Back to @rictownsend's profile

rictownsend engagement report

@rictownsend - 110K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
2.07%
of 110K followers
Per impression
12.5%
18K views on a typical post
Reach
16.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.3K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.164%
30 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.63/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 2.3K interactions against 110K followers, an engagement rate of 2.07%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 96% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 12.5% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 16.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 55K interactions, about 24x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #albo, #bowen, #abdullahii.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026. Recurring tags: #albo, #bowen, #abdullahii.

Compared with accounts its own size

rictownsend's engagement rate beats 96% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 98% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 2.07%, rictownsend sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,881 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.68% to 2.56%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.68%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,881 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.68%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video88% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link13% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 88% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 13% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 423 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 15, 202624x their median

    Ann Widdecombe schools a roomful of woke students on the importance of free speech. "Only two sorts of people oppose free speech... snowflakes and totalitarians." "Nobody has the right to live their lives being protected from offence, or from insult, or from hurt feelings." "It is an occupational hazard of living in society. And if you really can't take it, become a hermit." "No matter how much we may disagree with somebody, we should defend to the hilt their right to say it." "You succeed by defeating your opponent, not by wishing him away. You get nowhere by trying not to hear what is being said." "You may feel virtuous today in what you will not hear, but tomorrow somebody may feel virtuous in not hearing what you have to say." "Free speech is for all, not for the privileged few."

    43K12K429493941K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20262.7x their median

    🔥 International lawyer Natasha @HausdorffMedia rips into Macron, Burnham, Sánchez, Wong and Erdoğan for their lies and hypocrisy on Israel. World leaders used the UN podium to put Israel on trial. UN Watch brought brave British barrister Hausdorff to put their claims on trial. https://t.co/tL1sOftniU

    4.4K1.5K1879980K viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 20262.1x their median

    This stinks to high heaven. Prime Minister Albanese hosts a secret harbourside dinner with a dodgy Chinese billionaire — the very same character the Australian Tax Office is relentlessly chasing for over $200 million in unpaid taxes — and then pockets a million-dollar cash donation straight into Labor Party coffers. Gee, what a mystery: Why on earth would a high-roller the ATO is hunting for $200 million-plus suddenly hand over a million bucks to the Labor Party? Especially when the whole grubby deal was brokered by none other than Dan Andrews. It’s not rocket science — follow the money. But don’t hold your breath waiting for a single word of this from the corrupt ABC. Their selective silence speaks volumes. Australia is going backwards by every measure - including corruption. https://t.co/D7XgCHfN5s

    3.4K1.1K1755539K viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 20261.9x their median

    We live on a largely pleasant, yet historically cool world, where average temperatures hover around 15C. This current baseline includes the 1.4C rise since the start of the Industrial Revolution 250 years ago. We are rarely reminded Earth's climate is roughly 10 degrees 'colder' than the long-term global average of 18C to 26C across hundreds of millions of years. A warmer climate would not be a crisis, and never has across the history of biological life. Humans and our unique, symbolism-based culture evolved against this cooling, drying backdrop of the Late Cenozoic Ice Age, which has lasted 34 million years since the glaciation of Antarctica. We are currently in its coldest phase — the Quaternary glaciation — which has endured for 2.58 million years. Almost all human civilisation - and our acute sense of modernity - arrived during a brief, 11,700-year warm interglacial oasis known as the Holocene. This demonstrates that we are an 'ice age adapted' species, as are all modern mammals. Yet the current climate crisis is built around an institutional dogma, which ignores this vast geological history, operating as if the earth works just like a greenhouse, which it doesn't. It's all complex. While orbital cycles dictate the 'macro' climate epochs of the Earth over millennia, the current debate focuses entirely on the 'micro' trend of the last 250 years. Our planet is constantly responding to the orbital aberrations identified by Milutin Milanković. Over the short term, this changeability comes from natural variability in solar radiance, ocean currents, atmospheric water vapor and volcanic activity; over the deeper long term, it is guided by the ponderous tectonic creaking of continental plates. The world's oceans, water vapor and clouds contribute 50% to 70% of atmospheric warming. The geological record reveals that only after the oceans — especially the Southern Ocean — have warmed for centuries does dissolved CO₂ outgas from the deep waters, a process unfolding over 5,000 to 10,000 years. To focus exclusively on a trace gas like CO₂ is to ignore the true scale and power of these natural systems. Furthermore, the narrative completely missed the biological utility of this gas: NASA satellite data has shown a significant increase in global green foliage over recent decades, largely driven by elevated CO₂ levels acting as an airborne fertiliser. This green wave, alongside booming global agriculture, was entirely unanticipated by backers of the crisis agenda. Today, this narrative runs directly counter to thermodynamic reality: we simply cannot run a modern economy without high-density fossil fuels, a baseline power that wind and solar cannot replicate. To pretend otherwise is to forget our place in the natural world, where we live largely by chance, and only as invited guests — not as Overlords.

