Rekt Fencer engagement report
@rektfencer - 348K followers on X
Measured over 41 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 172 interactions against 348K followers, an engagement rate of 0.049%. Measured over 41 original posts, its engagement rate beats 59% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 33K times each, and 0.515% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.59% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 41 posts sampled, 93% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.8K interactions, about 28x its own typical post.
Measured over 41 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026. Recurring tag: #marscoin.
Compared with accounts its own size
Rekt Fencer's engagement rate beats 59% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 32% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.049%, Rekt Fencer sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.677% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 93% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 15% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 93% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 15% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 322 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jul 20, 202628x their median
The World Cup is over. Now all eyes go back to $BTC. What happens next? https://t.co/m1J0jrBWNE
- Sep 4, 20268.8x their median
THE ONLY ROBINHOOD METRIC THAT MATTERS THE MOST. I stopped chasing fresh RH launches. Now I look for coins that have already pumped and survived. Find coins around $300K-$500K+ MCap. Then I check one thing: How much does FOMO hold? 15%+ gets interesting 20%+ gets my full attention If that much supply is still sitting with FOMO wallets after the first move, there is usually real conviction behind the coin. This filter has been working extremely well.
- Sep 8, 20268.8x their median
Alright, as promised We're starting from $20 Goal is $100,000 all trades public. no hiding anything Last time: $35 → $50,000 in 7 days This time I'm trying to beat that If you want in, like + reply (+ must be following) https://t.co/pEfllt73gx
- Sep 10, 20267.6x their median
WALLETS I’M TRACKING IN THE ROBINHOOD TRENCHES. These addresses were extremely early on $CASHCAT and $PONS. 1) 0x7e3ba68c49561aae7c23c1d20fef0f1d7615a3ad $106.5K into CASHCAT +$566K realized Then rotated $113.7K into PONS 2) 0xae0f6a971fb3e7cc671aef6e168c5c9788f72b92 $1184 into CASHCAT +$2.7M ~2350x 3) 0xd5b7c7969eabaf5f10ebe440b7e89dd16fa51ea8 $372 into CASHCAT +$990K ~2660x 4) 0x82fc58011d50bfda0dd10bbecab41803a7758939 $182 into CASHCAT +$660K ~3630x 5) 0x194d98d18113bDD5720A0a89FE2F98C75ECe7344 $44K into PONS around $3.7M mc Bag later marked around $811K ~18x 6) 0x43370371e0bb085d04d02a815230aaf67b35ef25 $103 into PONS +$186K ~1800x Yes, this could be luck. But the same wallets keep showing up early on the same RH runners. I’m watching what they buy next. My stack: https://t.co/nuPgFCXTpR https://t.co/JHfwcjgQN2 https://t.co/rKkmFrIRt2 https://t.co/GbYRI1SKQP Only interested when they ape something NEW. Should I post more wallet lists like this?
- Aug 16, 20267.3x their median
Global M2 says $BTC should be at $170K by now. But Bitcoin fooled everyone. Can someone explain why? https://t.co/lPFYQsYzbX
- Sep 4, 20267.3x their median
I TURNED $3K INTO $250K ON ROBINHOOD MEMES IN 10 DAYS Most people use the same tools. The difference is in a few small details. Here’s exactly what I do 👇 1️⃣ GMGN for finding runners Set the chain to Robinhood and watch New Pairs, Trending and Hot Searches. Don’t start with the coin that already printed. Filters I use: For established names: under ~$25M mc, 7+ days old, sort by vol. I’m looking for secondaries around $5M-$10M that still have room for $50M-$100M. For fresh: ~$500K+ mc, under 7 days old, sort by vol. I like $1M-$2M entries with $10M-$20M as the first hurdle. Always check bundles, snipers and rug flags. Dirty tape = skip. 2️⃣ FOMO for checking holders Take a runner from the last 2-3 days, open Holders and find wallets that entered very early. Then filter them. Stale wallet = skip. Buy and dump in 2 mins = skip. Spraying every launch = skip. Actually selective and early = follow. Wait for their next buy, then only enter if the chart and narrative still make sense. Never copy blindly. If all the big accounts already hold it, you’re probably late. 3️⃣ The most important part STOP BUYING GREEN CANDLES. Don't ape a 10-15 hr launch that's still pumping. - Hunt 1-4 day old names that already ran, dumped, and still have a live community on X. - Paste the CA. - Check holder concentration. - Check if CT is still posting. - Buy dips (100-200k after a 1-3m ATH), not the 2x pump everyone already saw. That’s basically the playbook. Good luck!
- Aug 29, 20266.3x their median
🚨 FIRST DEATH CROSS IN 3 YEARS FOR $BTC This is the strongest bullish signal seen in all past cycles. Meanwhile, everyone is preparing for $40K. You know what this means. https://t.co/8mbvoBXuyr
- Sep 9, 20265.8x their median
I DON’T UNDERSTAND WHY PEOPLE DON’T USE GROK FOR MEME TRADING. I turned $500 → $120,000 in 10 days using it. What is it doing for me? Giving the edge. Here are my 8 prompts for finding the next 100x 👇 https://t.co/i1LuN3u7eW
- Sep 30, 20265.7x their median
https://t.co/NayCeySQh7
- Sep 12, 20265.7x their median
🚨 $ETH IS ABOUT TO PUMP HARD. ARE YOU PREPARED?? https://t.co/CIJtFX93A5
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 172 interactions against 348K followers, an engagement rate of 0.049%. Measured over 41 original posts, its engagement rate beats 59% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 33K times each, and 0.515% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.59% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 41 posts sampled, 93% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.8K interactions, about 28x its own typical post.
- What is Rekt Fencer's engagement rate on X?
- Rekt Fencer (@rektfencer) has an engagement rate of 0.049%, based on the median interactions across 41 original posts from the last 30 days against 348,347 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.049%, Rekt Fencer sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @rektfencer have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 59% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @rektfencer post?
- Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.13 posts per day across the measured window.