Back to @richdollaz's profile

Rich Dollaz engagement report

@richdollaz - 396K followers on X

Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 396K followers
Per impression
0.142%
3.5K views on a typical post
Reach
0.89%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
5
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.73/day
active 80% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 5 interactions against 396K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 13% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.5K times each, and 0.142% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.89% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 99K interactions, about 19837x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #hof, #larp.

Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026. Recurring tags: #hof, #larp.

Compared with accounts its own size

Rich Dollaz's engagement rate beats 13% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 10% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, Rich Dollaz sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video25% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link3% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 25% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 199 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 13, 202619837x their median

    I AM SO WEAK BRO ๐Ÿ˜‚ https://t.co/QF14KvsDRv

    90K6.5K9451.8K4.0M viewsView on X
  • Jul 4, 20267988x their median

    Charleston White goes off on Cam Newton after he tells him to change his delivery ๐Ÿ˜ณ โ€œYouโ€™re worried about my delivery but have nothing to say to these rappers on your showโ€ https://t.co/WItjFYGKpU

    36K3.5K6352781.4M viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20267882x their median

    LMFAOOOO SO ACCURATE ๐Ÿ˜ญ๐Ÿ˜ญ๐Ÿ˜ญ https://t.co/rQVrCrI0hV

    34K4.2K2944031.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20266039x their median

    We have NEVER seen this level of commitment Daejon Love was faking TURKEY giveaways ๐Ÿ˜ญ๐Ÿฆƒ https://t.co/chGVAp3RSg

    28K1.9K320312940K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20265192x their median

    Happy 40th birthday to Cassie ๐ŸŽˆ https://t.co/2h25IBPGRo

    24K1.9K247272462K viewsView on X
  • Jul 11, 20203447x their median

    the tears that are rolling from my eyes https://t.co/h66QKuIyhG

    12K4.8K2983.3KView on X
  • Aug 17, 20264001x their median

    The trailer for โ€œA Different Worldโ€ Netflix revival is out: https://t.co/MD8xQ1HkUZ

    16K2.7K3607871.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20263326x their median

    Just when you think you got it going on, America snatches the rug right out from under you. https://t.co/P7UjQbnOom

    13K2.8K496226608K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20261676x their median

    Iโ€™m so sorry I got mad at this coach for saying this about Jalin Hyatt He was right the whole time unfortunately https://t.co/1m0yVyFtZ2

    8.1K1808445966K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 2026820x their median

    Daejon Love said that Jake Moody agreed to sell him the #4 during his time with the Niners ๐Ÿ˜… This story gets better by the minute ๐Ÿ’€ Via: @CrantGohn https://t.co/u12wYr6JZW

    3.8K2096969513K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#hof#larp

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 5 interactions against 396K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 13% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.5K times each, and 0.142% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.89% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 99K interactions, about 19837x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #hof, #larp.

What is Rich Dollaz's engagement rate on X?
Rich Dollaz (@richdollaz) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 36 original posts from the last 30 days against 395,754 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, Rich Dollaz sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @richdollaz have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 13% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @richdollaz post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going