Back to @robsmithonline's profile

Rob Smith engagement report

@robsmithonline - 504K followers on X

Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.03%
of 504K followers
Per impression
4.29%
3.6K views on a typical post
Reach
0.71%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
152
interactions (median)
Saved
0.183%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.47/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 152 interactions against 504K followers, an engagement rate of 0.03%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 51% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.6K times each, and 4.29% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.705% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 115K interactions, about 11491x its own typical post.

Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Rob Smith's engagement rate beats 51% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 87% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.03%, Rob Smith sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video97% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link3% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 97% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 154 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Apr 13, 202411491x their median

    Remember when they said Trump would get us into a full-blown war with Iran? Times like these should make us all realize how lucky we were to have Trump, his strength and his resolve.

    84K20K8.2K3.2K11M viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 2026174x their median

    Final vote total for the NDAA today which tragically merges our military technology and supply chains with Israel’s. Let’s hope this version fails in the Senate because Section 219 is a betrayal of our sovereignty. https://t.co/FtIukTzblR

    46K11K2.0K1.0K2.0M viewsView on X
  • Jun 19, 2026285x their median

    כפי שהנחיתי - צה״ל תקף בעוצמה 150 מטרות של חיזבאללה בלבנון וחיסל עשרות מחבלים. https://t.co/oCbBzuP61K

    40K7.2K9.2K1.4K4.6M viewsView on X
  • Jun 18, 2026130x their median

    Here's a novel idea: stop bullying our ally and cozying up to our enemy.

    16K2.5K7.1K6452.7M viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 2026115x their median

    Biden pardon attorney EXPOSED and DESTROYED in explosive hearing! https://t.co/IvwAr5p0Lj

    14K3.3K33781124K viewsView on X
  • Jun 18, 202681x their median

    One of the curious outcomes of the 2015-2025 BLM-era is that black culture isn’t seen as “cool” anymore. Zero rap songs on the billboard top 100 right now. Zero rap headliners at Lollapalooza for the first time in 10 years. Black slang amongst young people is on the downturn. The coupling of the LGBTQ “struggle” with the black “struggle” has left people associating blackness with gayness. Police body-cam footage, cell phone videos, and the internet have exposed all of the absolutely insane, delinquent black behavior. Whites got sick of getting called racist 100 times a day, which sparked a sense of White racial consciousness that hasn’t been seen in decades. Things are moving fast.

    15K1.1K46884423K viewsView on X
  • Feb 27, 202677x their median

    I DON’T CARE what a Foreign Government wants… I DON’T CARE what DC warmongers want… I DON’T CARE what the mainstream media wants… I DON’T CARE what paid influencers want… The AMERICAN PEOPLE do NOT want war with Iran. NO WAR WITH IRAN. https://t.co/xHGlJLergm

    11K2.0K2.1K158479K viewsView on X
  • Jun 16, 202674x their median

    Name one country, any country, that would go along with a MOU or deal preventing or conditioning its ability to defend itself against a massive terrorist force on its border firing missiles and drones into its towns and cities.  Name one.  And it has to get permission to defend itself or not strike too hard in response to imminent or actual terror attacks?  And for what?  A promise by a terrorist regime that funds terror proxies and seeks to annihilate it that it will comply with a paper agreement, for the first time in its existence, to abandon its ideological ambitions?  Even now, if I understand what's in play, we are stating that we can always resort to military action if Iran does not honor its obligations.  If Iran fires missiles at our bases and armed forces in the region, or if we think it will do so, what will we do?  What did we do?  We hammered the regime.  After having been accused falsely and repeatedly of committing genocide in Gaza, despite the repeated reports and now subsequent reports that this was simply not true, today Israel is accused of blowing up buildings in Lebanon and being too aggressive.  Hezbollah, which uses the same tactics as Hamas and the other Iranian regime terror proxies, may literally become a protectorate of sorts?  I sure as hell hope I am misreading and mishearing things.  If there is confusion it is due to the withholding of the MOU and publicly stated comments, not to those of us who can see and hear.

    9.1K1.9K3.8K276575K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 202664x their median

    Republican EXPOSES Lib Logic On Overstayed Visas vs. Illegal Immigration! https://t.co/uAfqbqisEg

    8.1K1.5K14524120K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 202619x their median

    BREAKING: Yemen’s Houthis announce a "maritime embargo" against Saudi Arabia, effectively banning Saudi maritime traffic through the Bab al Mandeb Strait. Saudi Arabia exports 4.5 million barrels of crude oil per day through this key waterway.

    5.6K84315785863K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 152 interactions against 504K followers, an engagement rate of 0.03%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 51% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.6K times each, and 4.29% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.705% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 115K interactions, about 11491x its own typical post.

What is Rob Smith's engagement rate on X?
Rob Smith (@robsmithonline) has an engagement rate of 0.03%, based on the median interactions across 34 original posts from the last 30 days against 504,430 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.03%, Rob Smith sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @robsmithonline have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 51% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @robsmithonline post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going