Back to @ricardoalcarazp's profile

ricardo ice age baby engagement report

@ricardoalcarazp - 211K followers on X

Measured over 81 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.76%
of 211K followers
Per impression
8.56%
19K views on a typical post
Reach
8.88%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.6K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.069%
13 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.53/day
active 80% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 1.6K interactions against 211K followers, an engagement rate of 0.76%. Measured over 81 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 8.56% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.89% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 81 posts sampled, 26% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 9.4x its own typical post.

Measured over 81 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

ricardo ice age baby's engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 96% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.76%, ricardo ice age baby sits above the 75th percentile of the 201,005 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.671% to 2.53%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,005 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,901 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video26% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link5% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 26% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 5% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 58 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 29, 20269.4x their median

    La gente bien moralista en internet pero llenando los conciertos de the nbhd

    14K1.3K49159191K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20269.3x their median

    Elton John anunciando su show en mx y en chinga los comentarios https://t.co/jhDAx9hWYw

    14K9781912107K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20267.2x their median

    B word https://t.co/fFoN45XMot

    11K36212725159K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20267.1x their median

    Goated es una traducción directa de cabrón

    10K1.1K151567K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20267.1x their median

    https://t.co/xTJx8jMZe1

    11K48352679K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20266.8x their median

    Deberían inventar un slur para la gente que repite lo que lee en comentarios de tiktok

    9.9K890504384K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20266.6x their median

    Feliz cumpleaños a mi hijo gay https://t.co/t0ej6sHX78

    9.5K1.0K1381950K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20266.5x their median

    Un día llegué bien pedo y me puse a llorar abrazando al chapa porque ya está grande y los perros no viven tanto

    9.5K812915358K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20266.3x their median

    Aleks Syntek brote psicotico

    8.9K1.1K413775K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20265.3x their median

    ? https://t.co/lQokiSpib5

    8.0K445451365K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.6K interactions against 211K followers, an engagement rate of 0.76%. Measured over 81 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 8.56% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.89% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 81 posts sampled, 26% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 9.4x its own typical post.

What is ricardo ice age baby's engagement rate on X?
ricardo ice age baby (@ricardoalcarazp) has an engagement rate of 0.76%, based on the median interactions across 81 original posts from the last 30 days against 211,173 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.76%, ricardo ice age baby sits above the 75th percentile of the 201,005 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ricardoalcarazp have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ricardoalcarazp post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going