Back to @revistaetcetera's profile

etcétera engagement report

@revistaetcetera - 246K followers on X

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 9, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.002%
of 246K followers
Per impression
0.685%
876 views on a typical post
Reach
0.36%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
6
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.37/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 246K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 11% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 876 times each, and 0.685% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.356% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 96% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 855 interactions, about 143x its own typical post.

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 9, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

etcétera's engagement rate beats 11% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 37% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.002%, etcétera sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,536 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.016%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.5%
p902.09%
p99119.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,536 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,995 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.5%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video4% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link96% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 4% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 96% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 264 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 24, 2026143x their median

    La gobernadora morenista de Quintana Roo, Mara Lezama (@MaraLezama), suma 119 vuelos al extranjero, 97 de ellos en avión privado, de 2022 a la fecha. Su destino favorito es Orlando, Florida. https://t.co/yjg5aClLMu

    504308251812K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 202623x their median

    "Morena enfrenta un escenario mucho más complicado que cuando López Obrador controlaba personalmente al partido y sus aliados. El asedio a la familia del expresidente y a sus allegados, señalados por corrupción, huachicol fiscal y presuntos vínculos con el crimen organizado ya pasa factura y los aliados parecen comenzar a tomar distancia", escribe Manuel Díaz (@diaz_manuel) https://t.co/Jsy7wRorUh

    9840113.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20268.0x their median

    "La pregunta cobra mayor fuerza porque el nombre de Andy volvió a aparecer en el expediente relacionado con la red de huachicol fiscal por la que son procesados integrantes de la familia Farías Laguna", escribe Manuel Díaz (@diaz_manuel) https://t.co/uDabVQHGf3

    2523001.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20265.0x their median

    "El cerebro envejece, sí, pero conserva una capacidad extraordinaria para adaptarse. Se trata de la neuroplasticidad, la capacidad del sistema nervioso para modificar conexiones y reorganizarse como respuesta al aprendizaje y a la experiencia", escribe Alejandro Vázquez Cárdenas (@alejandrovc48) https://t.co/klgsocy27E

    227011.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20262.5x their median

    "La hegemonía histórica ejercida por los grandes conglomerados mediáticos tradicionales ha sido irremediablemente desafiada por la irrupción de medios noticiosos alternativos digitales", escribe Miguel Quintana, "El Troll" (@Quintana_Troll) https://t.co/GC0VAO1YlA

    6720510 viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20262.3x their median

    "Dos personas con la misma edad cronológica pueden presentar diferencias importantes en su estado físico, metabólico y cerebral. Esa observación ha llevado a la ciencia a hacerse una pregunta ¿cuántos años tiene realmente nuestro organismo?", escribe Alejandro Vázquez Cárdena (@alejandrovc48) https://t.co/klgsocyzXc

    111024.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20262.2x their median

    ¡Ya basta de discursos! Las autoridades no combaten las redes de tráfico ilegal de especies animales que hacen jugosos negocios con nuestros recursos naturales: Mariana Gómez del Campo (@marianagc) https://t.co/n13GOLqV1w

    55214.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20262.2x their median

    El exfiscal de Asuntos Relevantes de la FGR, Ulises Lara (@UlisesLaraLopez), fue señalado por su media hermana, Hilda Lara Guadián, de haber utilizado su posición dentro de la FGJCDMX para intervenir en un litigio familiar por la propiedad de una vivienda. https://t.co/gD6RkIleLY

    5800962 viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20262.0x their median

    "El temor de enfrentar a una oposición unida va creciendo y la narrativa insulsa y pedestre del “PRIAN” no encuentra receptor alguno y el llamado al México antes del carnicero de Macuspana sencillamente no es suficiente", escribe Bismarck Izquierdo (@bismarck_ir) https://t.co/C9JNDsKJ0A

    6600588 viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20262.0x their median

    El origen del conflicto se remonta a 2013, cuando Hilda Lara y su esposo compraron a los padres de ella, Carlos León Lara Corona y Ady Guadián Patiño, una casa ubicada en la colonia Acueducto de Guadalupe, en la alcaldía Gustavo A. Madero. https://t.co/gD6RkIleLY

    56011.6K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 246K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 11% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 876 times each, and 0.685% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.356% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 96% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 855 interactions, about 143x its own typical post.

What is etcétera's engagement rate on X?
etcétera (@revistaetcetera) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 23 original posts from the last 30 days against 246,270 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.002%, etcétera sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,536 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @revistaetcetera have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 11% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @revistaetcetera post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going