Robby Starbuck engagement report
@robbystarbuck - 861K followers on X
Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 3.9K interactions against 861K followers, an engagement rate of 0.452%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 91% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 66K times each, and 5.90% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.68% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 53% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 16% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 65K interactions, about 17x its own typical post.
Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Robby Starbuck's engagement rate beats 91% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 92% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.452%, Robby Starbuck sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.677%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.677% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 53% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 16% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 53% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 16% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 731 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 22, 202517x their median
🚨 HUGE NEWS: I’m suing @Google today. What you’re about to see is insane. Since 2023, @GoogleAI (Bard, Gemini & Gemma), has been defaming me with fake criminal allegations including sexual assault, child rape, abuse, fraud, stalking, drug charges, and even saying I was in Epstein’s flight logs. All 100% fake. All generated by Google’s AI. I have ZERO criminal record or allegations. So why did Google do it? Google’s AI says that I was targeted because of my political views. Even worse — Google execs KNEW for 2 YEARS that this was happening because I told them and my lawyers sent cease and desist letters multiple times. This morning, my team @dhillonlaw filed my lawsuit against Google and now I’m going public with all the receipts — because this can’t ever happen to anyone else. Google’s AI didn’t just lie — it built fake worlds to make its lies look real: • Fake victims • Fake therapy records • Fake court records • Fake police records • Fake relationships • Fake "news" stories It even fabricated statements denouncing me from President Trump, @elonmusk and @JDVance over sexual assaults that Google completely invented. One of the most dystopian things I’ve ever seen is how dedicated their AI was to doubling down on the lies. Google’s AI routinely cited fake sources by creating fake links to REAL media outlets and shows, complete with fake headlines so readers would trust the information. It would continue to do this even if you called the AI out for lying or sending fake links. In short, it was creating fake legacy media reports as a way to launder trust with users so they would believe elaborate lies that it told. Some of the news outlets/people that Google’s AI impersonated are listed below. Google’s AI cited them all as either reporting on these fabricated allegations/crimes or cited them as having denounced me for sexual assault ⬇️ @joerogan @CNN @MSNBC @FoxNews @realDailyWire @thedailybeast @Mediaite @nytimes @WSJ @RollingStone @NBCNews @Tennessean @Fox17Nashville @glennbeck @megynkelly @TuckerCarlson @billmaher @benshapiro @JesseBWatters @MattWalshBlog @TheoVon @newsweek @washingtonpost @theblaze @thehill and more. As a rule: AI must never harm humans. It must never defame or manipulate — no matter your politics. Bias in AI is a very, VERY serious issue. If we don’t fix this now, we’re in big trouble. This can destroy lives, reputations and livelihoods. If we don’t win this fight then you no longer control your reputation because AI will define who you are to the rest of the world. You better hope it likes you. How @sundarpichai handles this will be extremely telling. Congress (@Jim_Jordan @JudiciaryGOP @HouseGOP) must reevaluate EVERYTHING Google has been telling them about how they’re working to be unbiased — because if Google can fabricate crimes about me today, then it can smear ANY conservative tomorrow and rig the information flow during elections. In future elections, that can decide who runs our country. Key Timecodes👇 (Every timestamp is clickable to skip forward) 0:00 Intro 2:20 @BasedMikeLee statement 4:18 Google notified in 2023 5:09 Google AI admits political motivation 6:59 Google AI admits poisoning training data 7:55 AI admits lying to 2+ Million users about me 8:44 Detailed murder accusation 11:28 Google AI says my followers harassed alleged rape victims of mine and doxxed them 12:14 Google’s detailed false rape accusations 13:41 Google says I’m on Epstein’s flight logs 14:19 Google accuses me of child rape 16:40 Google accuses me of fraud, stalking, being part of J6 and supporting the KKK 17:38 Google says I was an "adult" actor 18:07 A Google employee’s resignation 19:20 Google’s AI calls out… Google? 22:35 Google Execs cry over Trump 23:33 Google AI admits Google wants to "silence" critics + BEGS for the public to be told 24:18 Google blacklists name days before I sue 28:16 A grave warning about biased AI 29:40 How you can help if you’ve been lied to 30:33 A quick update on Google AI lies
- Sep 3, 20266.7x their median
If Lindsay Clancy gets off like I think she’s about to, every juror responsible should be asked by media if they would’ve declared her guilty if she killed their kids instead of hers. We all know the answer. The real psychosis is not holding her responsible.
- Aug 19, 20266.6x their median
Yes, and I’m absolutely right. A crackhead who uses welfare shouldn’t have the same voting power that a hard working person has. This shouldn’t be even slightly controversial. What sane person can argue that people with no skin in the game deserve an equal vote? 🤔 https://t.co/Veyblmo91f
- Sep 4, 20266.4x their median
Killing kids is killing kids. I don’t care if you hear voices. I don’t care if Donald Duck or the devil himself demanded that you do it. I don’t care if drugs messed your head up or if you’re schizophrenic. I don’t care. EVERY child killer deserves the death penalty. Period.
- Sep 5, 20264.0x their median
Just saw a very disturbing video where a Mom is screaming at her newborn baby. I won’t share it because it’s straight up abuse. I will however say that we need mandatory jail time for all child abuse offenses AND a 20 year ban from social media if you filmed it for social media.
