Back to @rendernetwork's profile

The Render Network engagement report

@rendernetwork - 232K followers on X

Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.076%
of 232K followers
Per impression
1.59%
11K views on a typical post
Reach
4.79%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
178
interactions (median)
Saved
0.018%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.93/day
active 83% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 178 interactions against 232K followers, an engagement rate of 0.076%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 54% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 1.59% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.82% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 69% carry an image or video, 19% are part of a thread and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 599 interactions, about 3.4x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #adobe, #cinema4d, #copernicus.

Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026. Recurring tags: #adobe, #cinema4d, #copernicus.

Compared with accounts its own size

The Render Network's engagement rate beats 54% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 56% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.076%, The Render Network sits above the 25th percentile of the 202,076 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.142%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.672%
p902.54%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 202,076 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,928 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.672%
90th percentile2.54%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video69% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link50% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 69% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 50% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 257 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 18, 20263.4x their median

    Render Network has a big few months ahead. Here's where to find us 🧵👇

    5264921343K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20262.3x their median

    .@rendernetwork just crossed 80 million frames rendered. On July 19, the network hit 77 million. As of Sept 10, that number is now 80 million. 3 million more frames rendered by the distributed network in under two months. More to come. https://t.co/bmW3gsWQ4C

    3534413623K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20262.3x their median

    Lead dev told me that on Monday we can start taking applications to bring beasts into Beastside. Games feeling pretty stable across the board now. We'll continue patching things as we find them obviously but we're in a very good spot. 🙏 FINALLY!!!!!!

    2665278613K viewsView on X
  • Dec 5, 20252.0x their median

    Last night in Miami @rendernetwork artists transformed @nolchashows 35K sq ft concert space into cinematic 4K immersive worlds. Artists featured: @tippydreamer, @Kaszies, @fgoldsack_, @DecimalsRebuilt, @MachinaFractal, @kylegordonart, @jstngraphics, @shapiro500, Kate Anomalit, Ulli Schulz & others…

    2894918430K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20261.8x their median

    Render Network is opening a new round of onboarding for the rendering node pool. We’re currently looking for nodes with fewer than 4 GPUs, 16GB+ VRAM, and reliable weekday availability. Interested in joining? Apply here: https://t.co/L6LXAkcHMF

    277408013K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20261.8x their median

    .@anyma_eva's ÆDEN residency at @unvrsibiza has officially come to a close. Powered by @rendernetwork, ÆDEN brought large-scale visuals and immersive digital art to life across one of Ibiza’s most immersive live productions. https://t.co/F9Vh7EtjiQ

    278356114K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20261.5x their median

    Another large-scale creative experience brought to life with the help of @rendernetwork. Ian Davenport’s Time and Tides is now on view at @W1Curates on Oxford Street, bringing the space to life with shifting color and movement. https://t.co/j3RqFxD7jA

    231331009.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 2026

    .@HalfRezChicago recap: David Meller talked filmmaking, @blakekathryn shared more on immersive world-building, and both touched on how @rendernetwork supports their work. Blake also gave a shoutout to @artechouse DC's SUBMERGE, where her piece is on view. https://t.co/jNaILxajB7

    222239111K viewsView on X
  • Oct 28, 20251.6x their median

    Most people know 4K from TVs. But 18K? That’s a whole different experience - resolution that wraps entire rooms. Let’s break down the tools & tech that make this possible 🧵 https://t.co/RdF6ri0GbX

    185449522K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 2026

    Created using @rendernetwork, “Satori” by @jpierce_art takes viewers through a landscape of light designed to inspire mindfulness and presence. Now on view as part of SUBMERGE at @artechouse DC. Get tickets: https://t.co/knzw0FfEcL https://t.co/wFTANYkc5P

    19431419.5K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#adobe#cinema4d#copernicus#houdini#maxon

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 178 interactions against 232K followers, an engagement rate of 0.076%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 54% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 1.59% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.82% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 69% carry an image or video, 19% are part of a thread and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 599 interactions, about 3.4x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #adobe, #cinema4d, #copernicus.

What is The Render Network's engagement rate on X?
The Render Network (@rendernetwork) has an engagement rate of 0.076%, based on the median interactions across 26 original posts from the last 30 days against 232,005 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.076%, The Render Network sits above the 25th percentile of the 202,076 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @rendernetwork have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 54% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @rendernetwork post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.93 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going