Back to @rodrigofee2's profile

ELGATO engagement report

@rodrigofee2 - 444K followers on X

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.083%
of 444K followers
Per impression
1.80%
20K views on a typical post
Reach
4.59%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
366
interactions (median)
Saved
0.039%
8 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.67/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 366 interactions against 444K followers, an engagement rate of 0.083%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 1.80% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.59% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 53% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.6K interactions, about 21x its own typical post.

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026. Recurring tag: #novafotodeperfil.

Compared with accounts its own size

ELGATO's engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 64% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.083%, ELGATO sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video53% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link7% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 53% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 7% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 99 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 23, 202621x their median

    Vou te pegar play hard, e não vai demorar! https://t.co/xrH787sa0C

    7.2K21211954269K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20268.2x their median

    Hebaaaa kkkk https://t.co/yRa1NkD37I

    2.9K52781358K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20268.1x their median

    Play play https://t.co/9qQk3C6c24

    2.9K5318442K viewsView on X
  • Jun 29, 20267.7x their median

    Por que a Coreia é melhor que a gente no LoL? Porque enquanto no Brasil o moleque fala “quero ser pro player” e ouve de quem tá perto: “sai daí, vagabundo”… Na Coreia, eSport tem federação desde 2000, aprovada pelo Ministério da Cultura, Esportes e Turismo. A KeSPA nasceu pra organizar, regular e profissionalizar o cenário. A Coreia não descobriu o Faker por sorte. Ela criou o ambiente onde vários Fakers poderiam nascer. PC bang em todo lugar. Internet absurda cedo. Campeonato na TV. Time com estrutura. Treino como profissão. Jogador tratado como atleta. E a China no Dota? Shanghai colocou no plano da cidade virar hub global de eSports. Governo local criou política pra subsidiar eventos internacionais e arenas. Depois sediou o TI9, o maior campeonato de Dota 2, com prize pool de US$34,3 milhões. Não é “asiático é mais inteligente”. É estrutura. O Brasil tem talento pra caralho. O problema é que aqui o jogador precisa derrotar 5 inimigos no jogo, matar um leão por dia, comer o pão que o diabo amassou… pra no final ainda ser chamado de vagabundo. Fora o lag

    2.6K1146216104K viewsView on X
  • Jun 26, 20267.4x their median

    Depois de 5 dias com a conta hackeada, conseguimos recuperar o X! Estou entrando na Justiça pra responsabilizar todos os envolvidos. Já sabemos que isso foi coisa da Play Hard não existe outro culpado. E não vai ficar barato.

    2.6K4138490K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20267.3x their median

    2-0 seco sem trabalho https://t.co/qiDTvrcXD9

    2.5K50471567K viewsView on X
  • Jul 1, 20266.8x their median

    Como o hacker apagou todos meus posts do Twitter agora não preciso me preocupar em ser cancelado. Por outro lado todos meus xingamentos ao play hard sumiram, preciso repor!

    2.4K209074K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20265.6x their median

    Quando eu joguei CBLOW me disseram nunca faz barão! Isso é coisa de profissional kkkkkk

    2.0K2610044K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20263.7x their median

    Loudetes, vocês estão com o rei na barriga demais. Qual caster, em sã consciência, apostaria na LOUD contra a toda poderosa LOS? 😂 Isso não é perseguição, é só o óbvio. Abaixem a bola — o único odiado aqui é o PlayHard aquele bosta https://t.co/XEXrH4krGe

    1.3K927145K viewsView on X
  • Jun 27, 20263.3x their median

    Api oficial Riot. Desde o primeiro dia, o https://t.co/Waw9Kq1yBr foi construído respeitando as regras da Riot e com um único objetivo: ajudar jogadores a evoluírem de verdade. Agora o papo ficou sério, fomos aprovados pela Riot e temos acesso à API oficial. Isso remove centenas de limitações que tínhamos e abre espaço para recursos que antes simplesmente não eram possíveis. A próxima fase do ABSOL vai ser absurda. Aguardem. 👀

    1.2K2522053K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#novafotodeperfil

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 366 interactions against 444K followers, an engagement rate of 0.083%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 1.80% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.59% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 53% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.6K interactions, about 21x its own typical post.

What is ELGATO's engagement rate on X?
ELGATO (@rodrigofee2) has an engagement rate of 0.083%, based on the median interactions across 15 original posts from the last 30 days against 444,155 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.083%, ELGATO sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @rodrigofee2 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @rodrigofee2 post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going