZauA5e

    2748109012K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20262.3x their median

    Gm 🧡 Don’t forget to enjoy the journey! https://t.co/JkuJ4Z0vCv

    2507100116K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20262.1x their median

    Gm 🧡 https://t.co/fS00DJs9Bo

    238681013K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20262.1x their median

    Gm 🧡 https://t.co/zriQgjLITk

    2151094112K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20262.0x their median

    BREAKING: Tonkeeper just went multi-chain & now supports GRAM, BTC, TRON & more networks. https://t.co/g8Sbq82Nc8

    2601728316K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 153 interactions against 382K followers, an engagement rate of 0.04%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 1.27% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.14% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 58% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 164K interactions, about 1071x its own typical post.

What is Viktor 🧡's engagement rate on X?
Viktor 🧡 (@s0meone_u_know) has an engagement rate of 0.04%, based on the median interactions across 33 original posts from the last 30 days against 382,303 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.04%, Viktor 🧡 sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @s0meone_u_know have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @s0meone_u_know post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going