Back to @ruihanmeimei01's profile

锐汉街评 engagement report

@ruihanmeimei01 - 166K followers on X

Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.014%
of 166K followers
Per impression
0.564%
4.1K views on a typical post
Reach
2.46%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
23
interactions (median)
Saved
0.025%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 23 interactions against 166K followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 23% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 4.1K times each, and 0.564% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.45% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 35% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.7K interactions, about 249x its own typical post.

Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

锐汉街评's engagement rate beats 23% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 27% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.014%, 锐汉街评 sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,676 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video35% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 35% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 239 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 16, 2026249x their median

    日本网民做了条恶搞广告:要是印度人才大批涌入,日本电视上会变成什么样? 画面辣眼睛,评论区更热闹。 背景是高市早苗一边把永居申请费从1万日元涨到20万,一边给印度AI、半导体、医护人才开绿灯,连日语要求都免了。 日本人急了——不是反对引进人才,是不接受引进的方式。 语言不通、习惯不同,硬塞进来,社会能不能消化? 日本缺人是不争的事实,少子化摆在那,蓝领没人干。 可放开门槛不等于解决问题,消化不良比没人干活更麻烦。 这条恶搞广告虽然夸张,但折射的焦虑是真的。

    4.7K71524687474K viewsView on X
  • Oct 22, 2026131x their median

    大陸的朋友你們好 我是台灣的友人 我相信過不了多久 我們就不會再有分歧和矛盾 大陸的優良政策和制度 我們也很快就能享受到了 聽說大陸每到星期四 就會有一次十分優惠的活動 是叫什麼瘋狂星期四 馬上要到星期四了 不知道他們收不收台幣 所以我親愛的朋友能不能提前v我50 讓我體驗一下這個活動?

    2.2K297276297K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 202660x their median

    9月12日,HYROX北京站,澳大利亚选手Joanna比赛途中失禁! 污物沾身还继续跑,污染了赛道和公用器械,有选手踩到打滑。 裁判没叫停,只提醒绕行,她最终夺冠。 事后她说:赢就是赢。 14日官方发文力挺选手,说愤怒不该指向运动员。 可网友翻出对比:中国选手喝水溅到脸,被罚时两分钟。 一边是影响公共卫生的失禁照跑不误,一边是喝水溅脸罚得飞快——尺子有两把,标准看人下菜。 运动员不易,但公共卫生的底线谁来守? 你怎么看?

    95710429923437K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 202615x their median

    9月18日,英国AI女演员提丽·诺伍德上访谈节目宣传新片,被问到片中演员是真人还是数字人时,她答到一半突然卡壳,停了两秒,开口换成一口流利粤语,主持人和嘉宾当场愣住。 视频传开,网友第一反应是“被入侵了?” 制作公司回应:不是故障。 可这句回应才最值得琢磨——AI当众出了状况,算不算故障,解释权只在公司手里。 这位不睡觉、不拿片酬、被演员工会抵制的AI演员,抢的是真人的活,出了错却连“这算不算错”都轮不到观众问。 机器卡壳不稀奇,稀奇的是卡壳之后,只有一家公司有发言权。

    28820242235K viewsView on X
  • Oct 21, 202612x their median

    当街抓小三, 互撕互扯! 文明呢?形象呢? 掉落满街道! https://t.co/lr3i0XcGWc

    2212029243K viewsView on X
  • Oct 22, 20267.0x their median

    1945年重庆谈判,一个老问题常被翻出来:蒋介石手段那么狠,当年张学良陪他回南京,说软禁就软禁了几十年,为什么不敢把毛泽东扣在山城? 翻他的日记会发现,他真琢磨过,还一条条列过所谓罪状。但掂量到最后,没敢动手。 卡住他的有三道枷锁。 第一是民心,抗战刚结束,全国盼和平,三封电报邀人赴渝全世界都看着,回头扣人等于当众承认谈判是骗局。 第二是实力,解放区连成一片,百万武装在手,谈判期间上党战役照样开打,抓一个人摆不平北方。 第三是美苏,赫尔利以美国信誉担保人身安全,苏联盯着东北,扣人等于同时得罪两家。 毛主席敢深入虎穴,不是赌对方讲良心,是看透了投鼠忌器。 四十多天里他会晤各界广结人望,越是这样,那边越不敢动手。 谈判桌上的底气,从来不是嘴皮子给的。

