Back to @rleshner's profile

Robert Leshner engagement report

@rleshner - 2.0M followers on X

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.006%
of 2.0M followers
Per impression
0.23%
48K views on a typical post
Reach
2.46%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
110
interactions (median)
Saved
0.011%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.53/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 110 interactions against 2.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 3,809 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 48K times each, and 0.23% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.45% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 45% carry an image or video and 32% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 109x its own typical post.

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Robert Leshner's engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,809 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 22% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.006%, Robert Leshner sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,852 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99159.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,852 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,564 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-3%95K
14:00 UTC-4%98K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-4%99K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%232K
Monday0%290K
Tuesday-2%281K
Wednesday-1%252K
Thursday-2%245K
Friday-3%254K
Saturday+3%228K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 22, 2026109x their median

    I want to thank my Democratic colleagues for their important contributions to this draft, and express my commitment to reaching a deal in the coming days that will allow this legislation to become law. Consumer protection and pro-innovation policy aren't opposites — this bill proves it.

    9.8K1.7K299145489K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202665x their median

    🚨 TODAY: The SEC proposed new rules, “Regulation Crypto Assets,” that would create a clear and fit-for-purpose framework for certain investment contracts involving crypto assets. https://t.co/SAA2sErMXF

    5.1K1.5K2063391.0M viewsView on X
  • Jul 26, 202640x their median

    🚨THE BIGGEST NAMES IN FINANCE ARE BACKING THE CLARITY ACT BlackRock, Charles Schwab, Fidelity, Goldman Sachs, and Grayscale, the financial institutions managing over $30 TRILLION in combined assets, have all backed the bill ahead of the August recess. https://t.co/LpoQWOOUWR

    3.5K70513160262K viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 202633x their median

    Look, I’m the last guy in America to carry water for Donald Trump on ethics. Everyone knows my record.  But he agreed to restrictions here. Democrats won real concessions across the bill. And some people still want to pretend nothing counts unless they get 100%. That is not legislating. Pass CLARITY

    3.1K38617327277K viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 202629x their median

    🚨NEW: A group of pro-crypto Democrats say they’re unhappy not only with the Clarity Act’s ethics provisions as they currently stand, but also with several other areas of the bill, including its illicit finance and conflicts of interest provisions. The bill’s path to 60 votes remains challenging.

    2.0K376617103382K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 202622x their median

    Leader Thune filed cloture on the motion to proceed to Cal. #423, H.R.3633, Clarity Act.

    1.8K3611221361.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 202619x their median

    The Senate must deliver a product to the American people that protects consumers, provides law enforcement with the tools they need, and creates regulatory certainty so that the digital asset industry can continue to innovate here in the United States. President Trump through his work with the House and Senate has given us that opportunity through the Clarity Act, and it is time to act now on the Senate floor. I stand with President Trump to deliver for the American people. The Clarity Act is part of the President’s mission to keep American innovation built here at home, and South Carolina will be part of getting it across the finish line. I stand ready to support Chairman Tim Scott, Senator Lummis, and President Trump to create market structure and get this important priority done.

    1.7K2726310159K viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 202612x their median

    I’ve had many conversations since this came out yesterday, and it doesn’t reflect the current state of play. There is a clear path to pass the Clarity Act before the recess on August 7 – and we must seize it. To the crypto community: This is our moment. We can get this done. 🇺🇸 https://t.co/kKlMJV8Xt7

    1.1K1686623138K viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 202612x their median

    The Clarity Act is an effective compromise. It prevents future fraud. And it is not a giveaway to Trump. Even he compromised on this.

    1.2K10466255K viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 202610x their median

    1/ Today, we're launching https://t.co/CpN1VVHFdP — a new website that helps companies, constituents, and crypto voters urge Senate leadership to bring the Clarity Act to the floor. Your voice. Your story. Your vote. 🧵 https://t.co/rBA3zAMrE0

    71027173492.6M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 110 interactions against 2.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 3,809 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 48K times each, and 0.23% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.45% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 45% carry an image or video and 32% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 109x its own typical post.

What is Robert Leshner's engagement rate on X?
Robert Leshner (@rleshner) has an engagement rate of 0.006%, based on the median interactions across 22 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,961,472 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.006%, Robert Leshner sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,852 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @rleshner have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,809 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @rleshner post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going