Back to @renatajbarreto's profile

Renata Barreto engagement report

@renatajbarreto - 466K followers on X

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
2.04%
of 466K followers
Per impression
6.41%
148K views on a typical post
Reach
31.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
9.5K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.059%
87 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.5/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 9.5K interactions against 466K followers, an engagement rate of 2.04%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 99% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 148K times each, and 6.41% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 31.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 73% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 140K interactions, about 15x its own typical post.

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Renata Barreto's engagement rate beats 99% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 94% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 2.04%, Renata Barreto sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.677% to 2.55%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video73% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 73% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 113 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 24, 202615x their median

    desculpa é que sou nordestina, filha de doméstica com professor, estudante de universidade federal e fui bolsista. ⭐️ https://t.co/lDuKp3JatD

    128K9.0K2.8K2211.4M viewsView on X
  • Oct 24, 20266.9x their median

    COMEÇOU A PALHAÇADA! A companhia aérea Gol CANCELOU todos os vôos de hoje, que iriam de parte do Sul do Brasil para o Nordeste. https://t.co/hcLFi5h26F

    54K9.3K1.1K1.1K1.1M viewsView on X
  • Apr 8, 20245.0x their median

    Quando o muro de Berlim caiu, ativistas foram para a sede da Stasi (Ministério da Segurança de Estado da Alemanha Oriental, que controlava a polícia secreta) para impedir que documentos fossem destruídos. Depois de um tempo, os documentos foram abertos ao público. Muitas pessoas foram consultá-los para saber se estavam sendo monitorados pela polícia secreta e foram surpreendidos com a informação de que amigos, colegas de trabalho, até mesmo seus pais ou seus filhos, eram informantes. Imagina você descobrir que seu próprio pai, sua mãe ou até seus filhos passavam informações sobre você para ter algum tipo de vantagem ou ser bem visto pelo regime? 😵‍💫 Vendo a quantidade de gente no Brasil que apoia censura, perseguição, ordens ilegais e processos inconstitucionais, consigo vislumbrar algo parecido. Se você convive com esse tipo de gente, saiba que eles não hesitariam em te denunciar, te mandar para um campo de concentração e apoiar até sua execução. A mentalidade dessas pessoas é de repressão. De ditadura. E, assim como fez a Alemanha Oriental, cujo nome oficial era República Democrática Alemã, dizem que é “pela democracia”. Quem não conhece a história está fadado a repetí-la. Que triste para o Brasil.

    37K8.5K1.2K3452.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20263.6x their median

    "Temos que regular as redes sociais pra proteger as crianças" A proteção às crianças: https://t.co/qPw9xJOJr1

    28K5.4K211136313K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20263.6x their median

    Uma obra prima. https://t.co/eTkGizmurP

    28K5.9K272113305K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20263.0x their median

    Lembrando que Moraes é professor no curso de direito da USP, permanece no cargo e foi exaltado por diversos alunos mesmo fazendo o exato oposto do que dita a Constituição. O problema do Brasil é muito maior do que puramente institucional, é moral e cultural. https://t.co/1eXAKgGpZw

    24K3.2K745165570K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20263.0x their median

    Por onde andam os artistas petistas super preocupados com os Yanomami hein? https://t.co/EM7rAmQu01

    22K5.4K343184226K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20262.6x their median

    Somos todos humanos e podemos errar, exceto a Débora do batom que usou batom pra escrever numa estátua e foi condenada a 14 anos por tentativa de golpe de estado, né? https://t.co/wONgvS3dBr

    20K4.6K447192127K viewsView on X
  • Oct 24, 20262.6x their median

    O cara humilhou Belém disse que vivemos no meio de esgoto que cheira mal. Fez promessas de saneamento sem mencionar nenhum projeto específico Se vc é de Belém e ama a cidade, presta atenção como esse Flávio é arrogante e nos despreza, como bem sudestino que é

    18K4.9K1.5K127387K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20261.9x their median

    Imagina o Lula indicando mais 4 Dinos, pelo amor de Deus. Que homem bizarro

    15K1.3K1.3K274673K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 9.5K interactions against 466K followers, an engagement rate of 2.04%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 99% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 148K times each, and 6.41% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 31.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 73% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 140K interactions, about 15x its own typical post.

What is Renata Barreto's engagement rate on X?
Renata Barreto (@renatajbarreto) has an engagement rate of 2.04%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 465,918 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 2.04%, Renata Barreto sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @renatajbarreto have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 99% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @renatajbarreto post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going