Robin Monotti engagement report
@robinmonotti - 248K followers on X
Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 66 interactions against 248K followers, an engagement rate of 0.027%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 37% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.6K times each, and 1.01% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.65% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 43% carry an image or video and 26% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17K interactions, about 264x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #carboncapture, #johnleehooker.
Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026. Recurring tags: #carboncapture, #johnleehooker.
Compared with accounts its own size
Robin Monotti's engagement rate beats 37% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 43% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.027%, Robin Monotti sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 43% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 3% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 43% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 505 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 27, 2026264x their median
JULIAN ASSANGE: "The goal is to have an endless war, not a successful war." War is a Taxation Based Money Laundering Racket for the Transnational Security Elite - It matters very little to them whether it's in Afghanistan or Ukraine, the real goal is theft of public money. https://t.co/rKBiSVZty3
- Sep 21, 2026129x their median
THE WORLD WAR STAGE OF AGENDA 2030 WILL FAIL The Great Reset has failed its Covid route, its "Climate Emergency" Route, and will also fail its war route. There is no willingness in the masses to fight Russia, but there is a mass willingness to debunk the next false flag of the Epstein Class. The false flag will fail, the current political crop will be voted into oblivion as is happening in Germany. There will be no World War, because enough people have woken up to the crimes of the Epstein Class behind Agenda 2030. 2030 was maybe optimistic, the system will fail before then due to the stealing of our political class and oligarchy. We have caught them in act with the money laundering war schemes. It's over, and whatever they throw at us we will send back to them.
- Sep 26, 2026109x their median
JOHN CLAUSER, 2022 PHYSICS NOBEL PRIZE WINNER: "I can very confidently assert, there is no climate emergency. As much as it may upset many people, my message is the planet is NOT in peril. Atmospheric CO2 and methane have negligible effect on the climate. The policies government have been implementing are totally unnecessary and should be eliminated. So far, [we] have totally misidentified what is the dominant process in controlling the climate, and all of the various models are based on incomplete and incorrect physics. The dominant process, is “the cloud-sunlight-reflexivity thermostat mechanism. Clouds are all bright white, and they reflected 90% of the sunlight back into space making them the most crucial yet most overlooked aspect of the climate system. Two-thirds of the Earth are ocean. The Pacific Ocean alone is half the Earth. The average cloud cover for the Earth is 67%; about 50% over land and 75% over oceans. I claim that the above conspicuous properties of clouds are the missing part of the puzzle."
- Sep 7, 202684x their median
1,643 men with localized prostate cancer were randomized to surgery, radiation, or active monitoring. Fifteen years later, deaths from prostate cancer: Monitoring — 3.1% Surgery — 2.2% Radiation — 2.9% P = 0.53. No difference. None. Surgery and radiation halved metastasis and progression. It bought not one additional year of life. A quarter of the monitored men were alive at 15 years having received no treatment at all. Under standard care every one of them would have been cut or irradiated. And every one would have been counted afterward as a life the treatment saved. The men who were treated paid in incontinence, impotence, and bowel injury. Here is the conclusion of the investigators themselves, in the New England Journal of Medicine: "Depending on the extent of side effects associated with early radical treatments, more aggressive therapy can result in more harm than good." That is Oxford. In NEJM. Reporting their own 15-year randomized trial. The scandal is not that the treatments harm (and they do). It is that the choice was never offered. 👉Dive deeper in my latest investigation on the topic: https://t.co/wL5tMqnaHv
- Sep 23, 202667x their median
THE EUROPEAN UNION IS READY FOR WAR! https://t.co/HKmM5B4Uxw
- Sep 24, 202651x their median
Non serve a nessuno e non trova alcuna conferma, l’allarme lanciato questa mattina da un quotidiano spagnolo che ipotizza possibili attacchi ad Italia, Spagna e Francia da parte di navi e droni russi. Già viviamo in tempi difficili e “nervosi” e non serve a nessuno ulteriore benzina sul fuoco.
- Sep 23, 202643x their median
Are you ready to do your war duty & die for your King, for the Rothschild bankers who control him since generations of Saxe-Coburg & Gothas, and against the interests of your country being invaded by all sorts of entirely different tribes? https://t.co/Ay8jdJ0Nlc
- Sep 23, 202635x their median
I wonder what may be the cause of inflation in Europe and Britain? It's a mystery. Economists are baffled. https://t.co/TCup9XcUnY
- Sep 7, 202625x their median
The Moscow-wide procession of the Cross gathered such a vast number of people that even the figure of one million no longer seems impossible. It was pouring with rain. People were soaked through, yet no one left. Orthodox Christians kept walking — with prayer, crosses, and faith in their hearts. Then something remarkable happened. The rain stopped, and beautiful sunshine broke through over Moscow, as though light had come after the trial.
- Apr 18, 202513x their median
📖 THE BOOK OF VISION 👁 A journey into the history & philosophy of the doctor-patient relationship in the Western world Executive producer Terrence Malick - Starring Charles Dance https://t.co/wrSXQBss9M
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 66 interactions against 248K followers, an engagement rate of 0.027%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 37% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.6K times each, and 1.01% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.65% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 43% carry an image or video and 26% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17K interactions, about 264x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #carboncapture, #johnleehooker.
- What is Robin Monotti's engagement rate on X?
- Robin Monotti (@robinmonotti) has an engagement rate of 0.027%, based on the median interactions across 35 original posts from the last 30 days against 247,577 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.027%, Robin Monotti sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @robinmonotti have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 37% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @robinmonotti post?
- Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.27 posts per day across the measured window.