    121930291K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20266.2x their median

    太讽刺了! 看到一个旧闻:挪威女子沙滩手球队拒绝穿比基尼,换上平角短裤上场,结果被官方罚款1500欧元,理由是“穿着不当”。 规则强制暴露,镜头猎奇收割,最后扛下非议的还是女运动员自己。 好在故事有后续:舆论炸了,国际手联悄悄改了规则,允许穿短裤比赛。 可细想还是不对劲——凭什么运动服该不该遮体,要靠罚款和骂战才改得动? 她们要的不是被凝视,是着装的选择权,和对拼搏本身的尊重。 规则改了,可当初开罚单的逻辑,未必真改了。

    23711307.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20264.5x their median

    霍英东2006年在北京逝世,灵柩盖五星红旗,国葬规格下葬,港澳降半旗。 安子介、庄世平也是同等待遇。这些人为什么配得上国葬? 因为他们是在国家最需要的时候出钱出力、押上全部身家的人。 霍英东抗美援朝时冒着封锁往内地运物资,庄世平创办南洋商业银行升起第一面五星红旗。 你想想那个年代,多少人避之不及,他们迎着上。 爱国不是嘴上喊喊,是真金白银和身家性命押上去的。 董建华治丧委员会名单一出来,大家又在讨论什么规格。 说实话,规格高低是后事,真正该被记住的是他们活着时为国家做了什么。 国旗盖棺不是谁都能有的,得问问自己这辈子配不配。你怎么看?

    691024011K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20263.7x their median

    8月全球汽车销量榜单出来了,几个数字很扎眼。 丰田72万辆还是第一,但同比跌了4.1%;比亚迪44万辆排第二,涨了17.8%;大众38.4万辆第三,跌了12.3%。 再看后面,吉利27万涨8%,奇瑞28万涨15.4%,第一次冲进全球前十。 前十名里三个中国品牌全部正增长,外资品牌全线下跌。 比亚迪现在每卖三辆车就有一辆出口海外,王传福说5年内要做到全球产销第一。 真正值得看的不是谁排第几,是增长的方向变了——新能源和出海两条腿走路的中国品牌在往上走,靠燃油车吃老本的传统巨头在往下掉。 船大难调头,格局正在换边。

    381137011K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20263.1x their median

    一年前,荷兰打着“国家安全”旗号,用行政加司法手段强行抢走安世半导体的控制权,嘴上说要防止产能外流。 结果呢? 安世转头就和印度塔塔电子签了全产业链合作:核心MOSFET晶圆制造放进塔塔110亿美元的300毫米晶圆厂,封测全系转移,再砸30亿搞联合研发。 天天喊“防止产能外流”的荷兰当局,亲手把产能送去了印度,这脸打得响彻欧洲。 更气人的是,安世是闻泰科技真金白银合法买下的资产。 荷兰一纸命令剥夺中方股东经营权,还拿着股东的钱四处乱投,亏了全算中方的。 自诩法治与市场经济的荷兰,干的是明抢。 对付海盗做派,光靠仲裁和谴责远远不够,得让精准反制落地。 中国企业的海外资产,不能抢完就完。

    3653005.0K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 23 interactions against 166K followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 23% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 4.1K times each, and 0.564% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.45% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 35% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.7K interactions, about 249x its own typical post.

What is 锐汉街评's engagement rate on X?
锐汉街评 (@ruihanmeimei01) has an engagement rate of 0.014%, based on the median interactions across 26 original posts from the last 30 days against 166,101 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.014%, 锐汉街评 sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ruihanmeimei01 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 23% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ruihanmeimei01 post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going