Back to @robinhoodgemss's profile

RobinhoodGems engagement report

@robinhoodgemss - 383K followers on X

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 383K followers
Per impression
0.364%
1.1K views on a typical post
Reach
0.29%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
4
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.37/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 4 interactions against 383K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 12% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.1K times each, and 0.364% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.286% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.3K interactions, about 831x its own typical post.

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

RobinhoodGems's engagement rate beats 12% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 24% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, RobinhoodGems sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video97% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 97% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 420 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 13, 2026831x their median

    In Jan 2024, we planned to relaunch Lilverse NFTs on Bitcoin but refused to do that because of the state of the NFT market. The collection was never released despite the fact it’s fully completed. With the recent Robinhood NFTs hype, we’re looking to do a free mint soon. https://t.co/DQJMT1ZRLR

    1.9K2041.0K192164K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 2026509x their median

    Robinhood Chain infra plays are going absolutely parabolic right now IMO, this is shaping up to be one of the easiest wealth-creation opportunities of the cycle many have no idea how asymmetric it can be to get into the key infra plays of a future dominant chain while it's still in its early days think about being early to Ethereum before DeFi Summer or being early to Solana before it became an ecosystem with multiple billion-dollar projects Robinhood Chain is going to mint multiple millionaires and deca-millionaires before the end of this year you just have to be locked in

    1.6K12225429170K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 2026434x their median

    imagine thinking the Robinhood chain eco just dies here and that's it you must be a beginner those who have been here for multiple cycles and are carefully paying attention will tell you this: we get a new chain every cycle where the main action happens and it's rarely the same chain every cycle in the 2020/2021 era it was Ethereum then it was Solana in the 2022/2023 era it will be Robinhood chain in the 2026/2027 era i strongly suggest positoning accordingly

    1.3K8133447165K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 2026373x their median

    a lot of coins on Robinhood chain look way too oversold tbh

    992704012999K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 2026283x their median

    Is the party on Robinhood already over? Some nasty candles over the last 24 hours, even on somewhat established NFTs and memecoins there. Plus, a lot of people are still sitting on huge profits. Especially in these low-cap NFT collections, you have people holding like 2% of the supply who haven't taken any profits yet and are still up 10x from mint

    6771640235142K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 202682x their median

    You can feel the desperation from Base and Solana to get attention. Let me explain why this is actually positive. Robinhood came in and took so much mindshare and volume that they’ve made Solana start shilling memecoins And on the other side, we have Base trying all kinds of strategies just to generate attention. (Hunter Biden was one of those cases, and luckily people are starting to notice it) The point is that we finally have a network that came in and shook the hornet’s nest. The next few months are going to be interesting.

    2441267617K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202666x their median

    what happened to robinhood chain? https://t.co/Rjhy5bE8Xb

    164788656K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202627x their median

    Robinhood Memecoin Watchlist $CASHCAT | @cashcat_token ~ Robinhood origin meme + flagship memecoin with the strongest liquidity $PONS | @ponsdotfamily ~ dominant Robinhood launchpad + revenue-driven buyback and burn $JUGGERNAUT | @Juggernautrh ~ Vlad-inspired community meme + strong narrative momentum $GOOD | @GoodCoinRH ~ Good in the Hood dog meme + community-driven momentum $AI | @ArtificiallyInu ~ AI/Inu meme + tokenized NVDA treasury mechanics $HOOD10 | @hood10xyz ~ Robinhood Top 10 index token + automatic token rewards for holders $MARTIANS | @MartiansOfMars ~ SpaceX/SPCX-themed meme + fresh high-volatility momentum Which ones are you watching?

    52312421.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202623x their median

    This isn’t just another dog coin. $GOOD @GoodCoinRH is the dog of the Robinhood hood. A new ATH is just around the corner. Looks $GOOD. Send it. https://t.co/0B7Kpypboc

    53201801.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202612x their median

    Top 10 Robinhood Chain Alts ▫️ $CASHCAT | @cashcat_token ▫️ $PONS | @ponsdotfamily ▫️ $AI | @ArtificiallyInu ▫️ $HMM | @thinkingcatRH ▫️ chump-coin:native | @ChumpCoinX ▫️ $GOOD | @GoodCoinRH ▫️ $JUGGERNAUT | @Juggernautrh ▫️ $FOX | @fox_onrh ▫️ tendies-2:native | @TendiesRH ▫️ $INDEX | @TheIndexFi If you could pick one to moon, which one? 👇

    2821602.3K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 4 interactions against 383K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 12% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.1K times each, and 0.364% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.286% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.3K interactions, about 831x its own typical post.

What is RobinhoodGems's engagement rate on X?
RobinhoodGems (@robinhoodgemss) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 38 original posts from the last 30 days against 383,303 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, RobinhoodGems sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @robinhoodgemss have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 12% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @robinhoodgemss post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going