Back to @reidhoffman's profile

Reid Hoffman engagement report

@reidhoffman - 1.1M followers on X

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.015%
of 1.1M followers
Per impression
0.528%
30K views on a typical post
Reach
2.77%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
156
interactions (median)
Saved
0.268%
80 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.13/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Wednesday

Early reading. We have captured 2 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 156 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Posts are seen about 30K times each, and 0.528% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.77% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.13 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 13K interactions, about 84x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.015%, Reid Hoffman sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,313 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,313 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,878 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link50% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 50% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 177 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 29, 202684x their median

    1/ Trump was found liable for sexually assaulting E Jean Carroll, defaming her, and now he’s going after her again. Trump cannot be allowed to use the full weight and power of the US Government to come after women who speak up, or anyone who supports them in doing so.

    6.7K1.5K4.6K2691.1M viewsView on X
  • Jan 27, 202544x their median

    Today, I launched Manas AI –– a full stack AI company setting out to shift drug discovery from a decade-long process to one that takes a few years; bringing life-saving treatments to patients faster than ever. https://t.co/CWZDbuYdzW

    4.5K6461.6K1571.8M viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 202621x their median

    A Tesla executive once described a board meeting where Elon was told by three separate advisors that Tesla would not survive the next quarter. The money was gone. The Model 3 production line was failing. Media was running daily stories about Tesla's imminent bankruptcy. One board member suggested exploring acquisition offers. Another suggested a controlled bankruptcy that would protect the brand. The third suggested Elon step down as CEO and let someone "more experienced" navigate the crisis. Elon listened to all three without interrupting. Then he stood up, walked to the whiteboard, and started drawing the production line changes he wanted implemented by Friday. Not next month. Friday. The executive said nobody in the room spoke. Not because they agreed with him. Because they realized he hadn't heard a word of what they said. Not because he was ignoring them. Because the possibility of Tesla dying simply did not exist in his reality. It wasn't optimism. It was something closer to a glitch in how his brain processes outcomes. Failure was not a category his mind could file anything under. Tesla survived that quarter. And the quarter after. And the one after that.

    3.0K1696027693K viewsView on X
  • Jun 10, 202616x their median

    I asked Fable 5 to recreate Monopoly but make each of the properties an AI lab or startup. It implemented everything - game rules, money system, turns, even share codes for multiplayer games. Once you have a monopoly, you can build racks and eventually a data center 🤓 https://t.co/WGqpAlivmz

    2.2K13312051442K viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 202611x their median

    Most founders demand loyalty, but you can't ask for a commitment you can't return (nobody can promise a job for life.) My advice is always to offer a tour of duty instead: a defined mission, 2–4 years, with clear outcomes for the company and the person's career.

    1.5K969113111K viewsView on X
  • May 29, 20268.5x their median

    Thank you for your attention to this matter. https://t.co/fE69tUfPcn

    1.0K182105256K viewsView on X
  • Jun 19, 20266.2x their median

    Ultra-wealthy people have access to top doctors, effective lawyers, and best-in-class tutors for their kids. What if we could make that available for every American? We're well within reach of that future, and government + companies can collaborate to get there.

    4073848039121K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20265.4x their median

    https://t.co/7MdDoJvAY6

    727672232429K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20264.7x their median

    My best AI moments lately have been when the agents work overnight and prepare well-thought-out decisions for me to make in the morning. Ask your agents for decisions, not updates.

    551341251854K viewsView on X
  • May 15, 2026

    https://t.co/QLXU6ZOTrj

    588733326198K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 156 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Posts are seen about 30K times each, and 0.528% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.77% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.13 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 13K interactions, about 84x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Reid Hoffman's engagement rate on X?
Reid Hoffman (@reidhoffman) has an engagement rate of 0.015%, based on the median interactions across 2 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,069,237 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.015%, Reid Hoffman sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,313 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @reidhoffman have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @reidhoffman post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going