Ryu Hasan engagement report
@ryuhasan - 108K followers on X
Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 61 interactions against 108K followers, an engagement rate of 0.057%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 41% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.3K times each, and 1.16% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.88% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 70% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.6K interactions, about 140x its own typical post.
Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Ryu Hasan's engagement rate beats 41% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 45% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.057%, Ryu Hasan sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 70% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 70% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 155 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Dec 14, 2015140x their median
kematian adalah resiko terbesar bagi organisma hidup, karena tidak akan pernah ada resiko lagi setelah organisma itu mati
- Oct 9, 202637x their median
Mathematics is the language in which God has written the universe. - Galileo Galilei https://t.co/S4va10jSHi
- Oct 9, 202623x their median
WHAT IF GOD IS NOT SOMEWHERE OUTSIDE THE UNIVERSE… BUT IS THE UNIVERSE ITSELF? Have you ever looked up at the night sky and wondered what the universe really is? Not just how the stars shine or how galaxies form, but what lies behind the existence of everything. For centuries, people have asked a question that still has no universally accepted answer: What if God and the universe are not two separate things? Believe it or not, a philosopher named Baruch Spinoza explored this very idea back in the 17th century. He believed that God and Nature were two ways of describing the same underlying reality. In his view, God was not a separate being sitting somewhere beyond the universe. Instead, everything that exists is part of one vast reality. This way of thinking became associated with a philosophy known as pantheism. What’s interesting is that modern science has revealed just how closely we are connected to the universe around us. The atoms in your body have a history stretching back billions of years. Many of the elements that make life possible were formed inside stars long before Earth existed. When some of those stars reached the end of their lives, they scattered these elements into space, helping create the building blocks of planets and living things. And the mysteries don’t end there. Quantum physics describes the universe in terms of underlying fields, with particles behaving as excitations of those fields. What looks like a world made of countless separate objects is far more complicated beneath the surface than our eyes can reveal. It raises fascinating questions about the true nature of reality, even though it does not prove that everything is connected in a spiritual sense. Then there is consciousness. How does a collection of physical matter inside the human brain give rise to thoughts, feelings, memories and the experience of being alive? Scientists continue to investigate consciousness, but many questions remain unanswered. Some philosophers have even proposed that consciousness, or a basic form of experience, might be a fundamental feature of reality. This idea is known as panpsychism, and it remains controversial. Of course, none of this proves that God is the universe. Science has not established that stars, atoms or quantum fields are divine. Spinoza’s philosophy is one way of interpreting existence, but others understand God in very different ways. The distinction matters because a scientific discovery and a belief about the ultimate meaning of life are not the same thing. Still, there is something remarkable about our place in the cosmos. We are made from the same elements found throughout the universe, and the same natural laws govern our bodies and distant galaxies. We are not visitors standing outside this vast cosmic story. We are part of it. And that brings us back to the question that has fascinated thinkers for centuries: Is the universe simply everything that exists, or is there a deeper meaning behind its existence? Perhaps the most honest answer is that we don’t know. Science can help us understand how the universe works, but whether the universe itself is God is a question that reaches beyond physics and into philosophy, faith and personal belief. What do you think? Is God separate from the universe, or could everything that exists be part of one greater reality?
- Oct 3, 20266.9x their median
If aliens exist, why haven't they contacted us yet? https://t.co/lpiP6uOEt4
- Oct 2, 20264.1x their median
🚨: Scientists find a place where time moves backward. https://t.co/tJtdV4TySw
- Oct 4, 20263.5x their median
Thanos was right
- Sep 19, 20262.4x their median
Ketemu teman yang dikabarkan sakit… ternyata kondisinya sehat wal maksiyat…
- Sep 13, 20262.3x their median
Marik kita rayakan kehidupan https://t.co/EHTlVQ68em
- Oct 9, 20262.2x their median
🚨: The closest known black hole to Earth is just 1,560 light-years away. https://t.co/FcKtmzwiep
- Sep 29, 20261.6x their median
Sudah makan siang dok? | memangnya siang bisa dimakan? yang enggak2 aja
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 61 interactions against 108K followers, an engagement rate of 0.057%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 41% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.3K times each, and 1.16% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.88% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 70% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.6K interactions, about 140x its own typical post.
- What is Ryu Hasan's engagement rate on X?
- Ryu Hasan (@ryuhasan) has an engagement rate of 0.057%, based on the median interactions across 33 original posts from the last 30 days against 107,871 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.057%, Ryu Hasan sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @ryuhasan have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 41% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @ryuhasan post?
- Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.47 posts per day across the measured window.