Back to @redmiils's profile

β­πŸ†πŸ…΄πŸ…³πŸ…ΌπŸ…ΈπŸ…ΈπŸ…»πŸ†‚ πŸ…ΏπŸ†πŸ…ΎπŸ…ΌπŸ…ΎπŸ†ƒπŸ…ΈπŸ…ΎπŸ…½πŸ†‚ engagement report

@redmiils - 165K followers on X

Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.032%
of 165K followers
Per impression
4.02%
1.3K views on a typical post
Reach
0.78%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
52
interactions (median)
Saved
0.155%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.37/day
active 90% of days
Peak time
03:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 52 interactions against 165K followers, an engagement rate of 0.032%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 35% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.3K times each, and 4.02% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.783% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video and 23% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 406 interactions, about 7.8x its own typical post.

Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

β­πŸ†πŸ…΄πŸ…³πŸ…ΌπŸ…ΈπŸ…ΈπŸ…»πŸ†‚ πŸ…ΏπŸ†πŸ…ΎπŸ…ΌπŸ…ΎπŸ†ƒπŸ…ΈπŸ…ΎπŸ…½πŸ†‚'s engagement rate beats 35% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 81% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.032%, β­πŸ†πŸ…΄πŸ…³πŸ…ΌπŸ…ΈπŸ…ΈπŸ…»πŸ†‚ πŸ…ΏπŸ†πŸ…ΎπŸ…ΌπŸ…ΎπŸ†ƒπŸ…ΈπŸ…ΎπŸ…½πŸ†‚ sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,005 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.141%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,005 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,901 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video97% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link23% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 97% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 23% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 272 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 22, 20267.8x their median

    Doing my makeup at work. https://t.co/ktAxgqKsnh

    374151529.5K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20261.9x their median

    One thing I've learnt as a creator is that the platform you choose matters. I've been loving Fanvue for the creator tools, flexibility and all the different ways you can earn from your content. If you're a creator looking for something different, DM me https://t.co/I8C1Cdpiz4

    912501.7K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 20261.8x their median

    Being a creator is so much easier when your platform actually works with you. Fanvue gives creators smart tools, different ways to monetise content and real support when you need it. Creators, if you want to see what Fanvue could do for you, mssg me and I'll send you my ref link https://t.co/gw4itfiln4

    902101.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20261.5x their median

    You’re already putting the effort into creating β€” make sure your platform gives you different ways to monetise it. Fanvue makes that much easier. Creators, if you’re curious about trying it yourself, get in touch and I’ll help you get started with my link. https://t.co/PYQ2TeY0s3

    705402.0K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 2026

    One thing I love about Fanvue is having more options for my content. Paid Media Links mean creators can sell content directly without fans needing to already be subscribed. If you’re looking for more ways to earn from what you create, drop me a message and I’ll share my link. https://t.co/qEBbugZkXi

    665201.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 2026

    Creating the content takes the work β€” so I want as many ways as possible to earn from it. Fanvue gives creators different ways to monetise, including Paid Media Links, so you’re not relying on subscriptions alone. Want to see how it works? Message me and I’ll send you my link. https://t.co/xaEwhBszG8

    693011.7K viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 2026

    One of my favourite things about Fanvue? It's actually built around what creators need β€” better tools, easy ways for fans to pay and more opportunities to monetise your content. Curious? Message me and I'll send you my link πŸ‘€ https://t.co/uIyOxUlhxU

    653201.2K viewsView on X
  • Oct 19, 2026

    Been experimenting with a new workflow using Prism and I'm starting to get some really interesting results from it. Still figuring out how far I can push it, but I'm liking what it's producing so far. If you want to have a play. click https://t.co/hn3ZVeyhrD https://t.co/Jj3BpyN0g0

    613301.3K viewsView on X
  • Oct 18, 2026

    Been experimenting with a new workflow using Prism and I'm starting to get some really interesting results from it. Would be interested to see what other creators can make with it too. If you want to have a play. https://t.co/hn3ZVeyhrD https://t.co/CXakkoVVO5

    60250961 viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 2026

    You’re already putting the effort into creating β€” make sure your platform gives you different ways to monetise it. Fanvue makes that much easier. Creators, if you’re curious about trying it yourself, get in touch and I’ll help you get started with my link. https://t.co/JNHYnnmbGG

    631201.7K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 52 interactions against 165K followers, an engagement rate of 0.032%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 35% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.3K times each, and 4.02% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.783% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video and 23% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 406 interactions, about 7.8x its own typical post.

What is β­πŸ†πŸ…΄πŸ…³πŸ…ΌπŸ…ΈπŸ…ΈπŸ…»πŸ†‚ πŸ…ΏπŸ†πŸ…ΎπŸ…ΌπŸ…ΎπŸ†ƒπŸ…ΈπŸ…ΎπŸ…½πŸ†‚'s engagement rate on X?
β­πŸ†πŸ…΄πŸ…³πŸ…ΌπŸ…ΈπŸ…ΈπŸ…»πŸ†‚ πŸ…ΏπŸ†πŸ…ΎπŸ…ΌπŸ…ΎπŸ†ƒπŸ…ΈπŸ…ΎπŸ…½πŸ†‚ (@redmiils) has an engagement rate of 0.032%, based on the median interactions across 30 original posts from the last 30 days against 165,283 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.032%, β­πŸ†πŸ…΄πŸ…³πŸ…ΌπŸ…ΈπŸ…ΈπŸ…»πŸ†‚ πŸ…ΏπŸ†πŸ…ΎπŸ…ΌπŸ…ΎπŸ†ƒπŸ…ΈπŸ…ΎπŸ…½πŸ†‚ sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,005 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @redmiils have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 35% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @redmiils post?
Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going