Back to @realstewpeters's profile

Stew Peters engagement report

@realstewpeters - 942K followers on X

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 17, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.086%
of 942K followers
Per impression
1.69%
48K views on a typical post
Reach
5.09%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
813
interactions (median)
Saved
0.106%
51 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.57/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
04:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 813 interactions against 942K followers, an engagement rate of 0.086%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 48K times each, and 1.69% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.09% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 82% carry an image or video, 12% are part of a thread and 18% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 152K interactions, about 157x its own typical post.

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 17, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Stew Peters's engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 62% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.086%, Stew Peters sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 04:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video82% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link18% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 82% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 18% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 287 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 16, 2025157x their median

    Israel assassinated Charlie Kirk and now the jews have literally overtaken his show. https://t.co/tmLMdGOLko

    132K15K3.8K1.0K6.3M viewsView on X
  • Nov 28, 202482x their median

    OCCUPIED WORLD PREMIERE: WARNING! Sensitive Content, Viewer Discretion is Advised https://t.co/Iy1GFoNqjV

    40K19K4.7K2.9K12M viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202645x their median

    RABBI SHMULEY: “The Jewish people must be feared. That’s why we killed Ishmael Haniyeh in the heart of Tehran. Why aren’t we going after Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson? We’re going to bring the fight to our enemies.” Shmuley calls for the assassination of Candace and Tucker. https://t.co/6B5nbWEJF8

    24K8.6K3.0K1.1K1.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202615x their median

    Former TPUSA Miami social media manager just laid it out: the campus paper ran three hit pieces on her, the chapter plotted to kick her out, and they installed two Jews from Israel as the new treasurer. She says University of Miami put her through hell. https://t.co/Nf3Yp140sM

    9.3K2.3K26487343K viewsView on X
  • Oct 16, 202615x their median

    So many of you asked me to look into ClipIt, the company paying people by the view to post political clips. I did, and it connects to Israel’s $55.5 million American campaign, Trump’s former campaign manager, Turning Point and the operatives working for the Speaker of the House. A few highlights are below, and the full article with receipts is up on Substack now (link in bio, and it’s free). (1) The man who runs ClipIt goes by “Matt Servius” online and has never been publicly named. Wyoming and Latvian records point to Matīss Tabūns, a 23-year-old in Talsi, Latvia, who formed ClipIt’s American company on May 28, 2025, with a one-dollar stake. (2) Fourteen days later, on June 11, Brad Parscale formed Clock Tower X. It went on to register as Israel’s foreign agent. (3) ClipIt’s own records label a campaign “Political” for December 14 to 21, the week of AmericaFest. In those same days, Clock Tower X took in $6 million from Israel. (4) ClipIt’s campaigns kept Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson out of their clips. Israel’s campaign websites attacked both of them by name. (5) Israel’s campaign made its own clip titled “Charlie Kirk,” and its contract appears written to collect repost rights to content made by outside influencers. (6) Everyone keeps asking who paid. ClipIt paid its clippers from a $20 million crypto wallet that traces back to Stripe’s stablecoin system, and one clipper thanked the boss for his “Political Payout of December.” That means an American company has the name of whoever ordered the political payouts, and that record can be subpoenaed. (7) ClipIt rewrote its terms the day before The Atlantic’s story ran. Then it changed its founding year and blocked visitors from the United States. (8) Israel’s campaign sent $4.4 million for “media placement” to a firm run by Mike Shields. His other firm has been paid $2.98 million by Speaker Mike Johnson’s campaign. (9) Parscale’s Israel firm uses the same Ohio office suite as his company’s White House contract. (10) Turning Point denies working with ClipIt. But, it has paid Jake Hoffman’s firms millions a year, and Hoffman ran Turning Point’s 2020 teen troll farm. The attack operation on X reeks of Jake Hoffman's troll famrs Enjoy the article!

    8.3K3.2K319237258K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 202611x their median

    Trump’s handlers caught leaving the White House after delivering his new orders from Tel Aviv. https://t.co/CVOXvqZbuO

    6.5K1.5K46077113K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20268.1x their median

    FBI investigators reported finding the screwdriver IN THE WOODS with the rifle and towel on 9-11-25. The narrative stayed that way until 9-15-25, when Kash Patel randomly claimed it was found on the roof. https://t.co/LDrKkcBnJi

    5.2K1.2K14438207K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20267.0x their median

    Stew Peters: “What issue is bigger in our country than Israel?” Dan Bilzerian: “Jewish supremacy.” https://t.co/OCSOGFCEcV

    4.7K79916335114K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20266.4x their median

    Did he even NOTICE the name of the account he was responding to? 🤣😂🤣😂 This is epic. https://t.co/ZODRkfQhmJ

    4.4K56518153150K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20266.2x their median

    @BlakeSNeff Where were you between 7:53–8:13 a.m. on the morning of September 10, 2025? What were you doing? https://t.co/isRX2vVtjh

    4.1K69120858141K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 813 interactions against 942K followers, an engagement rate of 0.086%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 48K times each, and 1.69% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.09% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 82% carry an image or video, 12% are part of a thread and 18% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 152K interactions, about 157x its own typical post.

What is Stew Peters's engagement rate on X?
Stew Peters (@realstewpeters) has an engagement rate of 0.086%, based on the median interactions across 17 original posts from the last 30 days against 942,441 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.086%, Stew Peters sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @realstewpeters have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @realstewpeters post?
Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going