    3.0K1.2K1016955K viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 20261.9x their median

    Stand and applaud. It takes a special type of ‘genius’ to achieve the highest inflation rate in developed world. https://t.co/UsCLl5b8ce

    3.3K8871683639K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20261.6x their median

    After pocketing more than $16 million of taxpayers’ money from the Albanese government, Channel Nine can no longer credibly claim to be an independent news organisation. It now looks less like a newsroom and more like a well-funded propaganda arm of the Albanese regime. That is why Nine’s latest stunt is so revealing. It flew a reporter to the United States, sat down with a Ku Klux Klan grand wizard, and then tried to smear One Nation by association. That is not journalism. It is a grubby political hit job dressed up as current affairs. Nine was once among the most trusted companies in Australia. That reputation is gone. It has surrendered its credibility, and it can no longer be trusted. Kerry Packer would be rolling in his grave. This is not an isolated embarrassment. It is another example of how far Australia has slid: a government that subsidises the media that covers it, and a once-proud network that takes the money and then does the government’s dirty work.

    2.8K8141204022K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 2026

    DEMOCRACY SUBVERTED A functioning democracy can only survive with fiercely independent media that ruthlessly holds the government to account. But this rotten, stinking, utterly corrupt Albanese regime isn’t satisfied with the taxpayer-funded ABC already spewing endless government propaganda. No — they’ve gone further and brazenly hijacked Australia’s democracy with their sleazy $74 million “Journalism Assistance Fund” — a filthy slush fund of public money that Albanese is personally slinging to his mates in the media. This is nothing less than wholesale bribery of the press. Here are just a few of the 184 media outlets now on Albanese’s payroll, happily sucking at the taxpayer teat: Fairfax Media Limited (SMH, The Age, AFR): $8,163,870 The Nine Network: $7,962,240 Channel 7: $5,594,160 WIN TV: $1,673,100 The Conversation: $1,033,890 Australian Radio Network (KISS, Gold): $978,120 The Chinese Herald: $600,600 The moment any media outlet pockets this dirty government cash, it stops being a news organisation and becomes a paid propaganda arm of the Albanese regime — a compromised subsidiary that cannot be trusted to tell the truth, only to parrot the party line. This isn’t journalism. This is state capture. This is democracy for sale — and Albanese is the one holding the auction - using taxpayers money. Australia is in huge trouble.

    2.2K8771565826K viewsView on X
  • Jul 13, 2026

    Maybe Albanese needs to listen to another voice other than the ones in his office. 👏🏼🇦🇺 https://t.co/3Dk3nZymhf

    2.4K6311443029K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 2026

    Ray Hadley just dropped a truth bomb. Zen Energy – South Australia’s second biggest renewables supplier – has collapsed into liquidation with $1 billion in debts. Losses exploded from $69 million to $322 million in a single year. Chris “Casanova” Bowen keeps telling us coal is dead, gas is dirty, and nuclear is completely off the table, renewables are the only future. Australia was sold a pup. While other countries are racing to build nuclear, we’re still banned from even having the debate. The result? Collapsing renewable companies and an energy system that can’t keep the lights on without coal and gas. We need coal, gas and nuclear. The sooner this government wakes up, the better.

    2.2K6671625248K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 2026

    Enough of this division. We don’t need to be welcomed into our own country like foreigners. Every country has layered histories of settlement and migration. Treating one pre-modern occupancy as the only authentic claim turns history into a weapon and tells most citizens they are interlopers. That produces resentment, not cohesion. A nation belongs to its citizens, not a ritual that treats most of us as guests. Citizenship isn’t a visitor pass. Australians find this alienating, not unifying.

    2.1K2934042930K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#albo#bowen#abdullahii#andrewhastie#athensspeech

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.3K interactions against 110K followers, an engagement rate of 2.07%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 96% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 12.5% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 16.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 55K interactions, about 24x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #albo, #bowen, #abdullahii.

What is rictownsend's engagement rate on X?
rictownsend (@rictownsend) has an engagement rate of 2.07%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 110,406 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 2.07%, rictownsend sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,881 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @rictownsend have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 96% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @rictownsend post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going