- Sep 4, 20263.6x their median
Maxxed out my daughters @TrumpAccounts today :) By 18 she’ll have 300k+!! https://t.co/MCcGlJAqPI
- Aug 17, 20265.2x their median
Nike has lost nearly 80% of its market cap over the last 5 years. When the stock was near its peak, Ethan Strauss wrote the definitive take on how the company was fumbling the bag. They were a brand defined by Michael Jordan’s competitiveness and machismo, and with a heavily male customer base, they thought they could double in size if they could be that and also be Lululemon at the same time. But instead, they stopped being that while failing to be Lululemon and now, they are nothing. A bunch of upstart competitors ate their lunch while they destroyed their brand and reputation.
- Aug 21, 20262.5x their median
On the day Karmelo Anthony fatally stabbed Austin Metcalf, prosecutors report he sent a text message at 1 a.m. that read, “I’m lowk on the verge,” and then stressed the point further. Later that morning on April 2, 2025 - only hours before Karmelo Anthony stabbed Austin Metcalf to death at a high-school track meet - prosecutors state that Karmelo Anthony’s girlfriend told a Centennial High School staff member he was “engaging in stalking behavior, to include, but not limited to, driving by her home and refusing to allow her to end their relationship.” In a 75-page filing, prosecutors also note that Karmelo Anthony had earlier been accused of taking his girlfriend’s phone and, in October 2024, drafted a “to-do” list instructing her how to handle quote “weirdos,” which included the line “say sum slick like my bf kill people.” Text exchanges further reveal that he admitted on at least two occasions to punching girls in the face. Prosecutors located 2021 messages between Karmelo Anthony and another student discussing robbing someone for $300. Other texts show Karmelo Anthony recounting a fight and punching someone “so hard he had to stop fighting.” In 2023, prosecutors say Karmelo Anthony told a friend he planned to vandalize a house in Austin, Texas, writing, “I just feel like it, I gotta grudge.” In 2021, Karmelo Anthony informed a friend he had been suspended for three days after fighting, adding, “they said next time I do sum I get recommended for expulsion,” court papers show. In a 2023 text exchange with a friend, prosecutors have messages in which Karmelo Anthony wrote “Imma shoot the school up tmr” “with my blick,” but later followed up with “I would never actually do that.” In a 2024 thread, prosecutors state Karmelo Anthony admitted to carrying a firearm, telling a friend before a party he would have “the gun in my pocket.” The records also contain message threads in which Anthony mentions carrying a gun. After multiple suspensions for fighting while in school in Louisiana, messages between Karmelo Anthony and his girlfriend surface after he moved to Frisco. In one exchange she suggests he simply sit for a while; he said, “yea and punch ppl maybe run sometimes,” “I have to it’s like a priority for me,” “I like punching people,” “when get mad I see red,” “when I get mad I blackout,” “when I get mad I can’t control myself.” Prosecutors also showed messages in which Karmelo Anthony admitted to getting high and drinking alcohol and even discussed selling drugs to obtain guns. In 2024, prosecutors say Karmelo Anthony tried to assault a teacher, stating “I put my hands in face and everything.” Also 2024, messages recovered by prosecutors suggest Karmelo Anthony attempted to take a weapon into the State Fair of Texas, asking a friend, “if the state fair got metal detectors.” When told that detectors were in place, the friend replied, “you got the poker”; “yea I might have to toss it,” Karmelo Anthony answered. Prosecutors report that Karmelo Anthony confessed to stealing a watch and earbuds in separate Collin County burglaries and to bringing a weapon onto a Frisco school campus, and remarked about his girlfriend, “she went in my bag to get my computer and I said no and she still went in it and grabbed it and my gun and my knife and some other stuff fell out.” Numerous unreleased photos and videos show Karmelo Anthony holding firearms and making threats. Authorities found a note on Karmelo Anthony’s phone containing a list of racial tropes and slurs about Blacks, whites and Hispanics. In one message, prosecutors say Karmelo Anthony wrote, “I hate gay ppl.” Prosecutors add that Karmelo Anthony repeatedly threatened to murder his girlfriend in texts, including lines such as “how many bullets u want coming out of ur chest” and “I’m going to get you (expletive).” He also threatened her with a knife in one message and told her in another, “when I stab somebody I’m gonna lick their blood off the blade.”
- Aug 19, 20262.2x their median
You sure showed that door who was boss This is peak toddler behavior https://t.co/P3Y81jRc04
- Aug 31, 20262.1x their median
A youth football game for 8- and 9-year-olds was canceled after several dads got into a massive fight on the field. https://t.co/QLe6XGLvx3
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 3.9K interactions against 861K followers, an engagement rate of 0.452%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 91% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 66K times each, and 5.90% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.68% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 53% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 16% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 65K interactions, about 17x its own typical post.
- What is Robby Starbuck's engagement rate on X?
- Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) has an engagement rate of 0.452%, based on the median interactions across 19 original posts from the last 30 days against 860,825 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.452%, Robby Starbuck sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @robbystarbuck have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 91% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @robbystarbuck post?
- Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.1 posts per day across the measured window.