Back to @rubberdeokies's profile

λ‹ˆν‚€ (qdeoks) engagement report

@rubberdeokies - 843K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
10.1%
of 843K followers
Per impression
14.4%
591K views on a typical post
Reach
70.1%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
85K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.525%
3.1K bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.87/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 85K interactions against 843K followers, an engagement rate of 10.1%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 100% of 3,716 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 591K times each, and 14.4% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 70.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.87 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 393K interactions, about 4.6x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bts, #λ°©νƒ„μ†Œλ…„λ‹¨, #bts_worldtour_arirang.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026. Recurring tags: #bts, #λ°©νƒ„μ†Œλ…„λ‹¨, #bts_worldtour_arirang.

Compared with accounts its own size

λ‹ˆν‚€ (qdeoks)'s engagement rate beats 100% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,716 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 100% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 10.1%, λ‹ˆν‚€ (qdeoks) sits above the 90th percentile of the 36,134 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 10% band, which runs 2.11% to 161.6%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.431%
p902.11%
p99161.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,134 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,713 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.431%
90th percentile2.11%
99th percentile161.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-4%49K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%42K
05:00 UTC-4%41K
06:00 UTC-4%47K
07:00 UTC-5%51K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%68K
10:00 UTC-2%71K
11:00 UTC-3%77K
12:00 UTC-2%85K
13:00 UTC-2%93K
14:00 UTC-3%96K
15:00 UTC-2%99K
16:00 UTC-3%96K
17:00 UTC-2%89K
18:00 UTC-2%83K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%73K
21:00 UTC-1%65K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%228K
Monday0%281K
Tuesday-2%270K
Wednesday-1%249K
Thursday-2%242K
Friday-3%250K
Saturday+3%225K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 29, 20264.6x their median

    BTS announces they will not submit their music for the 2027 GRAMMY awards, following the Recording Academy’s addition of an Asian-focused category: β€œI hope music itself can be heard and loved rather than being distinguished by region or language.” https://t.co/voDtw7VJux

    308K67K4.2K14K23M viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 20262.6x their median

    EVERYONE MARK THIS DAY ON UR CALENDAR WE ARE GONNA REMEMBER THIS FOREVER https://t.co/iV9j8zdAbD

    159K59K3801.1K1.9M viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 20261.9x their median

    All seven BTS members stand united in their decision not to submit to the Grammys this year. ✊ "We’ve decided not to submit our work for this year’s Grammy Awards. We hope music will be recognized and loved for what it is, rather than being divided by region or language. Thank you, as always, to ARMY and everyone who supports us." πŸ”₯

    110K46K1.1K6.7K2.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 20261.7x their median

    THIS DIVA! https://t.co/RhaGISAxwk

    114K31K2137341.3M viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 20261.6x their median

    i dont think y’all realize how fucking cool it is to just openly announce you are not submitting for the grammys because of their mistreatment. it takes a lot to have that kind of courage. they said FUCK that racist organization. BTS are truly the most inspiring artists ever

    103K33K190467578K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 2026

    Forbes about BTS and Grammys, 2019: "But as BTS continue smashing records and the Grammys continue to lose relevance, who really needs who?" https://t.co/wK2FV0vzZu

    90K25K352478610K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 2026

    SAY IT LOUDER, ALIENS πŸ—£οΈπŸ—£οΈ https://t.co/Jt2fWStDjM

    68K30K96350447K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 2026

    KIM NAMJOON THE MAN THAT YOU ARE😭😭 🐨: Haters gonna hate And we players gonna play Born in Korea That’s why they don’t know β€˜bout us https://t.co/WFijwVnBII

    69K26K132938825K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 2026

    08.10.26 https://t.co/fLWm24Pock

    64K28K1.4K1.6K1.5M viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 2026

    33 WITH NO KIDS https://t.co/ThsEAB4u9v

    72K20K3072.0K1.1M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#bts#λ°©νƒ„μ†Œλ…„λ‹¨#bts_worldtour_arirang#bts_worldtour_arirang_na#μ˜€λŠ˜μ˜λ°©νƒ„

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 85K interactions against 843K followers, an engagement rate of 10.1%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 100% of 3,716 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 591K times each, and 14.4% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 70.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.87 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 393K interactions, about 4.6x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bts, #λ°©νƒ„μ†Œλ…„λ‹¨, #bts_worldtour_arirang.

What is λ‹ˆν‚€ (qdeoks)'s engagement rate on X?
λ‹ˆν‚€ (qdeoks) (@rubberdeokies) has an engagement rate of 10.1%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 843,442 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 10.1%, λ‹ˆν‚€ (qdeoks) sits above the 90th percentile of the 36,134 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @rubberdeokies have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 100% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,716 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @rubberdeokies post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going

λ‹ˆν‚€ (qdeoks) (@rubberdeokies) Engagement Rate - 10.1% | PlayerSells