Back to @rogerhamilton's profile

Roger James Hamilton engagement report

@rogerhamilton - 860K followers on X

Measured over 6 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.035%
of 860K followers
Per impression
1.40%
22K views on a typical post
Reach
2.52%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
304
interactions (median)
Saved
0.046%
10 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.37/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Friday

Early reading. We have captured 6 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 304 interactions against 860K followers, an engagement rate of 0.035%. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 1.40% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.53% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 6 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 17% are part of a thread and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 44x its own typical post. Only 6 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 6 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.035%, Roger James Hamilton sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,396 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.127%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.127%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,396 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,062 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.127%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link50% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 50% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 2178 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 12, 202644x their median

    BREAKING: Elon Musk's full speech ahead of SpaceX IPO https://t.co/8oH0yzkTgm

    13K1.6K617186678K viewsView on X
  • Jun 2, 202652x their median

    The thing nobody tells you about exponential change is that it feels like nothing is happening right up until the moment everything happens at once.

    12K2.2K66231516M viewsView on X
  • Jun 6, 202650x their median

    BREAKING: President Trump says the Trump Administration might buy equity stakes in US AI companies and that he will host a meeting with AI executives as soon as next week, per Reuters.

    11K1.1K9868315.4M viewsView on X
  • Jun 10, 202621x their median

    JUST IN: Trump announces the government will seek equity stakes in top AI companies to make the public “very rich”

    5.7K4366754532.1M viewsView on X
  • Jun 11, 202619x their median

    JEFF BEZOS JUST EMERGED FROM STEALTH WITH A $41 BILLION AI STARTUP CALLED PROMETHEUS $12 billion raised. Valued at $41 billion. Coming out of stealth today. The backers: Bezos personally, JPMorgan, BlackRock, Goldman Sachs, DST Global, and Arch Venture Partners. The mission: do for engineering and manufacturing what large language models did for text. Bezos is calling it an "artificial general engineer." Instead of training on words from the internet, Prometheus ingests data from the physical world to accelerate the manufacturing of skyscrapers, smartphones, jet engines, and everything in between. In Bezos' own words: "Something that today was going to take 100 engineers 10 years to build, if you can change that to taking 10 engineers one year to build, you're just going to get way more things built." This is Bezos' first CEO role since stepping down from Amazon in 2021. He's co-leading it with Vik Bajaj, former Google X executive. (Source Semafor)

    5.8K649227151820K viewsView on X
  • Jun 4, 202614x their median

    “The next trillion-dollar opportunity is Physical AI and Robotics.” — Masayoshi Son, CEO of SoftBank, also just became the richest in Asia https://t.co/veWhjJf8jZ

    4.3K451116101553K viewsView on X
  • Jun 2, 202613x their median

    BREAKING: The US technology sector has rallied +42% over the last 2 months, the largest 2-month gain in 24 years. This also marks the 2nd-strongest rally this century, surpassing even the +40% gain seen during the 2000 Dot-Com Bubble. The surge has been largely fueled by chip stocks, with the Semiconductor Index, $SOX, rising +66% over the same period. By comparison, the S&P 500 is up +16% while the Dow is up +10% over the same time period. Meanwhile, the S&P 500 is up +20% since the March 30th low, with the top 10 stocks contributing ~65% of the index's gains. Half of the top 10 contributors were semiconductor stocks. The AI trade is hotter than ever.

    3.2K43318155467K viewsView on X
  • Jun 5, 202613x their median

    If an Anthropic employee got $500k/year in equity over 4 years in 2024, they are now worth $125M. At $1M/year equity for 4 years, they are worth about $250M. The scale and speed of wealth creation are incomprehensible. $500k/year equity is not a lot for an early-stage startup. I don't think the Bay Area has seen this type of wealth creation in history. Dot com boom probably feels like a speck of dust.

    3.6K13013021712K viewsView on X
  • Jun 17, 202611x their median

    We built an entire education system to prepare kids for a world that no longer exists. We test memory in a world with infinite memory. We punish collaboration and call it cheating.   This needs to end.

    3.0K4492436498K viewsView on X
  • Jun 12, 20269.1x their median

    🔥 MASSIVE: The largest IPO in history just went public holding over 18,700 Bitcoin on its balance sheet. Corporate BTC adoption has entered another league. https://t.co/XYNx0oENxK

    2.7K3539739223K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 304 interactions against 860K followers, an engagement rate of 0.035%. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 1.40% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.53% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 6 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 17% are part of a thread and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 44x its own typical post. Only 6 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Roger James Hamilton's engagement rate on X?
Roger James Hamilton (@rogerhamilton) has an engagement rate of 0.035%, based on the median interactions across 6 original posts from the last 30 days against 860,421 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.035%, Roger James Hamilton sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,396 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @rogerhamilton have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @rogerhamilton post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going