Back to @redstone_defi's profile

RedStone ♦️ engagement report

@redstone_defi - 232K followers on X

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.057%
of 232K followers
Per impression
1.65%
8.1K views on a typical post
Reach
3.48%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
133
interactions (median)
Saved
0.025%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.13/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 133 interactions against 232K followers, an engagement rate of 0.057%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 51% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.1K times each, and 1.65% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.48% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 70% carry an image or video, 20% are part of a thread and 40% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 301 interactions, about 2.3x its own typical post.

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

RedStone ♦️'s engagement rate beats 51% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 59% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.057%, RedStone ♦️ sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,969 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.128%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,969 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,068 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video70% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link40% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 70% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 40% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 312 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 24, 20262.3x their median

    RedStone is now ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certified. Audit done and certificate issued by @SGS_SA. The certificate will bolster trust in RedStone among current and prospective TradFi and enterprise partners. https://t.co/xXwqRdXY4F

    18042601912K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20262.1x their median

    New listing: OpenAI (solana:56DeqXiADWY2Y3iD8pdbpTi9jhXXneofTY5dp4Xjpump) at 6x Leverage. https://t.co/FHcOINEiGq

    22615241955K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20262.1x their median

    New listing: GoPro ($GPRO) at 5x Leverage. https://t.co/HzpIyMPA17

    22111341534K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20262.0x their median

    RedStone is powering the onchain NAV data for @BlackRock's BRSRV BRSRV is a new tokenized money market fund live on @Ethereum, @Solana, and @Tempo. https://t.co/9UyPu2sCOg

    17933351514K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20261.9x their median

    We are partnering with @redstone_defi to help bring tokenized assets into broader on-chain capital markets. Eligible assets will access price feeds across the chains they need, @CredoraNetwork ratings, and T+0 redemptions and liquidations. By connecting issuance with the market infrastructure that comes next, we aim to expand the reach and utility of eligible tokenized assets globally. Read more: https://t.co/GFQGdHRJCQ

    132397358.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20261.6x their median

    RedStone brings @Ondo's USDY to @StellarOrg DeFi with a USDY/USD price feed and SEP-40 contract support. https://t.co/lF0VOpRcvk

    1602922745K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 2026

    The RedStone Podcast is live. Five minutes, no filler. Ep1: @carlosdomingo, CEO of @Securitize, on why institutions lead with compliance, not yield, and the road to a trillion-dollar tokenized market. New episodes on Mondays. https://t.co/cVhSfHRagP

    1282425614K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 2026

    RedStone is rolling out SEP-40 price feeds on @StellarOrg for six more asset issuers. @FTDA_US, @ethena, @stbl_official, @matrixdock, @etherfuse, and @avantprotocol. A tokenized bond or a tokenized gold bar is only useful onchain once a protocol can price it. https://t.co/b1tnDkcMCG

    12324201010K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 2026

    A tokenized credit asset can only be used where its value is published. @paretocredit published the @FalconXGlobal Credit Vault's NAV themselves, on Ethereum. To reach new chains, they brought in an external data layer for the first time. https://t.co/CO2EYYw7Tv

    10718381010K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 2026

    26.8M price updates onchain, at a 99.999% success rate. That number held even as volume grew 27x. Behind every one of those updates is infrastructure most people never see. We broke down how RedStone works on @Alchemy, its preferred RPC provider for new chain launches. https://t.co/OhhSLSRo1W

    114203449.7K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 133 interactions against 232K followers, an engagement rate of 0.057%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 51% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.1K times each, and 1.65% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.48% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 70% carry an image or video, 20% are part of a thread and 40% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 301 interactions, about 2.3x its own typical post.

What is RedStone ♦️'s engagement rate on X?
RedStone ♦️ (@redstone_defi) has an engagement rate of 0.057%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 231,524 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.057%, RedStone ♦️ sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,969 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @redstone_defi have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 51% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @redstone_defi post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going